Advertisement

Indicators for professional growth for health care specialists: Face-to-face supervision

  • Vasilia Kountoura
  • Ioannis Agaliotis
  • Ariadne Loutrari
  • Hariklia Proios
Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

We explored patterns of supervisor-supervisee interactions in face-to-face supervisory conference, drawing upon theoretical constructs from Rogerian-Penman psychology. Theoretical constructs targeted in the analysis include: tallying responses according to specific subcategories i.e., seeking solutions, descriptions, identification, and resolutions. Structure and source of information include manifest/latent and power/involvement, as well as stages of professional development for the supervisee. “Before and after” supervisory conference goals are established for two students in special education. Face-to-face conversations, subsequent transcriptions, and written conversational analysis of video conferences of supervisors and supervisees are presented. The results of our study indicate hallmarks of a more sensitive analysis for the evaluation of face-to-face supervision, i.e., the source of information discussed in relation to the first supervision conference corresponded to 63% opinion. Results indicate that the practitioner progressed from the stage of “Stagnation” to that of “Confusion.” Additionally, the supervisor needed to be more “Catalytic” as evidenced by the use of 16% Resolutions and 30% Seeking Solutions. We elaborate on the analysis and the indicators for professional development that were identified. Such analysis offers a practical approach based on established theoretical frameworks in an effort to provide insights into professional growth and the supervisory relationship.

Keywords

Indicators Development Rogerian- Penman psychology Supervisory relationship 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors had no financial or other conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Anderson, J. L. (1988). The Supervisory Process in Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology. In The supervisory process in speech language pathology and audiology. Austin: Pro-Ed.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angyal, A. (1941). Foundations for a Science of Personality. Harvard University Press: Cambridge Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  3. Baecher, L., & McCormack, B. (2015). The impact of video review on supervisory conferencing. Language and Education, 29(2), 153–173 http://www.tesl ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume18/ej71/ej71a5/ Accessed 20 April 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baecher, L., McCormack, M., & Kung, S. C. (2014). Supervisor use of video as a tool in teacher reflection. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 18(3), 1–17.Google Scholar
  5. Beder, J. (2000). The integration of theory into practice: Suggestions for supervisors. Professional Development: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 3, 40–42 http://www.profdevjournal.org/articles/32040.pdf . Accessed 15 April 2016.Google Scholar
  6. Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (1998). Fundamentals of clinical supervision. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  7. Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2009). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (4th ed.). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  8. Caracciolo, G. L., Rigrodsky, S., & Morrison, E. B. (1978a). A Rogerian orientation to the speech-language pathology supervisory relationship. ASHA, 20, 286–290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Caracciolo, G. L., Rigrodsky, S., & Morrison, E. B. (1978b). Perceived interpersonal conditions and professional growth of master’s level SLP students during the supervisory process. ASHA, 20, 467–477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Caracciolo, G. L., Rigrodsky, S., & Morrison, E. B. (1980). Supervisory relationships and the growth in clinical effectiveness and professional self-esteem of undergraduate student clinicians during a school-based practicum. LSHSS, 11, 118–126.Google Scholar
  11. Corey, G., Haynes, R., Moulton, P., & Muratori, M. (2010). Clinical supervision in the helping professions: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  12. Gardner, R. S., & Wampold, B. E. (1991). Relationship of power and involvement to working alliance: A multiple-case sequential analysis of brief therapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(2), 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grant, J., Schofield, M., & Crawford, S. (2012). Managing difficulties in supervision: Supervisors’ perspectives. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(4), 528–541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haggerty, G., & Hilsenrot, M. (2011). The use of video in psychotherapy supervision. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 27(2), 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huhra, R. L., Yamokoski-Maynhart, C. A., & Prieto, L. R. (2008). Reviewing videotape in supervision: A developmental approach. Journal of Counseling and Development, 86(4), 412–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
  17. Loganbill, C., Hardy, E., & Delworth, U. (1982). Supervision: A conceptual model. The Counseling Psychologist, 10(1), 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacCluskie, K. C. (2010). Acquiring counseling skills: Integrating theory, multiculturalism, and self-awareness. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Merrill.Google Scholar
  19. Nelson, M. L., Barnes, K. L., Evans, A. L., & Triggiano, P. J. (2008). Working with conflict in clinical supervision: Wise supervisors’ perspectives. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(2), 172–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Penman, R. (1980). Communication processes and relationships. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pickering, M. (1988). Expectation and intent in the supervisory process. The Clinical Supervisor, 5, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pretorius, W. M. (2006). Cognitive Behavioural therapy supervision: Recommended practice. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 34, 413–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rogers, C. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications and theory. London: Constable.Google Scholar
  24. Rogers, C. R. (1962). The interpersonal relationship: The core of guidance. Harvard Educational Review, 32(4), 416–429.Google Scholar
  25. Shulman, L. (2010). Interactional supervision (3rd ed.). Washington: NASW Press.Google Scholar
  26. Tripp, T., & Rich, P. J. (2012). The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 728–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Watkins, C. E. (2013). The beginnings of psychoanalytic supervision: The crucial role of max Eitingon. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 73, 254–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wood, C. (2005). Supervisory working Alliance: A model providing direction for college counseling supervision. Journal of College Counseling, 8(2), 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ylonen, A., & Norwich, B. (2015). How lesson study helps teachers of pupils with specific needs or difficulties. In P. Dudley (Ed.), Lesson study: Professional learning for our time (pp. 70–86). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vasilia Kountoura
    • 1
  • Ioannis Agaliotis
    • 1
  • Ariadne Loutrari
    • 2
  • Hariklia Proios
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational and Social PolicyUniversity of MacedoniaThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.School of Languages and Social SciencesAston UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations