Advertisement

Food Analytical Methods

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 128–135 | Cite as

Determination of Selenium in Food Samples by High-Resolution Continuum Source Atomic Absorption Spectrometry After Preconcentration on Halloysite Nanotubes Using Ultrasound-Assisted Dispersive Micro Solid-Phase Extraction

  • Magdalena Krawczyk-CodaEmail author
Open Access
Article
  • 442 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, a preconcentration procedure was developed for the determination of selenium in food samples using high-resolution continuum source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (HR-CS GFAAS). Halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) were used as a solid sorbent in ultrasound-assisted dispersive micro solid-phase extraction (USA DMSPE) during the preconcentration step. The experimental parameters including pH of the sample solution, the amount of halloysite nanotubes, and ultrasonication time, as well as the main parameters of HR-CS GFAAS, were optimized. The limit of detection of total selenium was 0.01 μg/L and the achieved preconcentration factor was 18. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) were 6–9%. The accuracy of this method was validated by analyses of NIST SRM 1567a (wheat flour) and NIST SRM 1549 (non-fat milk powder) certified reference materials. Selenium contents measured in these reference materials were in satisfactory agreement with the certified values according to the t test for a 95% confidence level. The proposed method was successfully applied to the determination of selenium in food samples (corn flour, rice flour, oat flour, buckwheat flour, garlic, cranberries, goji berries, and raisins).

Keywords

High-resolution continuum source GFAAS Dispersive micro solid-phase extraction Ultrasounds Halloysite nanotubes Selenium Food samples 

Introduction

Selenium (Se) is an essential nutrient of fundamental importance to human health. This trace mineral is a component of many metabolic pathways, e.g., the metabolism of thyroid hormone (Brown and Arthur 2001; Arthur et al. 2003). The most important biological role played by Se in the human body is associated with its presence at the active sites of many enzymes and selenoproteins. Selenium is a strong antioxidant, which, along with antioxidant vitamins, plays a protective role against the harmful effects of free radicals, hydrogen, and organic peroxides (Terry and Diamonds 2012). Another positive effect on the human body is the neutralization of the toxic effects of certain xenobiotics, especially toxic elements (e.g., mercury, lead, and cadmium), and their conversion to stable, less toxic forms. Increased intake of Se may reduce the risk of certain cancers, as well as playing a positive role in the prevention of inflammatory, cardiovascular, and neurological diseases (Zeng and Combs Jr. 2008; Huang 2013; Carvalho et al. 2015).

A recommended dietary allowance (RDA) of 55 μg per day and a tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 400 μg per day have been established for Se. Its deficiency and toxicity concentrations are very close; thus, taking into account the main toxic symptoms associated with Se (selenosis), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) has set the oral reference dose (RfD) for Se, based on an epidemiological study, at 5 μg/kg body weight per day (US EPA 2018).

Selenium is present in the soil and enters the food chain via plants. Geographical differences in Se content in plants are caused by the varied availability of this element in the soil (Navarro-Alarcon and Cabrera-Vique 2008; Zand et al. 2015). Most dietary Se comes from bread, cereal, meat, fish, and poultry. The bioavailability of this element is low and can be enhanced by a high-protein diet and higher dosages of vitamin C (Rayman 2000). The concentration of this element in the majority of food samples is very low. Therefore, many research studies have aimed at improving the analytical potential of various techniques. Recently, the application of nanomaterials to the enrichment and separation of the analytes has become very popular (Jiang et al. 2012).

Natural mineral materials due to their large surface area, high ion exchange capacity, low cost, and wide availability have been studied previously for potential analytical applications (Krawczyk et al. 2016; Krawczyk-Coda 2017). Halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) are formed by rolling aluminosilicate sheets in the course of the natural hydrothermal process. Halloysite tubes are characterized by multilayer walls with a negatively charged outer surface and a positively charged inner surface at pHs between 2 and 9. This enables selective adsorption, as anions can be trapped in the lumina of tubes while cations can be immobilized on their surfaces (Kamble et al. 2012; Kiani 2014; Luo et al. 2010; Zhao and Liu 2008; Kiani et al. 2011; Rawtani and Agrawal 2012).

The application of dispersive micro solid-phase extraction (DMSPE) using various nanomaterials as solid sorbents is becoming more popular due to its many advantages over classical solid-phase extraction (SPE). This preconcentration technique promotes immediate interaction between analyte ions and the nanomaterial. Additionally, the analyte is not eluted from the sorbent prior to analysis by means of high-resolution continuum source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. This significantly shortens the time required for sample preparation (Krawczyk and Stanisz 2015; Krawczyk and Stanisz 2016).

The literature includes several papers related to the preconcentration of Se on the solid sorbent. Selenium has been successfully preconcentrated on graphene nanoparticles (Kocot et al. 2015), multiwalled carbon nanotubes (Skorek et al. 2012), iron (III) loaded Chelex®-100 (Ferri and Sangiorgio 1996), Amberlite XAD-4 grafted with 2,3-diaminonaphthalene (Depecker et al. 2009), mercapto-silica (Sahin et al. 2003), activated carbon (Wasewar et al. 2009), Al2O3 (Pyrzyńska et al. 1998), TiO2 (Zhang et al. 2007), molybdate-form anion exchange resin (Kubota and Okutani 1997), (CTAB)-modified alkyl silica (Xiong et al. 2008), Dowex1X2 (Lin 2007), and modified organobentonite (Zhang and Zhao 2013).

The aim of this project was to improve the analytical potential of HR-CS GFAAS technique prior to Se determination in food samples that have undergone ultrasound-assisted DMSPE. During the preconcentration step, HNTs were used as a solid sorbent. This nanomaterial was chosen because it is inexpensive, environmentally friendly, widely available and characterized by unique surface properties. The application of the preconcentration procedure based on DMSPE shortens sample preparation time, reduces the potential for analyte loss, and minimizes the risk of contamination.

Materials and Methods

Instrumentation

An Analytik Jena ContrAA 700 high-resolution atomic absorption spectrometer equipped with a 300 W xenon short-arc lamp (Analytic Jena, Jena, Germany) as a continuum radiation source was used throughout these experiments. A graphite furnace with pyrolytically coated graphite tubes was used for analyte atomization. After the measurement, data were transferred to the computer for evaluation. The operating parameters of the HR-CS GFAAS instrument are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Experimental conditions for USA DMSPE with HNTs as a solid sorbent prior to HR-CS GFAAS determination of Se

USA DMSPE with HNTs

 Sample volume (mL)

10

 Amount of HNTs (mg)

5

 pH of sample solution

2

 Ultrasonication time (s)

5

 Centrifugation time (min)

2

HR-CS GFAAS detection

 Wavelength (nm)

196.0267

 Lamp current (A)

9

 Spectral range (pixel)

200

 Dispersion (pm/pixel)

2

 Read time (s)

5

 Delay time (s)

0

 Measurement mode

Peak area

 Sample volume (μL)

30

 Modifier

Pd (NO3)2

 Modifier concentration (μg/μL)

2

 Modifier volume

5

For certified reference materials and food samples digestion, a UniClever focused microwave sample preparation system (Plazmatronika, Wrocław, Poland) operating at 2450 MHz and 300 W maximum output was used. The computer-controlled system with continuous temperature, pressure, and microwave power monitoring was equipped with high-pressure TFM-PTFE vessel and water cooling system. The vessel capacity was 110 mL and the maximum pressure and maximum temperature were 100 atm and 300 °C, respectively.

The HNTs were weighed using an M2P microanalytical balance (Sartorius, Gottingen, Germany) at a resolution of 1 μg (electronic weighing range up to 2 g).

The pH values were measured with a pH meter (Mettler Toledo EL30, Toledo, USA) supplied with a glass-combined electrode.

A Sonopuls HD 70 ultrasonic cell disruptor/homogenizer (70 W, 20 kHz, Bandelin, Germany) equipped with a 2-mm titanium microtip was used for dispersive extraction before HR-CS GFAAS detection.

A centrifuge (model EBA 20, Hettich, Germany) was employed for phase separation after the extraction procedure.

