Advertisement

Gender Issues

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 254–286 | Cite as

Financial Inclusion Through Public Works Program: Does Gender-Based Violence Make a Difference?

Original Article
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

The study investigates the impact of gender-related violence on financial inclusion. Exploiting the staggered rollout of a major public works program across Indian districts, we find evidence that households in states with gender-related violence are less likely to own a bank account, notwithstanding the fact that districts in these states were early implementers of the public works program. These findings are however, different after the government launched a massive program to promote universal financial inclusion. To be more specific, we find evidence of an increase in account ownership consistent during this period by over 100 percentage points, although the use of bank account by working women declines significantly. These findings of increased access are consistent with the bargaining theory, which suggests by gaining greater resources, women also gain more power. However, low use of accounts highlights the theory of male backlash as a response to undermined economic role at home. Overall, these results suggest that any attempt at ensuring universal financial inclusion needs to adequately take on board the aspect of gender-related violence, which can be the outcome of not only economic, but also social and cultural factors.

Keywords

Financial inclusion Violence Bargaining Male backlash India 

JEL Classification

D 12 J 12 J 16 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to profusely thank, without implicating, two anonymous referees for the incisive comments on an earlier draft, which greatly improved the exposition and analysis. Thanks are also due to Alexander Moler for the data support and certain clarifications on the variables. Any remaining errors are the authors’ own responsibility.

