Cultural and Religious Barriers Influencing the Participation of Women in Research: A Study from Jordan
To assess the general attitude toward women’s participation in research studies in Jordan and determine the various cultural and religious issues that could impact the rate of inclusion of Arab and Muslim women in research studies, a descriptive cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey study was conducted among Jordanian university students using a 17-item opinion questionnaire. A total of 1265 students from different professional disciplines completed the questionnaire. The majority of the respondents (69.1%) believed that females in Jordan do not have full autonomy regarding their decision to participate in research studies. Study findings also showed that females are more likely to avoid participation in research studies that require staying outside the home or involve direct interaction between a researcher and study participants. Females would prefer to deal with female research assistants when participating in research studies. More effort is required to encourage and enhance the rate of participation in research studies among women in Jordan and, probably, other Middle Eastern societies. When designing and conducting research studies in these countries, researchers should seriously consider the cultural and religious beliefs.
KeywordsWomen Research studies Attitude Students Jordan
The authors thank Dr. Omar Khabour, Professor in the Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences at Jordan University of Science and Technology, for his contribution to the editing and review of this manuscript.
This research project was supported by Grant #5R25TW010026-02 from the Fogarty International Center of the US National Institutes of Health on behalf of the Research Ethics Program in Jordan.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.ACOG. (2015). Ethical considerations for including women as research participants. Committee Opinion No. 646. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2015(126), e100–e107.Google Scholar
- 3.Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2016). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 7.El Feki, S., Heilman, B., & Barker, G. (2017). Understanding masculinities: Results from the International Men and Gender Equality Survey (IMAGES)—Middle East and North Africa. Cairo: UN Women and Promundo-US.Google Scholar
- 8.Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. (2018). Title 45 public welfare. Government publishing Office, USA, July-19-2018. Accessed May 10, 2019, from https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?gp=&SID=83cd09e1c0f5c6937cd9d7513160fc3f&pitd=20180719&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title45/45tab_02.tpl.
- 13.Mastroianni, A. C., Faden, R. R., Federman, D. D., & Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Ethical and Legal Issues Relating to the Inclusion of Women in Clinical Studies. (1994). NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 Public Law 103-43. Women and health research: Ethical and legal issues of including women in clinical studies (Vol. I). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- 14.National Institutes of Health. (2015). Consideration of sex as a biological variable in NIH-funded research. Notice Number: NOT-OD-15-102. Accessed May 17, 2019, from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not-od-15-102.html.
- 15.Panel on Research Ethics. (2014). Fairness and equity in research participation, Chapter 4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.Google Scholar
- 17.Purnell, L. D. (2013). Transcultural health care: A culturally competent approach. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.Google Scholar