Gases and Reagents

Compressed high-purity argon obtained from Air Products (Warsaw, Poland) was used as an inert gas. Working standard solutions of Se were prepared from a 1000 mg/L atomic absorption standard solution (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Palladium modifier stock solution (10.0 ± 0.2 g/L for each element) was obtained from Merck. The pH of the sample solutions was adjusted with 65% HNO3 and 30% (v/v) NaOH of the highest quality (Suprapur, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The HNTs characterized by diameter in the range of 30–70 nm and length in the range of 1–3 μm with a surface area of 64 m2/g were supplied from Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Nitric acid 65% (v/v) and hydrogen peroxide 30% (v/v) of the highest quality (Suprapur, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used for samples digestion. Deionized and doubly distilled water (quartz apparatus, Bi18, Heraeus, Germany) was used throughout the research. The resistivity of the water was 18 MΩ cm.

Certified Reference Materials and Food Samples

The accuracy of the method described in this study was performed using two certified reference materials. The following materials were chosen: NIST SRM 1567a (wheat flour) and NIST SRM 1549 (non-fat milk powder) supplied by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, USA. Certified reference materials were used without any additional preparation before digestion.

All food products (corn flour, rice flour, oat flour, buckwheat flour, garlic, cranberries, goji berries, and raisins) were purchased in local food stores. Food samples were prepared according to the following procedure: dried in 85 °C for 24 h, ground in an agate mortar, and sieved through a < 2-mm sieve before digestion.

Analytical Procedures

Microwave-Assisted Digestion for Total Selenium Determination

Approximately 500 mg of powdered certified reference material or real sample was placed in the TFM-PTFE vessel of the microwave system and moistened by 1 mL of 30% H2O2. Then, 5 mL of 65% HNO3 was added. The samples were heated for 20 min at 300 W. After microwave-assisted digestion, the clear solutions were transferred into 10-mL calibrated flasks and diluted to a volume with high-purity water. The samples were appropriately diluted depending on the concentration level of Se prior to further analysis. A corresponding blank was also prepared according to the microwave-assisted digestion procedure detailed above.

Preconcentration and HR-CS GFAAS Determination Procedures

A total of 1000 mg of HNTs was placed into a 10-mL flask and filled with deionized water up to the mark to obtain a 10% (m/v) suspension. The HNTs were weighed using a microanalytical balance. The suspension of HNTs was dispersed for 1 min using a Sonopuls HD 70 ultrasonic cell disruptor/homogenizer equipped with a 2-mm titanium microtip. Ten milliliters of sample solution was mixed with 5 mg of HNTs (as 50 μL of a 10% (m/v) suspension). The pH of the sample was adjusted to 2 using a pH meter supplied with a glass-combined electrode. Then, the sample was sonicated for 5 s using an ultrasonic homogenizer. Homogenization was achieved, promoting a reaction between analyte ions and HNTs. Subsequently, the mixture was centrifuged for 2 min at 4500 rpm. A centrifuge was employed for phase separation after the extraction procedure. Se ions adsorbed on the HNTs settled at the bottom of the tube. Then, the water phase was removed and the analyte-loaded HNTs were suspended using 0.25 mL of deionized water. To determine the analyte, 30 μL of the slurry was injected into the graphite tube for HR-CS GFAAS determination under optimized conditions. Before transfer to the graphite furnace, the samples were homogenized using the ultrasonic homogenizer for 15 s. Peak area absorbance signals were used for calculations. Following DMSPE extraction, calibration was performed using the method of standard addition.

The slurry should be stabilized using highly viscous liquid media to prevent rapid sedimentation (Kurfürst 1998). In the study, the repeatability of the results obtained using ultrasonic homogenization of the slurry was satisfactory (relative standard deviation (RSD) ≤ 10%), thereby no slurry-stabilizing agent was added.

Results and Discussion

Analytical Blank

Even though the chemicals used during this research were of the best quality available, there are still several possible sources of contamination, e.g., HNTs used as an adsorbent. For this reason, blank was determined using the same procedure used for samples (USA DMSPE) and the mean blank value was subtracted from the sample value after all calculations. The absolute blank achieved for Se was 0.3 ng using HR-CS GFAAS determination.

Selection of Instrumental Conditions

The operating parameters of the HR-CS GFAAS instrument are given in Table 1. Selenium was determined in the most sensitive wavelength as the primary resonance line (196.0267 nm).

