Advertisement

Dark personality features and workplace outcomes: The mediating role of difficulties in personality functioning

  • Virgil Zeigler-HillEmail author
  • Avi BesserEmail author
Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Darker aspect of personality (e.g., narcissism, psychopathy) have been shown to be associated with a wide range of workplace outcomes. However, relatively little is known about the psychological mechanisms that may explain these associations. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether the associations that dark personality features had with workplace outcomes were explained, at least in part, by difficulties in self-functioning (i.e., identity, self-direction) and interpersonal functioning (i.e., empathy, intimacy) in an Israeli community sample. Our results revealed that difficulties in self-functioning often mediated the associations that dark personality features had with workplace outcomes. More specifically, difficulties with self-direction mediated the associations that psychopathy, sadism, and spitefulness had with task performance and contextual performance, whereas difficulties with identity mediated the associations that Machiavellianism, psychopathy, sadism, and spitefulness had with counter-productive work behaviors. Although Machiavellianism, psychopathy, sadism, and spitefulness were strongly associated with difficulties with empathy and intimacy, these difficulties with interpersonal functioning were not associated with workplace outcomes. Discussion focuses on the role that difficulties in self-functioning and identity may play in the connections between dark personality features and workplace outcomes.

Keywords

Dark triad Narcissism Psychopathy Machiavellianism Personality functioning Workplace outcomes 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All materials and procedures for this research were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Sapir Academic College.

