Attitudes Toward Married Persons’ Surnames in Twenty-First Century Japan
- 12 Downloads
Through Article 750 of the Japanese Civil Code, Japan is the only developed country to require that a married couple must choose either the husband’s or the wife’s surname upon marriage. We examine how traditional gender ideology and preference for the three-generation family household are associated with the level of support for conjugal surname sharing, from full support for the wife taking her husband’s surname to support for neither the wife or husband changing their name. We estimate generalized ordered logit models with data from the 2000–2003, 2006, and 2010 Japanese General Social Survey. Findings indicate that those who hold more traditional gender ideology are more likely to endorse surname sharing at all levels. Those who prefer the traditional extended family household are more likely to acknowledge at least some merit in a married couple sharing a surname, but they are less likely to say that the wife should take her husband’s surname without question. Attitudes toward conjugal surname sharing may have important symbolic implications for gender equality as well as potential impact on the surname law.
KeywordsSurnames Marriage Gender Gender ideology Traditional family form Japan
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Hiromi Taniguchi and Gayle Kaufman declares no conflict of interest.
This study is based on an analysis of national survey datasets accessed through the ICPSR, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (https://www.icpsr.umich.edu). These datasets are de-identified, and consent of survey respondents can be reasonably presumed.
- 1.Boxer, D., & Gritsenko, E. (2005). Women and surnames across cultures: Reconstituting identity in marriage. Women and Language, 28(2), 1–11.Google Scholar
- 3.Calamur, K. (2015). The 19th-century Japanese law on last names. The Atlantic. Retrieved December 16, 2015 from https://www.theatlantic.com.
- 6.Davis, A. N., Street, C., & Carlo, G. (2016). Familism. In C. L. Shehan (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of family studies (Vol. 1, pp. 701–704). West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 8.Emrich, C. G., Denmark, F. L., & den Hartog, D. N. (2004). Cross-cultural differences in gender egalitarianism: Implications for societies, organizations, and leaders. In R. J. House, P. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds.), Culture, leadership and organisations: The globe study of 62 societies (pp. 343–394). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- 12.Hashimoto, A., & Traphagan, J. W. (2008). Changing Japanese families. In A. Hashimoto & J. W. Traphagan (Eds.), Imagined families, lived families: Culture and kinship in contemporary Japan (pp. 1–12). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- 13.Hongo, J. (2015). Japan’s top court rules married couples must have same surname. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved December 16, 2015 from https://www.wsj.com.
- 14.ICPSR. (2016). Survey of midlife development in Japan (MIDJA 2), 2012 No. 36427. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
- 15.Ishida, K. (2018). Why does surname matter? Past, present, and future prospect of family law from a gender perspective in Japan. Journal of Korean Law, 18, 59–81.Google Scholar
- 16.Kato, A. (2013). The Japanese family system: Change, continuity, and regionality over the twentieth century. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research WP 2013-004. Rostock, Germany.Google Scholar
- 18.Komatsu, R. (2018). Support for married couples’ dual-surname system edges up. Asahi Shinbun. Retrieved June 13, 2018 from http://www.asahi.com.
- 19.Krogness, K. J. (2014). Jus koseki: Household registration and Japanese citizenship. The Asia-Pacific Journal|Japan Focus 12(35). https://apjjf.org. Retrieved 15 January 2018.
- 22.Matsui, S. (2011). Why is the Japanese Supreme Court so conservative? Washington University Law Review, 88(6), 1375–1423.Google Scholar
- 23.McGee, O. (2015). Why married couples in Japan must have same surname. Japan Today. Retrieved October 1, 2015 from https://japantoday.com.
- 24.Miyamoto, Y., Ninomiya, S., & Shin, K-Y. (2011). The Family, koseki, and the individual: Japanese and Korean Experiences. The Asia-Pacific Journal| Japan Focus 9(36). https://apjjf.org. Retrieved 7 June 2018.
- 29.Pateman, C. (1989). The disorder of women. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- 34.Shimoju, A. (2016). The illness called family II (Kazoku to iuyamai 2). Tokyo: Gentosha.Google Scholar
- 35.Shin, K-y. (2008). ‘The personal is the political’: Women’s surname change in Japan. Journal of Korean Law, 8, 161–179.Google Scholar
- 36.Shin, K-y. (2009). Fufubessei movement in Japan: Thinking women resistance and subjectivity. In C. Bose & M. Kim (Eds.), Global gender research: Transnational perspectives (pp. 141–148). New York: Rougledge.Google Scholar
- 42.Theodorson, G. A., & Theodorson, A. G. (1969). A modern dictionary of sociology. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
- 47.Traphagan, J. W. (2004). Curse of the successor: Filial piety vs. marriage among rural Japanese. In C. Ikels (Ed.), Filial piety: Practice and discourse in contemporary East Asia (pp. 198–216). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- 48.Ueno, C. (2009). The modern family in Japan: Its rise and fall. Victoria: TransPacific Press.Google Scholar
- 49.United Nations, CEDAW. (2002). Fifth periodic report on implementation of convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women (Japan). http://www.un.org. Retrieved 13 June 2018.
- 50.United Nations, Human Rights Council. (2017). National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 16/21, Japan, 2017, A/HRC/WG.6/28/JPN/1; Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, 28th session. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/JPIndex.aspx. Retrieved 18 June 2018.
- 53.World Economic Forum. (2017). The global gender gap report. https://www.weforum.org. Retrieved 6 January 2019.