In the course of study, pyrolysis and atomization temperatures were optimized to achieve maximum analytical signals. The rest of the operating conditions of the graphite furnace program were those recommended by the manufacturer. In these research, palladium modifier was used at a concentration of 2 μg/μL with a volume of 5 μL. The liquid sample concentration used for optimization of pyrolysis and atomization temperatures was 1 μg/L for Se. The influence of pyrolysis temperature on the absorbance was studied within the range of 850–1250 °C (Fig. 1). The maximum absorbances were achieved when pyrolysis temperature was 1050 °C. After optimization of pyrolysis conditions, the effect of atomization temperature on Se analytical signals was studied within the range of 1900–2300 °C (Fig. 1). In this research, optimum pyrolysis temperature was used. The maximum absorbance was achieved when atomization temperature was 2100 °C. Complete vaporization and atomization of a determined element have been achieved in the graphite tube with minimal influence of matrix. The temperature program used for Se determination in certified reference materials and real samples is shown in Table 2.
Fig. 1

Optimization of pyrolysis and atomization temperatures performed for sample solution containing 1 μg/L of Se. Conditions: sample pH 2, sample volume 10 mL, centrifugation time 2 min, ultrasonication time 5 s, and amount of adsorbent 10 mg. The error bar is the standard deviation (n = 5)

Table 2

Graphite furnace temperature program for determination of Se by HR-CS GFAAS

Step no.

Stage

Temperature, °C

Ramp, °C/s

Hold, s

Gas flow rate, L/min

1

Drying

80

6

20

2.0

2

Drying

90

3

20

2.0

3

Drying

110

5

10

2.0

4

Pyrolysis

350

50

20

2.0

5

Pyrolysis

1050

300

10

2.0

6

Gas adaption

1050

0

5

Stop

7

Atomize

2100

1500

4

Stop

8

Clean

2450

500

4

2.0

Effect of Sample pH

Sample pH is an important parameter which strongly affects the adsorption of Se on HNTs. The surface of an HNT contains a significant number of hydroxyl groups (Si–OH and Al–OH), which can ionize in the following form (Luo et al. 2010):
$$ \mathrm{Si}/\mathrm{Al}-{{\mathrm{O}\mathrm{H}}_2}^{+}\;\overset{{\mathrm{H}}^{+}}{\leftarrow}\;\mathrm{Si}/\mathrm{Al}-\mathrm{OH}\;\overset{{\mathrm{O}\mathrm{H}}^{-}}{\to}\kern0.24em \mathrm{Si}/\mathrm{Al}-{\mathrm{O}}^{-} $$

Silica, as an acidic oxide, causes the reaction on the right side of the equation to predominate over a wide pH range, while alumina exhibits amphoteric behavior. Since the surface of an HNT is mainly occupied by silica, it is negatively charged over a wide pH range. The zero-point of charge (pHzpc) of HNTs has been found at pH 2.7–2.8 (Luo et al. 2010; Levis and Deasy 2002; Mellouk et al. 2009; Zhao et al. 2013). The surfaces of HNTs, which are mostly positively charged below this pH value, acquire a negative charge above it. At pH 2.7–2.8, the number of negatively charged Al–OH sites equals the number of positively charged Si–OH sites, and the surface is electrically neutral.

To study the influence of pH on the adsorption of Se on HNTs, experiments were carried out at different pH values. The effect of pH was studied over a range of 1–10 (Fig. 2). Modification of pH was accomplished by adding appropriate amounts of NaOH or HNO3. It was observed that when the pH was low (1–2), absorbance increased with pH. When the pH rose to 2, the absorbance of the analyte reached its maximum value and remained stable at a pH of 3. At a low pH, the surfaces of HNTs were mostly positively charged. Selenite or selenate species in a solution may be either H2SeO3, HSeO3, and SeO32 or H2SeO4, HSeO4, and SeO42− depending on the pH of the solution (Bodek 1988). Selenite is a thermodynamically favored species at pH values between 3 and 8; however, in oxidizing media, soluble Se (VI) can exist as selenate. The pKa values for selenic acid (H2SeO4) are < 1 and 1.7 (Herrero Latorre et al. 2013). Therefore, at pH values of 2–3, the primary species for Se (VI) is SeO42−. However, with subsequent increases in pH (above 3), the absorbance for Se decreased. This may have been HNTs, at increasing values of pH, favor the adsorption of cations. Therefore, in this study, a pH of 2 was chosen for further experiments.
Fig. 2

Influence of pH on adsorption of Se (1 μg/L) on HNTs. Conditions: sample volume 10 mL, centrifugation time 2 min, ultrasonication time 5 s, and amount of adsorbent 10 mg. The error bar is the standard deviation (n = 5)

Effect of HNT Amount

To obtain the highest analytical signals, an appropriate amount of HNTs should be used as the adsorbent in the DMSPE procedure. To achieve the optimum amount of HNTs necessary for the quantitative enrichment of Se, the introduced amount of adsorbent was varied from 1 to 15 mg per sample (10 mL). It was observed that the absorbance increased with an amount of HNTs in the range of 1–5 mg (Fig. 3). This can be explained by the increase in the number of active sites on the surface of the HNTs available for binding analyte ions. For the amount of HNTs equal to 5 mg, the absorbance reached a maximum. The amount of HNTs was found to have a plateau of absorbance in the range 5–15 mg, because the number of active sites was sufficient to bind all analyte ions present in the samples. Therefore, in this study, the quantity of 5 mg of HNTs was chosen for further experiments.
Fig. 3

Influence of amount of HNTs on adsorption of Se (1 μg/L). Conditions: sample volume 10 mL, centrifugation time 2 min, ultrasonication time 5 s, and sample pH 2. The error bar is the standard deviation (n = 5)

Effect of Ultrasonication Time

The influence of the ultrasonication time on the absorbance of the analyte was investigated within the range of 1–15 s. It was observed that when the extraction time was short (1–3 s), absorbance increased with the ultrasonication time. This can be explained by the decreased contact time between the sample solution and the adsorbent. When the ultrasonication time was extended to 5 s, the absorbance of the analyte reached its maximum. It was found that the ultrasonication time reached a plateau within a range of 5–15 s. In the DMSPE procedure, the ultrasonication time not only affects the absorbance of the analyte but also enables us to control the time of analysis. For this reason, an ultrasonication time of 5 s was chosen for further analysis. The results are shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4

Influence of ultrasonication time on adsorption of Se (1 μg/L). Conditions: sample volume 10 mL, centrifugation time 2 min, amount of adsorbent 10 mg, and sample pH 2. The error bar is the standard deviation (n = 5)

Adsorption Capacity

In order to determine the adsorption capacity of HNTs, 20 mg of adsorbent was added to 10 mL of a sample solution containing 25 mg/L of Se. The experiment was performed at a pH of 2. Following sonication for 5 s, the mixture was centrifuged for 3 min at 4500 rpm and the water phase was collected. The concentration of remaining Se ions in the water phase was determined using HR-CS GFAAS. The adsorption capacity (qt) was calculated from the equation qt = V (C0− Ct) / W, where C0 and Ct are the element concentrations before and after adsorption (mg/L), V is the volume of sample solution (L), and W is the mass of adsorbent (g) (Kiani et al. 2011). The adsorption capacity was found to be 11 mg/g for Se.

Analytical Figures of Merit

In this work, the limit of detection was calculated according to the IUPAC definition, LOD = 3SD/m, and the limit of quantification was calculated from the equation LOQ = 10SD/m, where SD is the standard deviation of 10 consecutive measurements of blank solution and m is the slope of the addition graph (Currie 1995). The concentration limit of detection was 0.01 μg/L and the limit of quantification was 0.03 μg/L for Se.

Five replicate measurements of the total procedure blank solution were carried out, and the RSD of the background value for the raw data was calculated. The RSD was 6–9% for Se. This reflects the imprecision of the total procedure. The absolute blank achieved for Se was 0.3 ng. The linear range of the calibration function was 0.1–10 μg/L. The liquid sample concentration used for assessing precision was 0.25 μg/L.

The preconcentration factor achieved for Se was 18. Preconcentration factor was calculated using the ratio of the analyte concentration in the solid phase (C1) to the initial concentration of the analyte (C0) within the sample solution: PF = C1/C0 (Rydberg 2004).

Accuracy Verification

To ensure the accuracy and precision of the method, two certified reference materials were analyzed: NIST SRM 1567a (wheat flour) and NIST SRM 1549 (non-fat milk powder).

These certified reference materials were chosen, because they were the closest available to analyzed food samples and are certified for the assessment of the analyte of interest. Results obtained for certified reference materials are summarized in Table 3. Short-term precision is expressed as the RSD of five replicate measurements of each sample. The results agree with certified values for certified reference materials according to the t test for a 95% confidence level. The obtained results show that the proposed method can be applied to the preconcentration and determination of Se in food samples.
Table 3

Determination of Se (concentration in μg/g) in certified reference materials using HR-CS GFAAS technique after adsorption on HNTs

Sample

Certified value

Found

Value of t test

Significanceb

NIST SRM 1567a (wheat flour)

1.1 ± 0.2

1.3 ± 0.2a

2.236

NS

NIST SRM 1549 (non-fat milk powder)

0.11 ± 0.01

0.10 ± 0.01a

2.236

NS

NS not significant

aStandard deviation for five replicate measurements

bSignificance of t test (n = 5) at 95% confidence level; tcritical = 2.776

Selenium Determination in Food Samples

In order to evaluate the usefulness of the proposed method in determining Se, contents in eight food samples (corn flour, rice flour, oat flour, buckwheat flour, garlic, cranberries, goji berries, and raisins) were analyzed using the experimental conditions previously optimized. The results for the samples analyzed using the evaluated method are given in Table 4. Quantification of Se was based on the method of standard addition. In all cases, the precision (RSD) of replicate determination is approximately 6–9%.
Table 4

Determination of Se in food samples using HR-CS GFAAS technique after adsorption on HNTs

Sample

Se (μg/g)

Corn flour

0.025 ± 0.002a

Rice flour

0.026 ± 0.001a

Oat flour

0.228 ± 0.014a

Buckwheat flour

0.031 ± 0.002a

Garlic

0.045 ± 0.003a

Cranberries

<LODb

Goji berries

0.640 ± 0.038a

Raisins

<LODb

aStandard deviation for five replicate

bBelow limit of detection

Comparison with Other Methods

A comparison of the important parameters such as LOD, preconcentration factor, and RSD of the proposed method with other analytical procedures described in the literature was performed. As shown in Table 5, the limits of detection for Se obtained after DMSPE with HNTs as sorbent are better or comparable with those presented in the literature.
Table 5

Comparison of the proposed method with other reported in the literature

Preconcentration system

Detection technique

LODa (μg L−1)

PFb

RSDc (%)

Ref.

Ultrasound-assisted dispersive micro solid-phase extraction with graphene

Energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (EDXRF)

0.032

1013

5.1–6.6

Kocot et al. 2015

Dispersive solid-phase microextraction with multiwalled carbon nanotubes

X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF)

3.2

-d

0.06–0.2

Skorek et al. 2012

Adsorption on iron (III)-Chelex-l00 resin

Differential pulse cathodic stripping voltammetry (DPCSV)

0.1

-d

1–3

Ferri and Sangiorgio 1996

Microcolumn on-line preconcentration with CTAB-modified alkyl silica

Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES)

0.1

27.6

3.6

Xiong et al. 2008

Solid-phase extraction with organobentonite modified with dithizone

Hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry (HG-AAS)

0.0076

100

1.07–5.88

Zhang and Zhao 2013

Preconcentration with molybdate-form anion exchange resin

Graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GF-AAS)

5.0

-d

-d

Kubota and Okutani 1997

Preconcentration on activated alumina

Graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GF-AAS)

0.049

100

5.2

Pyrzyńska et al. 1998

Solid-phase extraction with TiO2

Graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GF-AAS)

0.06

-d

3.3

Zhang et al. 2007

Solid phase extraction on Dowex 1X2

Graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GF-AAS)

0.0056

-d

-d

Lin 2007

Ultrasound-assisted dispersive micro solid-phase extraction with HNTs

HR-CS GF AAS with slurry sampling

0.01

18

6–9

This work

aLimit of detection

bPreconcentration factor

cRelative standard deviation

dNot presented

Conclusions

This research demonstrates that the proposed preconcentration technique with the use of HNTs as a solid sorbent combined with HR-CS GFAAS as a detector can be used for the determination of low concentrations of Se in food samples. The preconcentration technique based on USA DMSPE shortens the time of sample preparation in comparison with classical SPE. The analyte is not eluted from the sorbent prior to HR-CS GFAAS analysis, thus reducing sample preparation time and the possibility of loss of the analyte, and minimizing the risk of contamination. The HNTs are characterized by high surface area and good exchange capacity. This solid adsorbent is also cheap, environmentally friendly, and widely available. However, the direct introduction of the natural nanomaterials (e.g., HNTs) to the atomizer can lead to many interferences. For this reason, in the first stage of the study, it is necessary to find out if the material which we want to use is characterized by sufficiently low blank signal.

Notes

Funding Information

This study was financially supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Grant No. 03/31/DSPB/0359).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Magdalena Krawczyk-Coda declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

References

  1. Arthur JR, Mckenzie RC, Beckett GJ (2003) Selenium in the immune system. J Nutr 133:1457S–1459SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bodek I (1988) Environmental inorganic chemistry properties, processes and estimation methods. Pergamon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown KM, Arthur JR (2001) Selenium, selenoproteins and human health: a review. Public Health Nutr 4:593–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carvalho DC, Coelho LM, Acevedo MSMSF, Coelho NMM (2015) The oligoelements. In: de la Guardia M, Garrigues S (eds) Handbook of mineral elements in food. Wiley, Chichester, pp 109–122Google Scholar
  5. Currie LA (1995) Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods including detection and quantification capabilities (IUPAC Recommendations 1995). Pure Appl Chem 67:1699–1723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Depecker G, Branger C, Margaillan A, Pigot T, Blanc S, Robert-Peillard F, Coulomb B, Boudenne J-L (2009) Synthesis and applications of XAD-4-DAN chelate resin for the separation and determination of Se (IV). React Funct Polym 69:877–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferri T, Sangiorgio P (1996) Determination of selenium speciation in river waters by adsorption of iron (III)-Chelex-100 resin and differential pulse cathodic stripping voltammetry. Anal Chim Acta 321:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Herrero Latorre C, Barciela Garcia J, Garcia Martina S, Pena Crecente RM (2013) Solid chase extraction for thr spetiation and preconcetration of inorganic selenium in water samples: a review. Anal Chim Acta 804:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang Z (2013) The role of dietary selenium in inflammation and immunity. In: Calder PC, Yaqoob P (eds) Diet, immunity and inflammation. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 157–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jiang X, Huang K, Deng D, Xia H, Hou X, Zheng C (2012) Nanomaterials in analytical atomic spectrometry. Trends Anal Chem 39:38–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kamble R, Ghag M, Gaikawad S, Panda BK (2012) Halloysite nanotubes and applications: a review. J Adv Sci Res 3:25–29Google Scholar
  12. Kiani G (2014) High removal capacity of silver ions from aqueous solutions onto halloysite nanotubes. Appl Clay Sci 90:159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kiani G, Dostali M, Rostami A, Khataee AR (2011) Adsorption studies on the removal of malachite green from aqueous solutions onto halloysite nanotubes. Appl Clay Sci 54:34–39Google Scholar
  14. Kocot K, Leardi R, Walczak B, Sitko R (2015) Determination and speciation of trace and ultratrace selenium ions by energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry using graphene as solid adsorbent in dispersive micro-solid phase extraction. Talanta 134:360–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krawczyk M, Stanisz E (2015) Silver nanoparticles as a solid sorbent in ultrasound-assisted dispersive micro solid-phase extraction for the atomic absorption spectrometry of mercury in water samples. J Anal At Spectrom 30:2353–2358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krawczyk M, Stanisz E (2016) Ultrasound-assisted dispersive micro solid-phase extraction with nano-TiO2 as adsorbent for the determination of mercury species. Talanta 161:384–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krawczyk M, Akbari S, Jeszka-Skowron M, Pajootan E, Fard FS (2016) Application of dendrimer modified halloysite nanotubes as a new sorbent for ultrasound-assisted dispersive micro-solid phase extraction and sequential determination of cadmium and lead in water samples. J Anal At Spectrom 31:1505–1514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krawczyk-Coda