Advertisement

BioEnergy Research

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 682–690 | Cite as

Process Analysis of Alkaline Flocculation Harvesting for Chaetoceros muelleri and Scenedesmus quadricauda

  • Shuhao HuoEmail author
  • Zhongming Wang
  • Shunni Zhu
  • Fengjie Cui
  • Bin Zou
  • Feng Wang
  • Zhenhong YuanEmail author
  • Renjie Dong
  • Pengxiang Zhao
Article

Abstract

Alkaline flocculation could be an attractive microalgae harvesting method, because it is low-cost, low energy consumption, and non-toxic to microalgal cells, and the high pH effectively sterilizes the microalgal biomass as well as the process water. In this paper, the mechanism of alkaline flocculation process and the difference between the two strains marine diatom Chaetoceros muelleri #862 and freshwater algae Scenedesmus quadricauda #507 were analyzed. The particle size of C. muelleri #862 cells increased linearly with the increasing pH value which increased dramatically by nearly fivefolds after alkaline flocculation. When pH was below 10.5, the absolute value of zeta potential on the surface of C. muelleri #862 increased rapidly, and also the conductivity of the solution declined quickly. The alkaline flocculation of C. muelleri #862 was mainly attributed to the production of Mg(OH)2 rather than calcium phosphate or calcium hydroxide. For the strain S. quadricauda #507, the cells still existed integrally as normal cells after alkaline flocculation. Firstly, with the increasing of pH in the solution, the absolute value of zeta potential had not declined. When pH was around 10.8, the absolute value of zeta potential had declined abruptly and the solution conductivity was increasing all the time. The cell wall of S. quadricauda #507 with the high content of cellulose Iα and low crystallization degree was good for the next step of saccharification or oil extraction.

Keywords

Microalgae harvesting Alkaline flocculation Mechanism Characterization techniques 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21206177, 21506084), the Senior Talent Scientific Research Initial Funding Project of Jiangsu University (14JDG024), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20140540), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014 M551519, 2015 T80502), the State Grid Science and Technology Program (SGECS56-2014), and the key Laboratory of Renewable Energy, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. y507k11001).

Authors’ Contribution

Shuhao Huo wrote the main part of the paper and performed the experiments. Zhongming Wang, Shunni Zhu, Renjie Dong, and Zhenhong Yuan revised the paper. Other authors read and approved the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Lavoie A, De la Noüe J (1987) Harvesting of Scenedesmus obliquus in wastewaters: auto or bioflocculation? Biotechnol Bioeng 30:852–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shelef G, Sukenik A, Green M (1984) Microalgae harvesting and processing: a literature review. SERI/STR–231–2396. Solar Energy Research Institute, Golden ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nurdogan Y, Oswald WJ (1995) Enhanced nutrient removal in high-rate ponds. Water Sci Technol 31:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vandamme D, Foubert I, Fraeye I, Meesschaert B, Muylaert K (2012) Flocculation of Chlorella vulgaris induced by high pH: role of magnesium and calcium and practical implications. Bioresour Technol 105:114–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu Z, Zhu Y, Huang W, Zhang C, Li T, Zhang Y, Li A (2012) Evaluation of flocculation induced by pH increase for harvesting microalgae and reuse of flocculated medium. Bioresour Technol 110:496–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sukenik A, Shelef G (1984) Algal autoflocculation—verification and proposed mechanism. Biotechnol Bioeng 26:142–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alexeev V (1987) Analyse quantitative. Editions Mir, Moscou. Lavoie, A., De la Noüe JGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schlesinger A, Eisenstadt D, Bar-Gil A, Carmely H, Einbinder S, Gressel J (2012) Inexpensive non-toxic flocculation of microalgae contradicts theories; overcoming a major hurdle to bulk algal production. Biotechnol Adv 30:1023–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huo S, Wang Z, Zhu S, Cui F, Zou B, You W, Yuan Z, Dong R (2014) Optimization of alkaline flocculation for harvesting of Scenedesmus quadricauda #507 and Chaetoceros muelleri #862. Energies 7(9):6186–6195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rippka R, Deruelles J, Waterbury J, Herdman M, Stanier R (1979) Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. J Gen Microbiol 111:1–61Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guillard RRL (1975) Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates. In: Smith WL, Chanley MH (eds) Culture of Marine Invertebrate Animals. Plenum Press, New York, pp 26–60Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhou W, Cao WX, Li C, Wang GF, Sun ZH, Zhao J (2010) Effects of algal cell structure on the optical properties of phytoplankton. J Trop Oceanogr 29:33–38Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Svensen Ø, Stamnes JJ, Kildemo M, Aas LM, Erga SR, Frette Ø (2011) Mueller matrix measurements of algae with different shape and size distributions. Appl Opt 50:5149–5157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bernhardt H, Hoyer O, Schell H, Lusse B (1985) Reaction mechanisms involved in the influence of algogenic matter on flocculation. Z Wasser-Abwasser-Forsch 18:67–75Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Henderson RK, Parsons SA, Jefferson B (2010) The impact of differing cell and algogenic organic matter (AOM) characteristics on the coagulation and flotation of algae. Water Res 44(195):3617–3624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elmaleh S, Coma J, Grasmick A, Bourgade L (1991) Magnesium induced algal flocculation in a fluidized bed. Water Sci Technol 23:1695–1702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yahi H, Elmaleh S, Coma J (1994) Algal flocculation-sedimentation by pH increase in a continuous reactor. Water Sci Technol 30:259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Elmaleh S, Coma J, Bourgade L (1992) Algal flocculation in a magnesium exchanger fluidized bed. Wat Sci Technol 26:1689–1696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Uytterhoeven JB, Schoonheydt R, Liengme BW, Hall WK (1969) Studies of the hydrogen held by solids: XVI. Infrared spectroscopy of X- and Y-type zeolites containing univalent and divalent cations. J Catal 13:425–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Phoochinda W, White DA (2003) Removal of algae using froth flotation. Environ Technol 24:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Henderson R, Parsons SA, Jefferson B (2008) The impact of algal properties and pre-oxidation on solid–liquid separation of algae. Water Res 42:1827–1845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Danquah MK, Gladman B, Moheimani N, Forde GM (2009) Microalgal growth characteristics and subsequent influence on dewatering efficiency. Chem Eng J 151:73–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee R E (2008) Phycology (4th Edition), Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Benjamin TS, Robert HD (2012) Sedimentation of algae flocculated using naturally-available, magnesium-based flocculants. Algal Res 1:32–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vandamme D, Foubert I, Meesschaert B, Muylaert K (2010) Flocculation of microalgae using cationic starch. J Appl Phycol 22:525–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ganesh Kumar C, Joo HS, Choi JW, Koo YM, Chang CS (2004) Purification and characterization of an extracellular polysaccharide from haloalkalophilic Bacillus sp. I–450. Enzyme Microb Technol 34:673–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bertsch L, Habgood HW (1963) An infrared spectroscopic study of the comdsorption of water and carbon dioxide by Linde molecular sieve X1. J Phys Chem 67:1621–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fengel, M (1991) Ludwig, Das Papier 45: 45–51Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bayramoğlu G, Celik G, Arica MY (2006) Biosorption of Reactive Blue 4 dye by native and treated fungus Phanerocheate chrysosporium: Batch and continuous flow system studies. J Hazard Mater 137:1689–1697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pouchard C J (1985) Aldrieh Library of FT–IRSPeetra.Ed.l Vol.2 Aldrieh Chemical Company Inc.,Milwaukee, WI, PP1567Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nelson WH (1991) Modern techniques for rapid microbiological analysis. VCH Publishers, New York, p 26Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Williams D, Fleming I (2007) Spectroscopic methods in organic chemistry. McGraw–Hill Education. 6th editionGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hayashi N, Sugiyama J, Okano T, Ishihara M (1997) Selective degradation of the cellulose I–alpha component in Cladophora cellulose with Trichoderma viride cellulase. Carbohyd Res 305:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Atalla RH, Van der Hart DL (1984) Native cellulose: a composite of two distinct crystalline forms. Science 223:283–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Van der Hart DL, Atalla RH (1984) Studies of microstructure in native celluloses using solid-state carbon-13 NMR. Macromolecules 17:1465–1472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Daroch M, Geng S, Wang G (2013) Recent advances in liquid biofuel production from algal feedstocks. Appl Energy 102:1371–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shuhao Huo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Zhongming Wang
    • 2
  • Shunni Zhu
    • 2
  • Fengjie Cui
    • 1
  • Bin Zou
    • 1
  • Feng Wang
    • 1
  • Zhenhong Yuan
    • 2
    Email author
  • Renjie Dong
    • 3
  • Pengxiang Zhao
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Food and Biological EngineeringJiangsu UniversityZhenjiangChina
  2. 2.Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences; Key Laboratory of Renewable EnergyChinese Academy of SciencesGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.College of EngineeringChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
  4. 4.Beijing Biomass Energy Technology CenterState Grid Energy Conservation Service Ltd.BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations