The validity and reliability of the Zimbardo time perspective inventory in a Turkish sample
- 11 Downloads
The present study evaluated the validity and reliability of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI; Zimbardo & Boyd, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288, 1999) in a Turkish sample. A Turkish version of the ZTPI was administered to participants in Study 1 (n = 554) while another group of participants filled out the ZTPI as well as measures of personality, locus of control, self-esteem, and self-efficacy in Study 2 (n = 234). Test-retest reliability of the ZTPI scores was assessed on the Study 2’s sample (n = 88) over a 2-week period. The Turkish ZTPI demonstrated adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability with minor exceptions. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) supported the five-factor structure of the original scale suggesting that the ZTPI has cross-cultural validity. However, similar to prior adaptation studies, the model fit values ranged from poor to good, suggesting a need for additional research on the psychometric properties of the ZTPI. Finally, the applicability of the deviation from balanced perspective scores was examined and unique relationships were demonstrated: balanced time perspective was associated with high conscientiousness and internal locus of control. Findings are discussed in relation to the time perspective theory, and the recommendations to improve the ZTPI’s structural validity are provided.
KeywordsTime perspective theory Balanced time perspective Personality Self-efficacy Self-esteem Locus of control Confirmatory factor analysis
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Anagnostopoulos, F., & Griva, F. (2012). Exploring time perspective in Greek young adults: Validation of the Zimbardo time perspective inventory and relationships with mental health indicators. Social Indicators Research, 106(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9792-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boniwell, I. (2005). Beyond time management: How the latest research on time perspective and perceived time use can assist clients with time-related concerns. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 3(2), 61–74.Google Scholar
- Boniwell, I., & Osin, E. (2014). Beyond time management: Time use, performance and well-being. Organizational Psychology, 5(3), 85–104.Google Scholar
- Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing one’s time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 165–180). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Boniwell, I., Osin, E., & Sircova, A. (2014). Introducing time perspective coaching: A new approach to improve time management and enhance well-being. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 12(2), 24–40.Google Scholar
- Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1989). The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI manual supplement. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Cuhadaroglu, F. (1986). Adolesanlarda benlik saygisi. Yayimlanmamis Uzmanlik Tezi. Hacettepe Universitesi, Tip Fakultesi, Psikiyatri Anabilim Dali, Ankara.Google Scholar
- Dağ, İ. (1991). Rotter’in İç-Dış Kontrol Odağı Ölçeği (RİDKOÖ)‘nin üniversite öğrencileri için güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Psikoloji Dergisi, 7(26), 10–16.Google Scholar
- Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Goodman, P. S. (2018). Turkey’s economy is so hot that it may face a meltdown. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/10/business/turkey-economy-erdogan.html. Accessed 5 Dec 2018.
- Göregenli, M. (1995). Toplumumuzda bireycilik-toplulukçuluk eğilimleri. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi (Turkish Journal of Psychology), 11, 1–13.Google Scholar
- Kairys, A. (2010). Correlations between time perspectives and personality traits in different age groups. Bridges / Tiltai, 51(2), 159–172.Google Scholar
- Kairys, A., & Liniauskaite, A. (2015). Time perspective and personality. In M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine, & W. van Beek (Eds.), Time perspective theory; Review, research and application: Essays in honor of Philip G. Zimbardo (pp. 99–113). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kislali-Erginbilgic, A. (n.d.). The reliability and validity of Zimbardo time perspective inventory scores in Turkish university students. Unpublished data.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Law, K. S., & Wong, C. S. (1999). Multidimensional constructs in structural equation analysis: An illustration using the job perception and job satisfaction constructs. Journal of Management, 25, 143–160.Google Scholar
- Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in the social sciences: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
- McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., & members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer's perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1687.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Milfont, T. L., Andrade, P. R., Belo, R. P., & Pessoa, V. S. (2008). Testing zimbardo time perspective inventory in a Brazilian sample. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 42(1), 49–58.Google Scholar
- Moritz, S., & Bartz-Beielstein, T. (2017). imputeTS: time series missing value imputation in R. The R Journal, 9(1), 207–218. https://journal.r-project.org/archive/2017/RJ-2017-009/index.html. Accessed 10 Sept 2018.
- Ortuño, V., & Gamboa, V. (2009). Estrutura factorial do Zimbardo time perspective inventory—ZTPI numa amostra de estudantes universitários portugueses [factorial structure of Zimbardo time perspective inventory—ZTPI in a sample of Portuguese university students]. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 27, 21–32.Google Scholar
- Perry, J. L., McKay, M. T., Worrell, F. C., Živkovič, U., Mello, Z. R., & Musil, B. (2015). Measuring time perspective in adolescents: Can you get the right answer by asking the wrong questions? Personality and Individual Differences, 78, 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team (2017) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 10 Sept 2018.
- Revelle, W. (2018). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research (Version 1.8.12) [Computer software]. Retrieved fromhttps://cran.r-project.org/package=psych. Accessed 20 Jan 2019.
- Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36 URL http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/. Accessed 9 June 2018.
- Seema, R., & Sircova, A. (2013). Mindfulness – A time perspective? Estonian study. Baltic Journal of Psychology, 14(2), 4–21.Google Scholar
- Sircova, A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Osin, E., Milfont, T. L., Fieulaine, N., Kislali-Erginbilgic, A., et al. (2014). A global look at time: A 24-country study of the equivalence of the Zimbardo time perspective inventory. SAGE Open, 4, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013515686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sircova, A., Van De Vijer, F. J. R., Osin, E., et al. (2015). Time perspective profiles of cultures. In M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine, & W. van Beek (Eds.), Time perspective theory: Review, research, and application. Essays in honor of Phillip G. Zimbardo (pp. 169–187). Zug: Springer.Google Scholar
- Stolarski, M., & Cyniak-Cieciura, M. (2016). Balanced and less traumatized: Balanced time perspective mediates the relationship between temperament and severity of ptsd syndrome in motor vehicle accident survivor sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 456–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stolarski, M., Wiberg, W., & Osin, E. (2015). Assessing temporal harmony: The issue of a balanced time perspective. In M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine, & W. van Beek (Eds.), Time perspective theory; Review, research and application: Essays in honor of Philip G. Zimbardo (pp. 55–71). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sunar, D. (1996). Turkish adaptation of the NEO-FFI. Unpublished manuscript, Bogazici University, Istanbul.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Wiberg, M., Sircova, A., Wiberg, B., & Carelli, M. G. (2012). Operationalizing balanced time perspective in a Swedish sample. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 95–107.Google Scholar
- Yildirim, F., & İlhan, İ. Ö. (2010). The validity and reliability of the general self-efficacy scale-Turkish form. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 21(4), 1–7.Google Scholar
- Zajenkowski, M., Stolarski, M., Witowska, J., Maciantowicz, O., & Lowicki, P. (2016b). Fluid intelligence as a mediator of the relationship between executive control and balanced time perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1844. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01844.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., & Stolarski, M. (2013). Comparing three methods to measure a balanced time perspective: The relationship between a balanced time perspective and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9322-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. (2008). The time paradox: the new psychology of time that will change your life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar