Advertisement

Earth Science Informatics

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 599–613 | Cite as

Ontology-based question understanding with the constraint of Spatio-temporal geological knowledge

  • Wenjia Li
  • Liang WuEmail author
  • Zhong Xie
  • Liufeng Tao
  • Kuanmao Zou
  • Fengdan Li
  • Jinli Miao
Research Article

Abstract

Spatio-temporal geological big data contain a large amount of spatial and nonspatial data. It is important to effectively manage and retrieve these existing data for geological research, and understanding the question represents the first step. This paper aims to better understand the problem to improve the retrieval efficiency. In geology, the organization of massive unstructured geological data and the discovery of implicit content based on knowledge and relationships have been realized. However, previous findings are primarily based on spatial and nonspatial dimensions, and the key words searched are often just segmented words. In geological research, the dimension of time is as important as spatial and other nonspatial dimensions. In addition, an individual user’s goal may be more than a superficial representation of the problem. In this paper, we first construct the geological event ontology, organize Spatio-temporal big data with this dimension, and expand the concept of geological time. Next, based on geology knowledge, we propose spatio-temporal rules, spatial characteristics, and domain constraint rules to assess the consistency of the ontology and to maximize the relationship between the information and improvements in the efficiency of information retrieval. Then, the ontology question is extended, and the rules between this question and other ontologies are expounded to deepen the understanding of the problem. Finally, we evaluate our contribution over a real geology dataset on a knowledge-driven geologic survey information smart-service platform (GSISSP), which integrates geological thematic ontology, geological temporal ontology, and toponymy ontology. This study reveals a positive impact of the incorporation of multiple ontologies and feature rules, which is meaningful for improving accuracy and comprehensiveness.

Keywords

Geology Spatio-temporal big-data Ontology Question understanding 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41871311, 41671400) and the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant No. 2017YFB0503600, 2017YFC0602204, 2018YFB0505500). The authors thank the Development and Research Center of the China Geological Survey for providing technical support. We thank the National Engineering Research Center of Geographic Information System for providing hardware support.

Author contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: Wenjia Li, Liang Wu, Zhong Xie, Liufeng Tao, Kuanmao Zou, Fengdan Li and Jinli Miao; Performed the experiments: Wenjia Li, Liang Wu, Zhong Xie, Liufeng Tao, Kuanmao Zou, Fengdan Li and Jinli Miao; Analyzed the data: Wenjia Li, Liang Wu, Zhong Xie, Liufeng Tao, Kuanmao Zou, Fengdan Li and Jinli Miao; Wrote the paper: Wenjia Li, Liang Wu and Zhong Xie.

