Short Ozonation of Lignocellulosic Waste as Energetically Favorable Pretreatment

  • Yan Rosen
  • Hadas Mamane
  • Yoram GerchmanEmail author


Lignocellulosic waste (here municipal trimmings) is a promising sustainable feedstock for ethanol production, but requires costly and polluting pretreatment, often resulting in toxic by-products. Ozonation, nonpolluting, effective pretreatment method, is not used commercially due to high energy requirements of ozone production at high ozone doses needed. Our results, however, demonstrated that low-dose ozonation (15 min, accumulated TOD = 318 mg L−1) of water-submerged waste resulted in improved enzymatic saccharification efficiency (31% of cellulose) compared to a non-ozonated sample (12%) although only 20% of the lignin was removed. Ozonation up to 90 min resulted in better conversion however exceptionally long ozonation (6 h and beyond) resulted in reduced conversion. These results suggest that contrary to common hypothesis, short ozonation could offer an effective and feasible pretreatment method for high sugar release without the need for delignification. In addition, the ozonation process was accompanied by changes in absorbance, mainly at 280 nm, making it a useful tool for process monitoring. Net calculated energy balance was positive for all ozonation regimes, with increased process efficiency at lower ozone doses. Furthermore, ozonation can be generated on-site and on demand, enabling decentralized pretreatment operated near the feed source, thus overcoming transportation costs.


Lignocellulosic waste Lignin Cellulose Ozone Ethanol Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), municipal trimmings 



We would like to thank Dr. Alex Golberg, Tel Aviv University, for his enormous help in the HPIC data analysis and for his advice. We also wish to thank Du-Pont Company for their donation of enzymes.

Funding Information

This research was conducted in the framework of the Israeli Ministry of National Infrastructure, Energy and Water Resources grant number 214-11-006, the Israeli Ministry of Environmental Protection grant number 132-3-4, and a scholarship from the Israeli Ministry of Science and Technology.

Supplementary material

12155_2019_9962_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1033 kb)


  1. 1.
    Saini JK, Saini R, Tewari L (2015) Lignocellulosic agriculture wastes as biomass feedstocks for second-generation bioethanol production: concepts and recent developments. 3Biotech 5:337–353. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Naik SN, Goud VV, Rout PK, Dalai AK (2010) Production of first and second generation biofuels: a comprehensive review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:578–597. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ayalon O, Elimelech E, Spenser J, Zaban H, Lev-On M, Lev-On P (2008) Bioethanol in Israel: global context, research, planning and policy. Samuel Neaman Institute, Haifa, IsraelGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gupta A, Verma JP (2015) Sustainable bio-ethanol production from agro-residues: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41:550–567. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mood SH, Golfeshan AH, Tabatabaei M, Jouzani GS, Najafi GH, Gholami M, Ardjmand M (2013) Lignocellulosic biomass to bioethanol, a comprehensive review with a focus on pretreatment. Renew Sust Energ Rev 27:77–93. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Menon V, Rao M (2012) Trends in bioconversion of lignocellulose: biofuels, platform chemicals & biorefinery concept. Prog Energy Combust Sci 38:522–550. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li X, Li M, Pu Y, Ragauskas AJ, Klett AS, Thies M, Zheng Y (2018) Inhibitory effects of lignin on enzymatic hydrolysis: the role of lignin chemistry and molecular weight. Renew Energy 123:664–674. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ximenes E, Kim Y, Mosier N, Dien B, Ladisch M (2011) Deactivation of cellulases by phenols. Enzym Microb Technol 48:54–60. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yoshida M, Liu Y, Uchida S, Kawarada K, Ukagami Y, Ichinose H, Kaneko S, Fukuda K (2008) Effects of cellulose crystallinity, hemicellulose, and lignin on the enzymatic hydrolysis of Miscanthus sinensis to monosaccharides. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 72(3):805–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abu Tayeh H, Levy-Shalev O, Azaizeh H, Dosoretz CG (2016) Subcritical hydrothermal pretreatment of olive mill solid waste for biofuel production. Bioresour Technol 199:164–172. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, Negro MJ (2010) Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol 101:4851–4861. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Travaini R, Martín-Juárez J, Lorenzo-Hernando A, Bolado-Rodríguez S (2016) Ozonolysis. An advantageous pretreatment for lignocellulosic biomass revisited. Bioresour Technol 199:2–12. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K (2008) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int J Mol Sci 9:1621–1651. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gnansounou E, Dauriat A (2010) Techno-economic analysis of lignocellulosic ethanol: a review. Bioresour Technol 101:4980–4991. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Greenhot Z (2015) Agriculture byproducts in Israel. Report. Ministry of Environmental Protection, IsraelGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Balan V (2014) Current challenges in commercially producing biofuels from lignocellulosic biomass. ISRN Biotech 463074:1–31. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hoigné J, Bader H (1983) Rate constants of reactions of ozone with organic and inorganic compounds in water—I: non-dissociating organic compounds. Water Res 17(2):173–183. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Balat M (2011) Production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic materials via the biochemical pathway. Energy Convers Manag 52:858–875. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peretz R, Gerchman Y, Mamane H (2017) Ozonation of tannic acid to model biomass pretreatment for bioethanol production. Bioresour Technol 241:1060–1066. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mvula E, von Sonntag C (2003) Ozonolysis of phenols in aqueous solution. Org Biomol Chem 1:1749–1756. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    von Gunten U (2003) Ozonation of drinking water. Part I. Oxidation kinetics and product formation. Water Res 37:1443–1467. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zucker I, Avisar D, Mamane H, Jekel M, Hübne U (2016) Determination of oxidant exposure during ozonation of secondary effluent to predict contaminant removal. Water Res 100:508–516. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    García-Cubero MT, González-Benito G, Indacoechea I, Coca M, Bolado S (2009) Effect of ozonolysis pretreatment on enzymatic digestibility of wheat and rye straw. Bioresour Technol 100:1608–1613. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vidal PF, Molinier J (1988) Ozonolysis of lignin—improvement of in vitro digestibility of poplar sawdust. Biomass 16:1–17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shi F, Xiang H, Li Y (2015) Combined pretreatment using ozonolysis and ball milling to improve enzymatic saccharification of corn straw. Bioresour Technol 179:444–451. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jönsson LJ, Alriksson B, Nilvebrant N (2013) Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification. Biotechnol Biofuels 6(16):1–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Neely WC (1984) Factors affecting the pretreatment of biomass with gaseous ozone. Biotechnol Bioeng 26:59–65. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ozonek J, Fijalkowski S, Polio I (1997) Exergy identification of energy utilization efficiency in an industrial process of ozone generation. Ozone Sci Engineer 19:201–226. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sugimoto T, Magara K, Hosoya S, Oosawa S, Shimoda T, Nishibori K (2009) Ozone pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: improvement of enzymatic susceptibility of softwood. Holzforschung 63:537–543. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mulakhudair AR, Hanotu J, Zimmerman W (2017) Exploiting ozonolysis-microbe synergy for biomass processing: application in lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment. Biomass Bioenergy 105:147–154. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Buffle MO, Schumacher J, Meylan S, Jekel M, von Gunten U (2006) Ozonation and advanced oxidation of wastewater: effect of O3 dose, pH, DOM and HO• scavengers on ozone decomposition and HO• generation. Ozone Sci Engineer 28:247–259. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Spectranomics Protocol (2011) Total phenol and tannin determination. Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Foster CE, Martin TM, Pauly M (2010) Comprehensive compositional analysis of plant cell walls (lignocellulosic biomass) part I: lignin. J Vis Exp 37:e1745. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Carrier M, Loppinet-Serani A, Denux D, Lasnier JM, Ham-Pichavant F, Cansell F, Aymonier C (2011) Thermogravimetric analysis as a new method to determine the lignocellulosic composition of biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 35:298–307. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Coward-Kelly G, Aiello-Mazzari C, Kim S, Granda C, Holtzapple M (2003) Suggested improvements to the standard filter paper assay used to measure cellulase activity. Biotechnol Bioeng 82(6):745–749. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Feeny PP (1968) Seasonal changes in the tannin content of oak leaves. Phytochemistry 7(5):871–880. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kukkola EM, Koutaniemi S, Pöllänen E, Gustafsson M, Karhunen P, Lundell TK, Saranpää P, Kilpeläinen I, Teeri TH, Fagerstedt KV (2004) The dibenzodioxocin lignin substructure is abundant in the inner part of the secondary wall in Norway spruce and silver birch xylem. Planta 218(3):497–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Abdul-Latif MH (2013) Qualitative and quantitative determination of lignin in different types of Iraqi Phoenix dactylifera Date palm pruning woods. J Nat Sci Res 3(6):71–77Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Saroj DP, Kumar A, Bose P, Tare V, Dhopavkar Y (2005) Mineralization of some natural refractory organic compounds by biodegradation and ozonation. Water Res 39:1921–1933. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Christensen JM, Rusch KA, Malone RE (2000) Development of a model for describing accumulation of color and subsequent destruction by ozone in a freshwater recirculating aquaculture system. J World Aquacult Soc 31(2):167–174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Brolin A, Gierer J, Zhang Y (1993) On the selectivity of ozone delignification of softwood kraft pulps. Wood Sci Technol 27:115–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Elovitz MS, von Gunten U, Kaiser HP (2000) Hydroxyl radical/ozone ratios during ozonation processes. II. The effect of temperature, pH, alkalinity, and DOM properties. Ozone Sci Engineer 22:123–150. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lee JM, Jameel H, Venditti RA (2010) Effect of ozone and autohydrolysis pretreatments on enzymatic digestibility of coastal Bermuda grass. BioResources 5(2):1084–1101Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Porter School of Environmental Studies (PSES), Faculty of Exact SciencesTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  3. 3.Department of Biology and Environment, Faculty of Natural SciencesUniversity of Haifa – OranimTivonIsrael

Personalised recommendations