Conflict of Interests

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Ali, F., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2010). The dark side of love and life satisfaction: Associations with intimate relationships, psychopathy and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 228–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Back, M. D., Küfner, A. P., Dufner, M., Gerlach, T. M., Rauthmann, J. F., & Denissen, J. A. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 1013–1037.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034431.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baloch, M. A., Meng, F., Xu, Z., Cepeda-Carrion, I., & Bari, M. W. (2017). Dark triad, perceptions of organizational politics and counterproductive work behaviors: The moderating effect of political skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1972.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01972.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Barlett, C. P., & Barlett, N. D. (2015). The young and the restless: Examining the relationships between age, emerging adulthood variables, and the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 20–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bechtoldt, M. N., Welk, C., Zapf, D., & Hartig, J. (2007). Main and moderating effects of self-control, organizational justice, and emotional labour on counterproductive behaviour at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16, 479–500.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320701662618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blair, C. A., Hoffman, B. J., & Helland, K. R. (2008). Narcissism in organizations: A multisource appraisal reflects different perspectives. Human Performance, 21, 254–276.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08959280802137705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Buckels, E. E., Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). Behavioral confirmation of everyday sadism. Psychological Science, 24, 2201–2209.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613490749.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 687–732). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, W. K., Hoffman, B. J., Campbell, S. M., & Marchisio, G. (2011). Narcissism in organizational contexts. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 268–284.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chabrol, H., Van Leeuwen, N., Rodgers, R., & Séjourné, N. (2009). Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 734–739.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, A. (2016). Are they among us? A conceptual framework of the relationship between the dark triad personality and counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs). Human Resource Management Review, 26, 69–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, A., & Abedallah, M. (2015). The mediating role of burnout on the relationship of emotional intelligence and self-efficacy with OCB and performance. Management Research Review, 38, 2–28.  https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-10-2013-0238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen, A., & Diamant, A. (2017). The role of justice perceptions in determining counterproductive work behaviors. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-24.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1340321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. (2014). Organization development and change (10th ed.). Stamford: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  18. Dahling, J. J., Whitaker, B. G., & Levy, P. E. (2009). The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management, 35, 219–257.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ewing, D., Zeigler-Hill, V., & Vonk, J. (2016). Spitefulness and deficits in the social-perceptual and social-cognitive components of theory of mind. Personality and Individual Differences, 91, 7–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 199–216.  https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grant, A. M., & Schwartz, B. (2011). Too much of a good thing: The challenge and opportunity of the inverted U. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 61–76.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393523.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Grijalva, E., & Newman, D. A. (2015). Narcissism and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): Meta-analysis and consideration of collectivist culture, big five personality, and narcissism’s facet structure. Applied Psychology, 64, 93–126.  https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hampson, S. E. (2012). Personality processes: Mechanisms by which personality traits “get outside the skin”. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 315–339.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100419.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Harms, P. D., Spain, S. M., & Hannah, S. T. (2011). Leader development and the dark side of personality. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 495–509.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hayes, A. F., Montoya, A. K., & Rockwood, N. J. (2017). The analysis of mechanisms and their contingencies: PROCESS versus structural equation modeling. Australasian Marketing Journal, 25, 76–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2017.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. D., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The dark triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23, 5–18.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jonason, P. K., Slomski, S., & Partyka, J. (2012). The dark triad at work: How toxic employees get their way. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 449–453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jonason, P. K., & Tost, J. (2010). I just cannot control myself: The dark triad and self-control. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 611–615.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jonason, P. K., Wee, S., & Li, N. P. (2015). Competition, autonomy, and prestige: Mechanisms through which the dark triad predict job satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 112–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones, D. N., & Figueredo, A. J. (2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the dark triad. European Journal of Personality, 27, 521–531.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2011). Differentiating the dark triad within the interpersonal circumplex. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 249–268). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28–41.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones, G. E., & Kavanagh, M. J. (1996). An experimental examination of the effects of individual and situational factors on unethical behavioral intentions in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 511–523.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4126-3_33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Judge, T. A., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2006). Loving yourself abundantly: Relationship of the narcissistic personality to self-and other perceptions of workplace deviance, leadership, and task and contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 762–776.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.762.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kellett, J. B., Humphrey, R. H., & Sleeth, R. G. (2002). Empathy and complex task performance: Two routes to leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 523–544.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00142-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kessler, S. R., Bandelli, A. C., Spector, P. E., Borman, W. C., Nelson, C. E., & Penney, L. M. (2010). Re-examining Machiavelli: A three-dimensional model of Machiavellianism in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1868–1896.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00643.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koopmans, L., Bemaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., van Buuren, S., van der Beek, A. J., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2014). Improving the individual work performance questionnaire using Rasch analysis. Journal of Applied Measurement, 15, 160–175.  https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2013-101717.51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kopelman, R. E., & Mullins, L. S. (1992). Is narcissism inversely related to satisfaction? An examination of data from two US samples. Journal of Psychology, 126, 121–130.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1992.10543346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lynam, D. R., Hoyle, R. H., & Newman, J. P. (2006). The perils of partialling: Cautionary tales from aggression and psychopathy. Assessment, 13, 328–341.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106290562.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Marcus, D. K., & Norris, A. L. (2016). Spite. In V. Zeigler-Hill & D. K. Marcus (Eds.), The dark side of personality: Science and practice in social, personality, and clinical psychology (pp. 121–133). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marcus, D. K., Preszler, J., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2018). A network of dark personality traits: What lies at the heart of darkness? Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 56–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marcus, D. K., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2015). A big tent of dark personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 434–446.  https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marcus, D. K., Zeigler-Hill, V., Mercer, S., & Norris, A. L. (2014). The psychology of spite and the measurement of spitefulness. Psychological Assessment, 26, 563–574.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036039.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12, 23–44.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.12.1.23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Merkin, R. S. (2006). Uncertainty avoidance and facework: A test of the Hofstede model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 213–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Keith Campbell, W. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79, 1013–1042.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00711.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Morey, L. C. (2017). Development and initial evaluation of a self-report form of the DSM-5 level of personality functioning scale. Psychological Assessment, 29, 1302–1308.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000450.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125, 656–688.  https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Nagler, U. K., Reiter, K. J., Furtner, M. R., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2014). Is there a “dark intelligence”? Emotional intelligence is used by dark personalities to emotionally manipulate others. Personality and Individual Differences, 65, 47–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2016). Human resource management (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  53. O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 557–579.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025679.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., Story, P. A., & White, C. D. (2015). A meta-analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the dark triad and five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 83, 644–664.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Palmer, J. C., Komarraju, M., Carter, M. Z., & Karau, S. J. (2017). Angel on one shoulder: Can perceived organizational support moderate the relationship between the dark triad traits and counterproductive work behavior? Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 31–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Paulhus, D. L., & Dutton, D. G. (2016). Everyday sadism. In V. Zeigler-Hill & D. K. Marcus (Eds.), The dark side of personality: Science and practice in social, personality, and clinical psychology (pp. 109–120). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Plouffe, R. A., Saklofske, D. H., & Smith, M. M. (2017). The assessment of sadistic personality: Preliminary psychometric evidence for a new measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 166–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Powell, M., & Gifford, J. (2017). Machiavellian intelligence: How to survive and rise in the modern corporation. New York: LID Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331–363.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66–80.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.1.66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Rouhana, N. N., & Bar-Tal, D. (1998). Psychological dynamics of intractable enthnonational conflicts: The Israeli-Palestinian case. American Psychologist, 53, 761–770.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.7.761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sagy, S., Orr, E., Bar-On, D., & Awwad, E. (2001). Individualism and collectivism in two conflicted societies: Comparing Israeli-Jewish and Palestinian-Arab high school students. Youth and Society, 33, 3–30.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X01033001001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609–612.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 219–227.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2406773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.  https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.7.4.422.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1123–1128.  https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w9e3r.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Sleep, C. E., Lynam, D. R., Hyatt, C. S., & Miller, J. D. (2017). Perils of partialing redux: The case of the dark triad. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 939–950.  https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Smith, M. B., Hill, A. D., Wallace, J. C., Recendes, T., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Upsides to dark and downsides to bright personality: A multidomain review and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 44, 191–217.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317733511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Soyer, R. B., Rovenpor, J. L., & Kopelman, R. E. (1999). Narcissism and achievement motivation as related to three facets of the sales role: Attraction, satisfaction and performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14, 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Spain, S. M., & Harms, P. D. (2018). Dark personality features of employment. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences, Applications of personality and individual differences (Vol. 3, pp. 518–536). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  72. Spain, S. M., Harms, P. D., & LeBreton, J. M. (2014). The dark side of personality at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 41–60.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tengblad, S. (2012). Overcoming the rationalistic fallacy in management research. In S. Tengblad (Ed.), The work of managers: Towards a practice theory of management (pp. 3–17). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500–517.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Unger-Aviram, E., Zeigler-Hill, V., Barina, M., & Besser, A. (2018). Narcissism, collective efficacy, and satisfaction in self-managed teams: The moderating role of team goal orientation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 22, 172–186.  https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vonk, J., Zeigler-Hill, V., Ewing, D., Mercer, S., & Noser, A. E. (2015). Mindreading in the dark: Dark personality features and theory of mind. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 50–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wai, M., & Tiliopoulos, N. (2012). The affective and cognitive empathic nature of the dark triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 794–799.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wright, Z. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2018). Pathological personality traits: The movement toward dimensional approaches to psychopathology. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences, The science of personality and individual differences (Vol. 1, pp. 409–438). London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zeigler-Hill, V., & Marcus, D. K. (2016). The dark side of personality: Science and practice in social, personality, and clinical psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zeigler-Hill, V., & Marcus, D. K. (2019). The dark side of personality: Building on Paulhus and Williams (2002). In P. J. Corr (Ed.), Personality and individual differences: Revisiting the classic studies (pp. 245–262). London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zeigler-Hill, V., McCabe, G. A., Vrabel, J. K., Raby, C. M., & Cronin, S. (2018). The narcissistic pursuit of status. In A. D. Hermann, A. B. Brunell, & J. D. Foster (Eds.), The handbook of trait narcissism: Key advances, research methods, and controversies (pp. 299–306). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zeigler-Hill, V., Southard, A. C., & Besser, A. (2014). Resource control strategies and personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 118–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zettler, I., & Solga, M. (2013). Not enough of a ‘dark’ trait? Linking Machiavellianism to job performance. European Journal of Personality, 27, 545–554.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zeigler-Hill, V., Vrabel, J. K., McCabe, G. A., Cosby, C. A., Traeder, C. K., Hobbs, K. A., & Southard, A. C. (2019). Narcissism and the pursuit of status. Journal of Personality, 87, 310–327.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12392.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyOakland UniversityRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Interdisciplinary School for Sciences, Health and Society, Department of Communication DisordersHadassah Academic CollegeJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations