Advertisement

Red or blue? Effects of background color in distraction tasks on global processing in unconscious thought

  • Jiansheng Li
  • Luyu Chen
  • Defu Pan
  • Fan Wang
  • Yang YangEmail author
Article
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

Unconscious thought refers to cognitive or affective decision-related processes that take place outside conscious awareness. Studies have found that activation of local processing in Navon small-letter tasks interferes with the global processing of information by unconscious thought, while activation of global processing by Navon large-letter tasks does not. Additionally, the color red activates local processing, while the color blue activates global processing. Therefore, this study examined whether the color red interferes with the global processing of information by unconscious thought and whether the color blue does not. The results of experiment 1 showed that, compared to participants in the red-background unconscious thought condition, participants in the blue-background unconscious thought condition were better able to discriminate between whether mobile phones were considered desirable or undesirable. The results of experiment 2 showed that participants in the red-background unconscious thought condition mainly depended on expectancy-congruent information (such as walking slowly) to evaluate elderly people, while participants in the blue-background unconscious thought condition used both expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information (such as walking quickly) for such evaluation. These results show that the color red activates local processing and interferes with the global processing of information by unconscious thought, while activation of global processing by the color blue does not produce interference.

Keywords

Unconscious thought Decision making Processing style Color Global processing style 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31560281), the Gansu Provincial Social Science Foundation (YB027), and the Gansu Education Science Planning Project (GS[2018]GHBW002).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Authors declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The Study Was Conducted after Obtaining Institutional Review Board Approval from the Department of Psychology at Northwest Normal University. We Received the Written Consent of all Participants before Testing Began. All Procedures Performed in Studies Involving Human Participants Were in Accordance with the Ethical Standards of the Institutional and/or National Research Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its Later Amendments or Comparable Ethical Standards

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Abadie, M., Waroquier, L., & Terrier, P. (2013). Gist memory in the unconscious-thought effect. Psychological Science, 24, 1253–1259.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612470958.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bos, M. W., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2011). Unconscious thought works bottom-up and conscious thought works top-down when forming an impression. Social Cognition, 29, 727–736.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2011.29.6.727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Creswell, J. D., Bursley, J. K., & Satpute, A. B. (2013). Reactivation links unconscious thought to decision making performance. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 863–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 586–598.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.586.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dijksterhuis, A., & Meurs, T. (2006). Where creativity resides: The generative power of unconscious thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 135–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.04.007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 95–109.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00007.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dijksterhuis, A., & Strick, M. (2016). A case for thinking without consciousness. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 117–132.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615615317.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (1995). Memory for expectancy-consistent and expectancy-inconsistent information as a function of processing pace. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 689–694.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250607. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 31, 1005–1007.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121629. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elliot, A. J. (2015). Color and psychological functioning: A review of theoretical and empirical work. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 368.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00368.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Elliot, A. J., Maier, M. A., Binser, M. J., Friedman, R. S., & Pekrun, R. (2009). The effect of red on avoidance behavior in achievement contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 365–375.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208328330.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliot, A. J., Andrew, J., Markus, A., & Maier, M. A. (2014). Color psychology: Effects of perceiving color on psychological functioning in humans. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 95–120.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115035.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans, J. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgement. and social condition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Förster, J. (2012). GLOMOsys: How and why of global and local processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 15–19.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429454. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Francis, G. (2013). Publication bias in “red, rank, and romance in women viewing men” by Elliot et al. (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 142, 292–296.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027923.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hasford, J. (2014). Should I think carefully or sleep on it? Investigating the moderating role of attribute learning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 51–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.004. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jonides, J., Schumacher, E. H., Smith, E. E., Lauber, E. J., Awh, E., Minoshima, S., et al. (1997). Verbal working memory load affects regional brain activation as measured by PET. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 462–475.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1997.9.4.462.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuschel, S., Förster, J., & Denzler, M. (2010). Going beyond information given: How approach versus avoidance cues influence access to higher-order information. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 4–11.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609345023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lassiter, G. D., Lindberg, M. J., González-Vallejo, C., Bellezza, F. S., & Phillips, N. D. (2009). The deliberation-without-attention effect: Evidence for an artifactual interpretation. Psychological Science, 20, 671–675.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02347.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lerouge, D. (2009). Evaluating the benefits of distraction on product evaluations: The mindset effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 367–379.  https://doi.org/10.1086/599047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li, J. S., Gao, Q. Y., Zhou, J. F., Li, X. Y., Zhang, M., & Shen, M. W. (2014a). Bias or equality: Unconscious thought equally integrates temporally scattered information. Consciousness and Cognition, 25, 77–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.01.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Li, J. S., Zhu, Y. W., & Yang, Y. (2014b). The merits of unconscious thought in rule detection. PLoS One, 9, e106557.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106557.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Li, J. S., Wang, F., Shen, M. W., & Fan, G. (2017). The tendency of unconscious thought toward global processing style. Consciousness and Cognition, 53, 14–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.05.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Maier, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Lichtenfeld, S. (2008). Mediation of the negative effect of red on intellectual performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1530–1540.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208323104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. McMahon, K., Sparrow, B., Chatman, L., & Riddle, T. (2011). Driven to distraction: Impacts of distractor type and heuristic use in unconscious and conscious decision making. Social Cognition, 29, 683–698.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2011.29.6.683. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mealor, A. D., & Dienes, Z. (2012). Conscious and unconscious thought in artificial grammar learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 865–874.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.03.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mehta, R., & Zhu, R. (2009). Blue or red? Exploring the effect of color on cognitive task performances. Science, 323, 1226–1229.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1169144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nieuwenstein, M. R., Wierenga, T., Morey, R. D., Wicherts, J. M., Blom, T. N., Wagenmakers, E. J., et al. (2015). On making the right choice: A meta-analysis and large-scale replication attempt of the unconscious thought advantage. Judgment & Decision Making, 10, 1–17.Google Scholar
  30. Smeesters, D., & Liu, J. E. (2011). The effect of color (red versus blue) on assimilation versus contrast in prime-to-behavior effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 653–656.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.02.010. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Strick, M., Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Sjoerdma, A., van Baaren, R. B., & Nordgren, L. F. (2011). A meta-analysis on unconscious thought effects. Social Cognition, 29, 738–762.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2011.29.6.738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1107.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang, H., Chattopadhyay, A., Zhang, K., & Dahl, D. W. (2012). Unconscious creativity: When can unconscious thought outperform conscious thought? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 573–581.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorthwest Normal UniversityLanzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Medicine Training CenterAir Force Dalian AeronauticalDalianPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations