Are neo-liberals more intuitive? Undetected libertarians confound the relation between analytic cognitive style and economic conservatism
Previous studies consistently showed that analytic cognitive style (ACS) is negatively correlated with social conservatism, but there are mixed findings concerning its relation with economic conservatism. Most tests have relied on a unidimensional (liberal-conservative) operationalization of political orientation. Libertarians tend not only to identify themselves as conservative on this scale but also to score higher on ACS than liberals and conservatives. The presence of libertarians might be the reason for the above-mentioned mixed findings. We investigated the relation between social and economic conservatism and ACS (operationalized using the Cognitive Reflection Test; CRT) in a large, web-based sample. There was a negative correlation between CRT and social conservatism both when libertarians were included and excluded. However, the correlation between CRT and economic conservatism was significantly reduced in magnitude and became non-significant when libertarians were excluded. The results support the argument that the undetected presence of libertarians may confound the ACS-economic conservatism relation.
KeywordsAnalytic cognitive style Libertarians Liberals Conservatives Cognitive reflection test
We thank Gordon Pennycook and Thomas Talhelm for their helpful comments.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bahçekapili, H. G., & Yilmaz, O. (2017). The relation between different types of religiosity and analytic cognitive style. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 267–272.Google Scholar
- Baron, J. (2015). Supplement to Deppe et al. (2015). Judgment and Decision making, 10(4), 1–2.Google Scholar
- Baron, J., Scott, S., Fincher, K., & Metz, S. E. (2015). Why does the cognitive reflection test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(3), 265–284.Google Scholar
- Białek, M., & De Neys, W. (2016). Conflict detection during moral decision-making: Evidence for deontic reasoners’ utilitarian sensitivity. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 631–639.Google Scholar
- Boaz, D., & Kirby, D. (2006). The libertarian vote. Cato Institute Policy Analysis, 580, 1–26.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Deppe, K. D., Gonzalez, F. J., Neiman, J. L., Jacobs, C., Pahlke, J., Smith, K. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (2015). Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the cognitive reflection test and ideology. Judgment and Decision making, 10(4), 314–331.Google Scholar
- Feldman, S., & Johnston, C. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35(3), 337–358.Google Scholar
- Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42.Google Scholar
- Jost, J. T., Sterling, J., & Stern, C. (2017). Getting closure on conservatism, or the politics of epistemic and existential motivation. In C. Kopetz, & A. Fishbach (Eds.), The motivation-cognition interface; From the lab to the real world: A Festschrift in honor of Arie W. Kruglanski.Google Scholar
- Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision making, 8(4), 407–424.Google Scholar
- Klein, C. (2011). The dual track theory of moral decision-making: A critique of the neuroimaging evidence. Neuroethics, 4(2), 143–162.Google Scholar
- Landy, J. F. (2016). Representations of moral violations: Category members and associated features. Judgment and Decision making, 11(5), 496–508.Google Scholar
- Meyer, A., Zhou, E., & Shane, F. (2018). The non-effects of repeated exposure to the Cognitive Reflection Test. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(3), 246–259.Google Scholar
- Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Cognitive reflection and the 2018 U.S. Presidential Election. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Google Scholar
- Piazza, J., & Sousa, P. (2014). Religiosity, political orientation, and consequentialist moral thinking. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 334–342.Google Scholar
- Saribay, S. A., & Yilmaz, O. (2017). Analytic cognitive style and cognitive ability differentially predict religiosity and social conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 114, 24–29.Google Scholar
- Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in god. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(3), 423–428.Google Scholar
- Skitka, L. J. (2010). The psychology of moral conviction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 267–281.Google Scholar
- Sterling, J., Jost, J. T., & Pennycook, G. (2016). Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit? Judgment and Decision making, 11(4), 352–360.Google Scholar
- Thompson, V. A. (2009). Dual-process theories: A metacognitive perspective. In J. St, B. T. Evans, & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 171–196). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Thomson, K. S., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2016). Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test. Judgment and Decision making, 11(1), 99–113.Google Scholar
- Yilmaz, O., Karadöller, D. Z., & Sofuoglu, G. (2016). Analytic thinking, religion, and prejudice: an experimental test of the dual-process model of mind. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 26(4), 360–369.Google Scholar
- Yilmaz, O., & Saribay, S. A. (2016). An attempt to clarify the link between cognitive style and political ideology: a non-western replication and extension. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(3), 287–300.Google Scholar
- Yilmaz, O., & Saribay, S. A. (2017a). Analytic thought training promotes liberalism on contextualized (but not stable) political opinions. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616687092.
- Yilmaz, O., & Saribay, S. A. (2017b). The relationship between cognitive style and political orientation depends on the measures used. Judgment and Decision Making, 12(2), 140–147.Google Scholar
- Yilmaz, O., & Saribay, S. A. (2018). Lower levels of resistance to change (but not opposition to equality) is related to analytic cognitive style. Social Psychology, 49, 65–75.Google Scholar
- Yonker, J. E., Edman, L. R., Cresswell, J., & Barrett, J. L. (2016). Primed analytic thought and religiosity: The importance of individual characteristics. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 8(4), 298–308.Google Scholar