M (2017) Halloysite nanotubes as a solid sorbent in ultrasound-assisted dispersive micro solid-phase extraction for the determination of bismuth in water samples using high-resolution continuum source graphite-furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Spectrochim Acta B 129:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kubota T, Okutani T (1997) Determination of selenium content in natural water by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry after preconcentration with molybdate-form anion exchange resin. Anal Chim Acta 351:319–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kurfürst U (1998) Solid sample analysis: direct and slurry sampling using GF-AAS and ETV-ICP. Springer, Verlag Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  21. Levis SR, Deasy PB (2002) Characterization of halloysite for use as microtubular drug delivery system. Int J Pharm 243:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lin T-S (2007) Inorganic selenium speciation in ground waters by solid phase extraction on Dowex 1X2. J Hazard Mater 149:80–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Luo P, Zhao Y, Zhang B, Liu J, Yang Y, Liu J (2010) Study on the adsorption of neutral red from aqueous solution onto halloysite nanotubes. Water Res 44:1489–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mellouk S, Cherifi S, Sassi M, Marouf-Khelifa K, Bengueddach A, Schott J, Khelifa A (2009) Intercalation of halloysite from Djebel Debagh (Algeria) and adsorption of copper ions. Appl Clay Sci 44:230–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Navarro-Alarcon M, Cabrera-Vique C (2008) Selenium in food and the human body: a review. Sci Total Environ 400:115–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pyrzyńska K, Drzewicz P, Trojanowicz M (1998) Preconcentration and separation of inorganic selenium species on activated alumina. Anal Chim Acta 363:141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rawtani D, Agrawal YK (2012) Multifarious applications of halloysite nanotubes: a review. Rev Adv Mater Sci 30:282–295Google Scholar
  28. Rayman MP (2000) The importance of selenium to human health. Lancet 356:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rydberg J (2004) Solvent extraction principles and practice. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sahin F, Volkan M, Howard AG, Ataman OY (2003) Selective pre-concentration of selenite from aqueous samples using mercapto-silica. Talanta 60:1003–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Skorek R, Turek E, Zawisza B, Marguí E, Queralt I, Stempin M, Kucharski P, Sitko R (2012) Determination of selenium by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry using dispersive solid-phase microextraction with multiwalled carbon nanotubes as solid sorbent. J Anal At Spectrom 27:1688–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Terry EN, Diamonds AM (2012) Selenium. In: Erdman JW, MacDonald IA, Zeisel SH (eds) Present knowledge in nutrition, 10th edn. Willey-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 568–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. US EPA (2018) Integrated risk information system. Selenium and Compounds. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/iris_documents/documents/subst/0472_summary.pdf. Accessed 27 Mar 2018
  34. Wasewar KL, Prasad B, Gulipalli S (2009) Removal of selenium by adsorption onto granular activated carbon (GAC) and powdered activated carbon (PAC). Clean-Soil Air Water 37:872–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xiong C, He M, Hu B (2008) On-line separation and preconcentration of inorganic arsenic and selenium species in natural water samples with CTAB-modified alkyl silica microcolumn and determination by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry. Talanta 76:772–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zand N, Christides T, Loughrill E (2015) Dietary intake of minerals. In: de la Guardia M, Garrigues S (eds) Handbook of Mineral Elements in Food. Wiley, Chichester, pp 23–39Google Scholar
  37. Zeng H, Combs GF Jr (2008) Selenium as an anticancer nutrient: roles in cell proliferation and tumor cell invasion. J Nutr Biochem 19:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang D, Zhao GS (2013) Determination of trace selenium in urine and water samples by hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry after preconcentration/separation with modified organobentonite with dithizone. Asian J Chem 25:9736–9738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang L, Morita Y, Sakuragawa A, Isozaki A (2007) Inorganic speciation of As (III, V), Se (IV, VI) and Sb (III, V) in natural water with GF-AAS using solid phase extraction technology. Talanta 72:723–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhao M, Liu P (2008) Adsorption behavior of methylene blue on halloysite nanotubes. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 112:419–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhao Y, Abdullayev E, Vasiliev A, Lvov Y (2013) Halloysite nanotubule clay for efficient water purification. J Colloid Interface Sci 406:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Chemical TechnologyPoznan University of TechnologyPoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations