Advertisement

Gender Issues

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 392–414 | Cite as

Beyond Hidden Figures: Shining a Spotlight on Constructed Hierarchies of Gender, Age, and Elementary Mathematics

  • Lynette DeAun GuzmánEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

This article focuses on conversations about gender and mathematics among other intersecting identities such as age, education level, and professional expertise. I used positioning theory to unpack a conversation at a science museum (between museum volunteer John, prospective teacher Ann, and myself) to share a story about gender and mathematics. I argue that the impact of this conversation from our perspectives as young women who do work in elementary mathematics education should be made visible to recognize and address inequities for women and girls within mathematics and mathematics education spaces. Implications for elementary teacher education include providing opportunities for prospective teachers to share their stories and gendered experiences with attention to intersections of age, gender, and connected disciplinary narratives (in this case, mathematics).

Keywords

Positioning Gender and mathematics Mathematical identities Elementary teacher education Dominant narratives 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by the National Science Foundation (DGE-1424871). This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE-1424871. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Lynette Guzmán has received a research Grant from the National Science Foundation.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Alderton, J. (2017). Kelly’s story: Transformative identity work in primary mathematics teacher education. Gender and Education.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2017.1336204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understanding that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449–466.  https://doi.org/10.1086/461626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bishop, J. P. (2012). “She’s always been the smart one. I’ve always been the dumb one:” Identities in the mathematics classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(1), 34–74.  https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.1.0034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C. A., Underhill, R. G., Jones, D., & Agard, P. A. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3), 194–222.  https://doi.org/10.2307/749118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Britzman, D. P. (2000). “The question of belief”: Writing poststructural ethnography. In E. A. St. Pierre & W. S. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 27–40). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buschor, C. B., Kappler, C., Frei, A. K., & Berweger, S. (2014). I want to be a scientist/a teacher: Students’ perceptions of career decision-making in gender-typed, non-traditional areas of work. Gender and Education, 26(7), 743–758.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2014.970615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chernin, P., Gigliotti, D., Melfi, T., Topping, J., Williams, P., & Melfi, T. (2016). Hidden figures [motion picture]. New York: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (2012). The Mathematical Education of Teachers II. Providence, RI and Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society and Mathematical Association of America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1279.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dyson, A. H., & Genishi, C. (2005). On the case: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Emerson, R., Fretz, R., & Shaw, L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Esmonde, I. (2009). Explanations in mathematics classrooms: A discourse analysis. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 9(2), 86–99.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150902942072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. (2013). Power in numbers: Student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 288–315. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/publications/journal-for-research-in-mathematics-education/.
  17. 17.
    Gutiérrez, R. (2012). Context matters: How should we conceptualize equity in mathematics education? In B. Herbel-Eisenmann, J. Choppin, D. Wagner, & D. Pimm (Eds.), Equity in discourse for mathematics education (pp. 28–50). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gutiérrez, R. (2013). Why (urban) mathematics teachers need political knowledge. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 6(2), 7–19. Retrieved from http://education.gsu.edu/JUME.
  19. 19.
    Harré, R., Moghaddam, F. M., Cairnie, T. P., Rothbart, D., & Sabat, S. R. (2009). Recent advances in positioning theory. Theory and Psychology, 19(1), 5–31.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354308101417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21(4), 393–407.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1991.tb00203.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hooks, B. (2013). Writing beyond race: Living theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hottinger, S. N. (2016). Inventing the mathematician: Gender, race, and our cultural understanding of mathematics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2011). How Brianna became bossy and Kofi came out smart: Understanding the trajectories of identity and engagement for two group leaders in a project-based mathematics classroom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(3), 207–225.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2011.595881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Larnell, G. V. (2016). More than just skill: Examining mathematics identities, racialized narratives, and remediation among black undergraduates. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(3), 233–269.  https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.3.0233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leyva, L. A. (2017). Unpacking the male superiority myth and masculinization of mathematics at the intersections: A review of research on gender in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 397–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    LópezLeiva, C. A., & Khisty, L. L. (2014). “Juntos pero no revueltos”: Microaggressions and language in the mathematics education of non-dominant Latinas/os. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(2), 421–438.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0105-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Martin, D., & McGee, E. O. (2011). “You would not believe what I have to go through to prove my intellectual value!”: Stereotype management among academically successful Black mathematics and engineering students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(6), 1347–1389.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211423972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marx, S. (2006). Revealing the invisible: Confronting passive racism in teacher education. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    McGee, E. O. (2013). Young, Black, gifted, and stereotyped. High School Journal, 96(3), 253–263.  https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2013.0011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mewborn, D. (2001). Teachers content knowledge, teacher education, and their effects on the preparation of elementary teachers in the United States. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 3(1), 28–36. Retrieved from https://www.merga.net.au/ojs/index.php/mted/index.
  32. 32.
    Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nasir, N. S., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2013). Power, identity, and mathematical practices outside and inside school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 264–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nasir, N. S., & Shah, N. (2011). On defense: African American males making sense of racialized narratives in mathematics education. Journal of African American Males in Education, 2(1), 24–45. Retrieved from http://journalofafricanamericanmales.com/.
  36. 36.
    Solnit, R. (2014). Men explain things to me. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzen & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Valero, P. (2004). Postmodernism as an attitude of critique to dominant mathematics education research. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 35–54). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Walkerdine, V. (1998). Counting girls out: Girls and mathematics (New ed.). Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kremen School of Education and Human DevelopmentCalifornia State University, FresnoFresnoUSA

Personalised recommendations