BioEnergy Research

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 534–547 | Cite as

A Survey of Bioenergy Research in Forest Service Research and Development

  • Alan W. RudieEmail author
  • Carl J. Houtman
  • Leslie H. Groom
  • David L. Nicholls
  • J. Y. Zhu


Forest biomass represents 25–30 % of the annual biomass available in the USA for conversion into bio-based fuels, bio-based chemicals, and bioproducts in general. The USDA Forest Service Research and Development (R&D) has been focused on producing products from forest biomass since its inception in 1905, with direct combustion, solid sawn lumber, pulp and paper, ethanol as fuel, and silvichemicals all among the mission areas of product research and development. The renewed national interest in biomass conversion to fuels and chemicals is supportive of the most critical need of USDA Forest Service R&D, uses for small-diameter trees and other forest biomass that needs to be removed in the fuel mitigation–fire suppression and forest restoration work of the USDA Forest Service. This paper will summarize the recent USDA Forest Service research on direct combustion, fuel pellets, and conversion of forest biomass to ethanol, both as stand-alone biorefinery processes and as an addition to the traditional wood pulping process.


Woody biomass Forest service Bioenergy Biorefinery Prehydrolysis Gasification Co-firing 


  1. 1.
    DE-FG36-06GO16108, M001, Value prior to pulping, final report. October 8, 2010Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Houtman C, Horn E (2011) Pilot trials of hemicelluloses extraction prior to thermomechanical pulp production. Part 1. TAPPI J 10(5):21–28Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atack D, Heitner C, Karnis A (1978) Ultra-high yield pulping of eastern black spruce. Part 2. Sven Pap 81(5):164–141Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bilek EM, Houtman C, Ince P (2011) Evaluation of a value prior to pulping-thermomechanical pulp business concept. Part 2. TAPPI J 10(5):31–38Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harris EE, Kline AA (1949) Hydrolysis of wood cellulose with hydrochloric acid and sulfur dioxide and the decomposition of its hydrolytic products. J Phys Chem 53(3):344–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wayman M, Tallevi A, Winsborrow B (1984) Hydrolysis of biomass by sulfur dioxide. Biomass 6:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mamers H, Menz DN (1984) Explosion pretreatment of Pinus radiate woodchips for the production of fermentation substrates. Appita 37(8):644–649Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boussaid AL, Esteghlalian AR, Gregg DJ, Lee LH, Saddler JN (2000) Steam pretreatment of Douglas-fir wood chips. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84–86:693–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhu JY, Zhu W, O’Bryan P, Dien BS, Tian S, Gleisner R, Pan XJ (2010) Ethanol production from SPORL-pretreated lodgepole pine: preliminary evaluation of mass balance and process energy efficiency. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86:1355–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cheng J, Leu SY, Zhu JY, Gleisner R (2015) High titer and yield of ethanol production from undetoxified whole slurry Douglas fir forest residue using pH profiling in SPORL. Biotechnol Biofuels 8:22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhou H, Lan T, Dien BS, Hector RE, Zhu JY (2014) Comparison of five Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for ethanol production from SPORL-pretreated lodgepole pine. Biotechnol Prog 30(5):1076–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhou H, Zhu JY, Luo X, Leu S-Y, Wu X, Gleisner R, Dien BS, Hector RE, Yang D, Qiu X, Horn E, Negron J (2013) Bioconversion of beetle-killed lodgepole pine using SPORL: process scale-up design, lignin coproduct, and high solids fermentation without detoxification. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:16057–16065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhou H, Lou H, Yang D, Zhu JY, Qiu X (2013) Lignosulfonate to enhance enzyme saccharification of lignocelluloses: role of molecular weight and substrate lignin. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:8464–8470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhu JY, Chandra MS, Gu F, Gleisner R, Reiner R, Sessions J, Marrs G, Gao J, Anderson D (2015) Using sulfite chemistry for robust conversion of Douglas-fir forest residue to bioethanol at high titer and lignosulfonate: a pilot-scale evaluation. Bioresour Technol 179:390–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lamers P, Jacobson J Mohammad R Wright C (2014) Expected international demand for woody and herbaceous feedstock. Idaho National Laboratories Report No. EXT-14-33968. 35 pGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elder T, Groom LH (2011) Pilot-scale gasification of woody biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 35:3522–3528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dogru M, Howarth C, Akay RG, Keskinler B, Malik AA (2002) Gasification of hazelnut shells in a downdraft gasifier. Energy 27(5):415–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zainal ZA, Rifau A, Quadir GA, Seetharamu KN (2002) Experimental investigation of a downdraft biomass gasifier. Biomass Bioenergy 23(4):283–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tinaut FV, Melgar A, Pérez JF, Horrillo A (2008) Effect of biomass particle size and air superficial velocity on the gasification process in a downdraft fixed bed gasifier. An experimental and modelling study. Fuel Process Technol 89(11):1076–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gai C, Dong Y (2012) Experimental study on non-woody biomass gasification in a downdraft gasifier. Int J Hydrog Energy 37(6):4935–4944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hanaoka T, Inoue S, Uno S, Ogi T, Minow T (2005) Effect of woody biomass components on air-steam gasification. Biomass Bioenergy 28(1):69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Elder T, Groom LH, Labbé N, Bhattacharya P (2013) Gasification of southern forest resources. Proceedings from Sun Grant National Conference: Science for Biomass Feedstock Production and Utilization, New OrleansGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eberhardt TL, Pan H, Groom LH, So CL (2011) Characterization and partitioning of the char ash collected after the processing of pine wood chips in a pilot-scale gasification unit. In: Shelly JR, Ed. Woody biomass utilization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Woody Biomass Utilization, Forest Products Society, Starkville, MS (August 4–5, 2009); pp. 33–38Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eberhardt TL, Pan H (2012) Elemental analyses of chars isolated from a biomass gasifier fly ash. Fuel 98:600–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eberhardt TL, Pan H (2013) Analysis of the fly ash from the processing of wood chips in a pilot-scale downdraft gasifier: comparison of inorganic constituents determined by PIXE and ICP-AES. Biomass Bioenergy 51:163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jackson MA, Eberhardt TL, Boateng AA, Mullen CA, Groom LH (2013) Evaluation of biochars by temperature programmed oxidation/mass spectrometry. BioResources 8(4):5461–5474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pan H, Eberhardt TL (2011) Characterization of fly ash from the gasification of wood and assessment for its application as a soil amendment. 6;4:3987-4004Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jeong CY, Wang JJ, Dodla SK, Eberhardt TL, Groom L (2012) Effect of biochar amendment on tylosin adsorption-desorption and transport in two different soils. J Environ Qual 41:1185–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sharma P, Elder T, Groom L, Spivey JJ (2014) Effect of structural promoters on Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of biomass derived syngas. Top Catal 57:526–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mai K, Elder T, Groom LH, Spivey JJ (2015) Fe-based Fischer Tropsch synthesis of biomass-derived syngas: effect of synthesis method. Catal Commun 65:76–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Anderson N, Jones JG, Page-Dumroese D, McCollum D, Baker S, Loeffler D, Chung W (2013) A comparison of producer gas, biochar, and activated carbon from two distributed scale thermochemical conversion systems used to process forest biomass. Energies 6:164–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brar JS, Singh K, Zondlo J (2013). Technical challenges and opportunities in cogasification of coal and biomass. In: Miller, Gary W.; Schuler, Thomas M.; Gottschalk, Kurt W.; Brooks, John R.; Grushecky, Shawn T, Spong BD, Rentch JS, eds. Proceedings, 18th Central Hardwood Forest Conference; 2012 March 26-28; Morgantown, WV; Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-117. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 5-13Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Aguilar FX, Goerndt ME, Song N, Shifley S (2012) Internal, external and location factors influencing cofiring of biomass with coal in the U.S. northern region. Energy Econ 34:1790–1798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Goerndt ME, Aguilar FX, Skog KE (2015) Potential for coal power plants to co-fire with woody biomass in the U.S. North, 2010-2030: a technical document supporting the Northern Forest Futures Project. USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, General Technical Report, FPL-GTR-237, 2015; 24 pGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Goerndt ME, Aguilar FX, Skog K (2013) Drivers of biomass co-firing in U.S. coal-fired power plants. Biomass Bioenergy 58:158–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Goerndt ME, Aguilar FX, Miles P, Shifley S, Song N, Stelzer H (2012) Regional assessment of woody biomass- physical availability as an energy feedstock for combined combustion in the US northern region. J For 2012:138–148Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Goerndt ME, Aguilar FX, Skog K (2013) Resource potential for renewable energy generation from co-firing of woody biomass with coal in the Northern U.S. Biomass Bioenergy 59(2013):348–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Loeffler D, Anderson N (2014) Emissions tradeoffs associated with cofiring forest biomass with coal: a case study in Colorado, USA. Appl Energy 113:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mitchell D, Rummer R (2007) Processing woody debris biomass for co-milling with pulverized coal. In: ASABE 2007 Annual International Meeting, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 17–20 June 2007. 6 p.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nicholls DL, Patterson SE, Uloth E (2006) Wood and coal cofiring in interior Alaska: utilizing woody biomass from wildland defensible-space fire treatments and other sources. Res. Note PNW-RN-551. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 15 pGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nicholls D, Zerbe J (2012) Cofiring biomass and coal for fossil fuel reduction and other benefits—status of North American facilities in 2010. PNW-GTR-867. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 22 pGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mitchell D, Elder T (2010) Torrefaction? What’s that? In: Proceedings of 2010 COFE: 33rd Annual Meeting of the Council on Forest Engineering. Auburn, AL: June 6–9, 2010. [CD-ROM] 1–7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan W. Rudie
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carl J. Houtman
    • 1
  • Leslie H. Groom
    • 2
  • David L. Nicholls
    • 3
  • J. Y. Zhu
    • 1
  1. 1.Forest Products LaboratoryUSDA Forest ServiceMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Southern Research Station, Alexandria Forest CenterUSDA Forest ServicePinevilleUSA
  3. 3.Pacific Northwest Research StationUSDA Forest ServiceSitkaUSA

Personalised recommendations