References

  1. 1.
    Acharya, V., Eisert, T., Eufinger, C., & Hirsch, C. (2015). Whatever it takes: The real effects of unconventional monetary policy. Paper presented at the 16th Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference (November 5–6). IMF: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen, F., Demirguc-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., & Martinez Peria, M. S. (2016). The foundations of financial inclusion: Understanding ownership and use of formal accounts. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 27, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amaral, S., Bandyopadhyay, S., & Sensarma, R. (2015). Employment programmes for the poor and female empowerment: The effect of NREGS on gender-based violence in India. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 27, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anand, M. (2009). Gender in social work education and practice in India. Social Work Education, 28, 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ardic, O.P., Heimann, M. & Mylenko, N. (2011). Access to financial services and the financial inclusion agenda around the world: A cross-country analysis with a new dataset. Policy Research Working Paper 5537. The World Bank: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Azam, M (2012). The impact of Indian job guarantee scheme on labor market outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6548. Institute for Study of Labor: Bonn.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Banerjee, A. V., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kinnan, C. (2015). The miracle of microfinance: Evidence from a randomized evaluation. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7, 22–53.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Basu, P. (2003). Improving access to finance for India’s rural poor. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2007). Reaching out: Access to and use of banking services across countries. Journal of Financial Economics, 85, 234–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Martinez Peria, M. S. (2008). Banking services for everyone? Barriers to bank access and use around the world. World Bank Economic Review, 22, 397–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berg, E, Bhattacharyya, S., Durgam, R. & Ramachandra, M. (2012). Can rural public works affect agricultural wages? Evidence from India. CSAE Working Paper No. 5. University of Oxford: UK.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berger, A. N., Klapper, L., Soledad Peria, M. S., & Zaidi, R. (2008). Bank ownership and banking relationships. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 17, 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Besley, T., Folke, O., Persson, T. & Rickne, J. (2012). Gender quotas and the crisis of the mediocre man: Theory and evidence from Sweden. IFN Working Paper No. 985.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bhattacharya, P. (2010). Economic development, gender inequality and demographic outcomes: Evidence from India. Population and Development Review, 32, 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bloch, F., & Rao, V. (2002). Terror as a bargaining instrument: A case study of dowry violence in India. American Economic Review, 92, 1029–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burgess, R., & Pande, R. (2005). Do rural banks matter? Evidence from the Indian social banking experiment. American Economic Review, 95, 780–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chattopadhyay, R., & Duflo, E. (2004). Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica, 72, 1409–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chin, Y.-M. (2012). Male backlash, bargaining or exposure reduction? Women’s working status and physical spousal violence in India. Journal of Population Economics, 25, 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chopra, Y., Prabhala, N. R. & Tantri, P. (2017). Bank accounts for the unbanked: Evidence from a big bang experiment. Working Paper No. 2919091. University of Maryland: Washington.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cuberes, D., & Teignier, M. (2014). Gender inequality and economic growth: A critical review. Journal of International Development, 26, 260–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dasgupta, A., Gawande, K. & Kapur, D. (2016). (When) Do anti-poverty programs reduce violence? India’s rural employment guarantee and maoist conflict. International Organization (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Duflo, E. (2012). Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50, 1051–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    England, P., & Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment and gender: A social, economic and demographic view. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eswaran, M., & Malhotra, N. (2011). Domestic violence and women’s autonomy in developing countries: Theory and evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics, 44, 1222–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Food and Agriculture Organization. (2011). The state of food and agriculture. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gasparini, L., Gutierrez, F., Tamola, A., Tornarolli, L., & Porto, G. (2004). Finance and credit variables in household surveys of developing countries. World Bank (Development Economics Research Group), Washington, DC (mimeo).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ghosh, S. (2016). Banker on board and innovative activity. Journal of Business Research, 69, 4205–4214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ghosh, S. (2017). Biometric identification, financial inclusion and economic growth in India: Does mobile penetration matter? Information Technology for Development (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ghosh, S., & Vinod, D. (2017). What constrains financial inclusion for women? Evidence from Indian micro data. World Development, 92, 60–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gibson-Dais, C. M., Magnuson, K., Gennetian, L. A., & Duncan, G. J. (2005). Employment and the risk of domestic abuse among low-income women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 67, 1149–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Government of India (2008). The National Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) operational guidelines. Third edition. Ministry of Rural Development: New Delhi.Government of India (2013). National Sample Survey Organization. Government of India: New Delhi.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Government of India. (2013). Census of India 2011. Government of India: New Delhi.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Government of India. (2014). Crime in India 2013. Government of India: New Delhi.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Government of India. (2015). Crime in India 2014. Government of India: New Delhi.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Government of India. (2015). Economic Survey 2014–15. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Government of India. (2016). Crime in India 2015. Government of India: New Delhi.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Government of Karnataka. (2013). Study on the role of MGNREGS in enhancing financial inclusion. Government of Karnataka: Bangalore.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Halim, N., Yount, K. M., Cunningham, S. A., & Pande, R. (2016). Women’s political empowerment and investments in primary schooling in India. Social Indicators Research, 125, 813–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Imbert, C., & Papp, J. (2015). Labour market effects of social programs: Evidence from India’s employment guarantee act. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7, 233–263.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    InterMedia. (2015). India: Driving digital financial inclusion (Wave 2). InterMedia: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    International Finance Corporation. (2014). Improving access to finance for women-owned businesses in India. Washington, DC: IFC.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    International Labour Office. (2010). Women in labour markets: Measuring progress and identifying challenges. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Iyer, L., Mani, A., Mishra, P., & Topalova, P. (2012). The power of political voice: Women’s political representation and crime in India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4, 165–193.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kendall, J., Mylenko, N. & Ponce, A. (2010). Measuring financial access around the world. Policy Research Working Paper 5253. The World Bank: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Khanna, G., & Zimmerman, L. (2017). Guns and butter: Fighting violence with the promise of development. Journal of Development Economics, 124, 120–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lusardi, A., & Tufano, P. (2015). Debt literacy, financial experiences, and overindebtedness. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 14, 332–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    McCloskey, L. A. (1996). Socioeconomic and coercive power within family. Gender and Society, 10, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mulligan, C. B., & Rubinstein, Y. (2008). Selection, investment, and women’s relative wages over time. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 1061–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    National Crime Records Bureau. (2015). Crime in India 2015. Government of India: New Delhi.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ohlan, R. (2012). Pattern of regional disparities in socio-economic development in India: District-level analysis. Social Indicators Research, 114, 841–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2014). Achieving stronger growth by promoting a more gender-balanced economy. Report prepared jointly by the OECD, ILO, IMF and the World Bank for the G20 Labour and Employment Ministerial Meeting, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Qian, N. (2008). Missing women and the price of tea in China: The effect of sex-specific earnings on sex imbalance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 1251–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1998). Financial dependence and growth. American Economic Review, 88, 559–586.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Reserve Bank of India. (2015). Report of Committee on Medium-term Path on Financial Inclusion (Chairman: Shri. D Mohanty). RBI: Mumbai.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Shah, V. (2012). Managing productivity risk through employment guarantees: Evidence from India. ProQuest.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sharma, M., Giri, A., & Chadha, S. (2016). Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (Wave III Assessment). MicroSave.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sriram, M. S. (2015). Inclusive Finance India Report 2015. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Stotsky, J.G., & Zaman, A. (2016). The influence of gender budgeting in Indian states on gender inequality and fiscal spending. IMF Working Paper No. 227. IMF: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sukthankar, S. (2016). India’s national rural employment scheme: What do we really know about the world’s largest workfare program? India Policy Forum.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    United Nations. (2015). Sustainable Development. Accessed at http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-deveopment-goals.
  61. 61.
  62. 62.
    World Bank. (2012). World Development Report: Gender equality and development. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    World Bank. (2014). The state of social safety nets 2014. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  64. 64.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Advanced Financial Research and Learning, SBS MargFortIndia
  2. 2.Overseas Development InstituteLondonUK

Personalised recommendations