Advertisement

Earth Science Informatics

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 525–544 | Cite as

LusTRE: a framework of linked environmental thesauri for metadata management

  • Riccardo Albertoni
  • Monica De Martino
  • Paola Podestà
  • Andreas Abecker
  • Roman Wössner
  • Karsten Schnitter
Research Article

Abstract

The paper illustrates a Linked Thesaurus Framework for the Environment, named LusTRE, to facilitate data sharing across different environmental disciplines. It provides a knowledge infrastructure of multilingual thesauri and code lists, interlinking them so that they can be used as one integrated linked data source. This multilingual thesaurus is published according to the Linked Data Best Practices and supports metadata compilation and data discovery for describing and finding Environmental geodata. A human readable web interface is provided for the exploitation of LusTRE as well as a set of web services for programmatic access to the knowledge infrastructure. LusTRE has been exploited within the European directive INSPIRE and SEIS piloting testbeds implemented within the EU project eENVplus in order to support cross-border and cross-domain data sharing. It is aimed at supporting multilingual data search and query refinement. In order to show how interlinked content can help users to more easily express metadata within Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDI), LusTRE web services have been integrated within existing metadata editors and geoportals.

Keywords

SKOS Thesaurus Linked data Web service Metadata management INSPIRE 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the European Commission through the project eENVplus (grant no. CIP-ICT-PSP 325232, http://www.eenvplus.eu/).

References

  1. Albertoni R, De Martino M, Di Franco S, De Santis V, Plini P (2014a) EARTh: an environmental application reference thesaurus in The Linked Open Data Cloud. In Semantic Web, IOS Press 5(2):165–171Google Scholar
  2. Albertoni R, De Martino M, Podestà P (2014b) Environmental thesauri under the lens of reusability. In: Kő A, Francesconi E (eds) Electronic government and the information systems perspective. EGOVIS 2014. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 8650. Springer, Cham, pp 222–236Google Scholar
  3. Albertoni R, De Martino M, Podestà P (2016a) Linkset Quality Assessment for the thesaurus framework LusTRE. In: Garoufallou E, Subirats Coll I, Stellato A, Greenberg J (eds) Metadata and semantics research. MTSR 2016. Communications in computer and information science, vol 672. Springer, Cham, pp 27–39Google Scholar
  4. Albertoni R, De Martino M, Quarati A (2016b) Integrated quality assessment of linked thesauri for the environment. In: Kő A, Francesconi E (eds) Electronic government and the information systems perspective. EGOVIS 2016. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9831. Springer, Cham, pp 221–235Google Scholar
  5. Albertoni R, Isaac A, Debattista J, Dekkers M, Guret C, Lee D, Mihindukulasooriya N, Zaveri A (2016c) Data on the Web Best practices: Data Quality Vocabulary, W3C Working Group Note. http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dqv/
  6. Attardo C, Saio G (2013) eENVplus: A Framework To Support eEnvironmental Services And Applications. In 27th Int. Conf. on Environmental Informatics for Environmental Protection, Sustainable Development and Risk Management, EnviroInfo-2013, B. Page et al, eds., pp 684–692Google Scholar
  7. Baker T, Bechhofer S, Isaac A, Miles A, Schreiber G, Summers E (2013) Key choices in the design of Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS). J Web Sem 20:35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baker T, Caracciolo C, Doroszenko A, Suominen O (2016) GACS core: creation of a global agricultural concept scheme. In: Garoufallou E, Subirats CI, Stellato A, Greenberg J (eds) Metadata and semantics research. MTSR 2016. Communications in computer and information science, vol 672. Springer, Cham, pp 311–316Google Scholar
  9. Berners-Lee T (2009) Linked Data. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html. Last access: 29 March 2016
  10. Calegari N, Burle C, Bernadette Farias L, Greiner A, Isaac A, Iglesias C, Laufer C, Guéret C, Lee D, Schepers D, Stephan E G, Kauz E, Atemezing G A, Beeman H, Bittencourt I, Almeida J P, Makx Dekkers M,Winstanley P, Archer P, Albertoni R, Purohit S, Córdova Y (2017) Data on the Web Best Practices, W3C Recommendation. https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-dwbp-20170131/, Last access: 1 July 2017
  11. Caracciolo C, Stellato A, Morshed A, Johannsen G, Rajbhandari S, Jaques Y, Keizer J (2013) The AGROVOC Linked Dataset. Semantic Web 4(3):341–348Google Scholar
  12. Carusone A, Olivetta L (2006) Italian Thesaurus of Earth Sciences, APAT. http://www.isprambiente.gov.it/contentfiles/00003600/3687-thist.pdf
  13. Da Silva OC, Lisboa-Filho J, Braga JL et al (2009) Searching for metadata using knowledge bases and topic maps in Spatial Data Infrastructures. Earth Sci Inf 2(4):235–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Martino M, Albertoni R (2011) A multilingual / multicultural semantic-based approach to improve data sharing in an SDI for nature conservation. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 6:206–233Google Scholar
  15. EIONET (2015) GEMET Thesaurus. http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet
  16. GS SOIL (2015) GS SOIL project. https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/SDICS/gs-soil
  17. Heath T, Bizer C (2011) Linked data: evolving the web into a global data space (1st edition). In: Synthesis lectures on the semantic web: theory and technology, 1:1, 1–136. Morgan & Claypool.  https://doi.org/10.2200/S00334ED1V01Y201102WBE001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hyland B, Atemezing G, Villazón-Terrazas B (2016) W3C Working Group Note: Best Practices For Publishing Linked Data, http://www.w3.org/TR/ld-bp/. Last Access: 29 March 2016
  19. INSPIRE (2015a) Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community. http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/
  20. INSPIRE (2015c) INSPIRE registry http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/registry
  21. ISO 19115-1 (2014) Geographic information--Metadata. https://www.iso.org/standard/53798.html
  22. L’Abate G, Caracciolo C, Pesce V, Geser G, Protonotarios V, Costantini E (2015) Exposing vocabularies for soil as Linked Open Data. Inf Process Agric 2(3–4):208–216Google Scholar
  23. Mader C, Haslhofer B, Isaac A (2012) Finding quality issues in SKOS vocabularies. In: Zaphiris P, Buchanan G, Rasmussen E, Loizides F (eds) Theory and practice of digital libraries. TPDL 2012. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 7489. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 222–233Google Scholar
  24. Manaf NAA, Bechhofer S, Stevens R (2012) The current state of SKOS vocabularies on the Web. In: Simperl E, Cimiano P, Polleres A, Corcho O, Presutti V (eds) The semantic Web: research and applications. ESWC 2012. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 7295. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 270–284Google Scholar
  25. Mazzocchi F, Plini P (2005) Development of the Environmental Applications Reference Thesaurus (EARTh). Proceedings of the 7th ISKO-Spain Conference, The human dimension of knowledge organization, Barcelona, Spain, Jul. 6–8Google Scholar
  26. Miles A, Bechhofer S (2009) W3C Recommendation: Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference. http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference. Accessed 20 March 2014
  27. Moué P, Ortmann J (2009) Getting across information communities. Embedding semantics in the SDI for the Amazon. Earth Sci Inf 2:217–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schandl T, Blumauer A (2010) PoolParty: SKOS thesaurus management utilizing linked data. In: Aroyo L, Antoniou G, Hyvönen E, Teije A, Stuckenschmidt H, Cabral L, Tudorache T (eds) The semantic web: research and applications 6089. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 421–425Google Scholar
  29. Schreiber G, Amin A, Aroyo L (2008) Semantic annotation and search of cultural-heritage collections: The MultimediaN E-Culture demonstrator. Web Semant Sci Serv Agents World Wide Web 6(4):243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stellato A, Rajbhandari S, Turbati A, Fiorelli M, Caracciolo C, Lorenzetti T, Keizer J, Pazienza MT (2015) VocBench: A Web application for collaborative development of multilingual thesauri. In: Gandon F, Sabou M, Sack H, d’Amato C, Cudré-Mauroux P, Zimmermann A (eds) The semantic Web. Latest advances and new domains. ESWC 2015. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9088. Springer, Cham, pp 38–53Google Scholar
  31. Stellato A, Turbati A, Fiorelli M, Lorenzetti T, Costetchi E, Laaboudi C, Van Gemert W, Keizer J (2017) Towards VocBench 3: pushing collaborative development of thesauri and ontologies further beyond, Proc. of the 17th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems Workshop (NKOS 2017). CEUR Workshop Proceedings
  32. Wolstencroft K, Owen S, du Preez F, Krebs O, Mueller W, Goble C, Snoep JL (2011) The SEEK: a platform for sharing data and models in systems biology. Methods Enzymol 500:629–655.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385118-5.00029-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wright D, Harrison K, Watkins J (2015) Automated tagging of environmental data using a novel SKOS formatted environmental thesaurus, Earth Sci. Inform 8(1):103–110Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Applied Mathematics and Information TechnologiesNational Research Council (CNR-IMATI)GenoaItaly
  2. 2.Disy Informationssysteme GmbHKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations