Public Discomfort with Gender Appearance-Inconsistent Bathroom Use: The Oppressive Bind of Bathroom Laws for Transgender Individuals
Previous research with transgender and gender non-conforming samples suggests one’s gender appearance is important in regards to safe access to public bathrooms, as expectations in public bathrooms are an example of gender role social construction and are maintained through gender policing. With the rise of gender related bathroom use legislation, such as North Carolina’s HB-2, it is speculated that transgender individuals face the difficult bind of either using the bathroom consistent with their gender identity to avoid harassment, which means breaking the law, or following the law and breaking societal expectations about gender appearance-congruent bathroom use. Using a 2 × 2 × 2 within-subjects, experimental design the current study investigated public reactions to gender appearance-congruent and gender appearance-incongruent public bathroom use, using a 400 person sample taken from Amazon’s MTurk. The conditions varied by type of bathroom (male or female) in the description, type of image shown (masculine or feminine) and whether the condition contained a gender identity description (no description or transgender description). A total discomfort score served as the dependent variable. Three main hypotheses were tested, (1) there will be a significant 2-way interaction between type of bathroom and type of image, with the condition of a masculine image using a female bathroom (gender appearance-incongruent) having the higher discomfort scores, (2) there will be a significant 3-way interaction, and (3) combined all gender appearance-incongruent conditions will have significantly higher discomfort scores as compared to appearance-congruent conditions. The results of a series of repeated measures ANOVAs supported all three hypotheses, demonstrating the importance of gender appearance in public bathrooms. The social justice implications are discussed along with suggestions for future research.
KeywordsGender Gender policing Gender role conformity Transgender Transgender discrimination Gender diversity Transgender bathroom use
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declares that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Archibald, C. J. (2016). Transgender bathroom rights. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 24, 1–31.Google Scholar
- 7.Cavanagh, S. L. (2010). Queering bathrooms: Gender, sexuality, and the hygienic imagination. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- 9.Clark, C. R. (2011). Rethinking gendered spaces: Bathrooms and safe access for trans people (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from http://csusdspace.calstate.edu/handle/10211.9/1054.
- 13.Grant, J. M., Mottet, L. A., Tanis, J., Harrison, J., Herman, J. L., & Keisling, M. (2011). Injustice at every turn: A report of the national transgender discrimination survey. Washington DC: National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.Google Scholar
- 15.Helgeson, V. S. (2012). Psychology of gender (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- 16.Herman, J. L. (2013). Gendered restrooms and minority stress: The public regulation of gender and its impact on transgender people’s lives. Journal of Public Management and Social Policy, 19(1), 65–80.Google Scholar
- 18.Human Rights Campaign (2016). Anti-transgender legislation spreads nationwide, bills, targeting transgender children surge. Retrieved from: http://hrc/files/assets/resources/HRC-Anti-Trans-Issue-Brief-FINAL-REV2.pdf.Google Scholar
- 19.Lammers, W. J., & Badia, P. (2005). Fundamentals of behavioral research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- 20.Lorber, J. (1991). Sex and gender. In J. Lorber & S. A. Farrell (Eds.), The social construction of gender (pp. 309–321). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- 22.Minter, S., & Daley, C. (2003). Trans realities: A legal needs assessment of San Francisco’s transgender communities. San Francisco: National Center for Lesbian Rights and Transgender Law Center.Google Scholar
- 31.Smith, T. W., Marsden, P. V., & Hout, M. (2015). General Social Surveys, 1972–2014: Cumulative codebook. Chicago: National Data Program for the Social Sciences Series.Google Scholar
- 33.United States Census Bureau. (2012). Current Population Survey. Retrieved from: http://www.census.gov/cps/data/cpstablecreator.html.
- 34.Vade, D. (2002). Gender Neutral Bathroom Survey. Retrieved from: http://archive.srlp.org/files/documents/toolkit/gnb_survey.pdf.