References

  1. Abadi A, Ben-Azza H, Sekkat S (2018) Improving integrated product design using SWRL rules expression and ontology-based reasoning. Procedia Computer Science 127:416–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adderly DM, Allen CO, Tucker RK (2018) Intelligence gathering and analysis using a question answering system. US: International Business Machines Corporation (Armonk, NY, US)Google Scholar
  3. Aminu EF, Oyelade ON, Shehu IS (2016) Rule based communication protocol between social networks using semantic web rule language (SWRL). International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science 8:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ben Abacha A, Zweigenbaum P (2015) MEANS: a medical question-answering system combining NLP techniques and semantic web technologies. Inf Process Manag 51:570–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bogdanović M, Stanimirović A, Stoimenov L (2015) Methodology for geospatial data source discovery in ontology-driven geo-information integration architectures. Web Semantics Science Services & Agents on the World Wide Web 32:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandiok A, Chaturvedi DK (2018) Cognitive functionality based question answering system. Int J Comput Appl 179:1–6Google Scholar
  7. Cox SJD (2015) Time ontology extended for non-Gregorian calendar applications. 7:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deng J, Wang Z, Yuan J (2011) Qualitative reasoning with spatial direction relations based on geo-ontology. Computer Programming Skills & Maintenance 20:133–136Google Scholar
  9. Doubravova J, Wiszniowski J, Horalek J (2016) Single layer recurrent neural network for detection of swarm-like earthquakes in W-Bohemia/Vogtland-the method. Comput Geosci 93:138–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frasincar F, Milea V, Kaymak U (2010) tOWL: integrating time in OWL. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  11. Han SY, Tsou M-H, Clarke KC (2017) Revisiting the death of geography in the era of Big Data the friction of distance in cyberspace and real space. International Journal of Digital Earth 1–19Google Scholar
  12. Henriksson A, Kvist M, Dalianis H, Duneld M (2015) Identifying adverse drug event information in clinical notes with distributional semantic representations of context. J Biomed Inform 57:333–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hohenecker P, Lukasiewicz T (2017) Deep learning for ontology reasoningGoogle Scholar
  14. Hong M-D, Oh K-J, Go S-H, Jo G-S (2016) Temporal ontology representation and reasoning using ordinals and sets for historical events. In: Nguyen NT, Trawiński B, Fujita H, Hong T-P (eds) Intelligent information and database systems. Springer-Verlag, pp 75–85Google Scholar
  15. Horrocks I, Patel-Schneider PF, Boley H, Tabet S, Grosof B, Dean M (2004) SWRL introduction. http://www.daml.org/2003/11/swrl/
  16. Hou Z, Zhu Y, Gao X, Luo K, Wang D, Kai S (2015) A Chinese geological time scale ontology for geodata discovery. In: Geoinformatics, 2015 23rd international conference on. IEEE, Wuhan, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  17. Hudelot C, Atif J, Bloch I (2008) A spatial relation ontology using mathematical morphology and description logics for spatial reasoningGoogle Scholar
  18. Idoudi R, Ettabaa KS, Hamrouni K, Solaiman B (2014) An evidence based approach for multipe similarity measures combining for ontology mapping. Image Processing, Applications & Systems ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  19. Jetinai K, Arch-int N, Arch-int S (2016) Ontology mapping and rule-based inference for learning resource integration. Journal of Information and Communication Convergence Engineering 14:97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jia Shu S, Ru Gao C (1989) Preliminary exploration of the element's memory of geological events. J Geom:149–166Google Scholar
  21. Jianping C, Jing L, Ning C, Pingping Y (2015) The construction and application of geological cloud under the big data background. Geological Bulletin of China 34:1260–1265Google Scholar
  22. Kaminski M, Nenov Y, Grau BC (2014) Datalog Rewritability of Disjunctive Datalog Programs and its Applications to Ontology ReasoningGoogle Scholar
  23. Klyuev V, Oleshchuk V (2011) Semantic retrieval: an approach to representing, searching and summarising text documents. Int J Inf Technol Commun Converg 1:221–234Google Scholar
  24. Lakshmi Tulasi R, Rao MS, Ankita K, Hgoudar R (2017) Ontology-based automatic annotation: an approach for efficient retrieval of semantic results of web documents. In: Satapathy SC, Prasad VK, Rani BP, Udgata SK, Raju KS (eds) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Informatics. Springer, Singapore, Singapore, pp 331–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lezcano L, Sicilia MA, Rodríguezsolano C (2011) Integrating reasoning and clinical archetypes using OWL ontologies and SWRL rules. J Biomed Inform 44:343–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu XH, Cui J, Cai F (2018) Geo-ontology modeling and reasoning of Geohazard emergency response knowledge. Geography and Geo-Information ScienceGoogle Scholar
  27. Lu S, Li K, Yu H (2001) Geological events, event sequence and event group. Geological Review 49:521–526Google Scholar
  28. Ma X, Carranza EJM, Wu C, van der Meer FD (2012) Ontology-aided annotation, visualization, and generalization of geological time-scale information from online geological map services. Comput Geosci 40:107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ma X, Erickson JS, Zednik S, West P, Fox P (2016) Semantic specification of data types for a world of open data. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 5:38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mayer-Schnberger, Cukier VK (2013) Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Eamon Dolan/Houghton Mifflin HarcourtGoogle Scholar
  31. Mervin R, Jaya A (2018) A novel approach to mapping for KBQA system using ontology. In: Shetty NR, Patnaik LM, Prasad NH, Nalini N (eds) ERCICA 2016: Emerging Research in Computing, Information, Communication and Applications. Springer, Singapore, Singapore, pp 89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Narayanan S, Harabagiu S (2004) Question answering based on semantic structuresGoogle Scholar
  33. Pavlić M, Han ZD, Jakupović A (2015) Question answering with a conceptual framework for knowledge-based system development "node of knowledge". Expert Syst Appl 42:5264–5286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Perera ARP (2018) A framework for generating informative answers for question answering systems. Auckland University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  35. Recommendation WC (2017) Time ontology in OWL. https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/
  36. Schadd FC, Roos N (2014) Word-sense disambiguation for ontology mapping: concept disambiguation using virtual documents and Information retrieval techniques. Journal on Data Semantics 4:167–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shen D, Lapata M (2007) Using semantic roles to improve question answering// EMNLP-CoNLL 2007, Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, June 28-30, 2007, Prague, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  38. Song Nian L, Guo Jie H, Zhen Qun X (2016) Major Precambrian geological events. Earth Science Frontiers 23:140–155Google Scholar
  39. Varzi AC (2007) Spatial reasoning and ontology: parts, wholes, and locations. Springer NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  40. Wagemann J, Clements O, Figuera RM, Rossi AP, Mantovani S (2017) Geospatial web services pave new ways for server based on demand access and processing of Big Earth Data. International Journal of Digital Earth 11:7–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang W, Stewart K (2015) Spatiotemporal and semantic information extraction from web news reports about natural hazards. Comput Environ Urban Syst 50:30–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang C, Ma X, Chen J (2018) Ontology-driven data integration and visualization for exploring regional geologic time and paleontological information. Comput Geosci 115:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wu L, Xue L, Li C, Lv X, Chen Z, Jiang B, Guo M, Xie Z (2017) A knowledge-driven geospatially enabled framework for geological big data. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 6:166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Xing FK (2015) Domain entities discovery based on Wikipedia. Application Research of ComputersGoogle Scholar
  45. Xu J, Nyerges TL, Nie G (2014) Modeling and representation for earthquake emergency response knowledge: perspective for working with geo-ontology. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 28:185–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yang YH, Du JP, Ping Y (2015) Ontology-based intelligent information retrieval system. Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software 26(7):1675−1687 (in Chinese). http://www.jos.org.cn/1000-9825/4622.htm
  47. Yang C, Yu M, Hu F, Jiang Y, Li Y (2017) Utilizing cloud computing to address big geospatial data challenges. Comput Environ Urban Syst 61:120–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang LY, Tao BR (2015) Ontology mapping based on Bayesian network. Journal of Donghua University 32:681–687Google Scholar
  49. Zheng L, Li X (2008) An ontology reasoning architecture for data mining knowledge management. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences 13:396–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhou G, Zhao J, He T, Wu W (2014) An empirical study of topic-sensitive probabilistic model for expert finding in question answer communities. Knowl-Based Syst 66:136–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenjia Li
    • 1
  • Liang Wu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Zhong Xie
    • 1
    • 2
  • Liufeng Tao
    • 2
  • Kuanmao Zou
    • 1
  • Fengdan Li
    • 3
  • Jinli Miao
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Information EngineeringChina University of GeosciencesWuhanChina
  2. 2.National Engineering Research Center for GISWuhanChina
  3. 3.Development and Research Center, China Geological SurveyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations