Advertisement

Self-compassion mindsets: The components of the self-compassion scale operate as a balanced system within individuals

  • Wendy J. PhillipsEmail author
Article

Abstract

Self-compassion is theorised to represent a synergistic system of interplay between self-kindness, self-judgement, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and overidentification. This study evaluated this proposition by identifying how the six components tend to interact within individuals to form self-compassion mindsets. Australian adults (N = 353; Mage = 41.54; 50.1% male) completed a web-based survey that included the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS). Latent Profile Analysis of the six SCS subscale variables identified three self-compassion mindsets in the sample that reflected incremental increases in total self-compassion: Uncompassionate Self-Responding, Moderately Self-Compassionate, and Highly Self-Compassionate. A second LPA in a student sample validated the three-mindset solution. The highly self-compassionate mindset was over-represented by male, older, retired, and highly educated individuals and the uncompassionate self-responding profile was over-represented by females and students. Partial correlations revealed that the predictive strength of each self-compassion component on psychological well-being and emotion regulation differed across mindsets. Results indicate that the positive and negative self-compassion components operate in unison, and that vulnerable individuals may benefit most from training programs that focus on increasing self-kindness to improve psychological well-being or on decreasing overidentification to improve emotion regulation.

Keywords

Self-compassion Latent profile analysis Psychological well-being Emotion regulation Self-compassion scale 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of New England's human research ethics committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The main SPSS dataset generated and analysed during the current study may be downloaded from https://cloudstor.aarnet.edu.au/plus/s/DRIYlxa1rY5GD9c.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

12144_2019_452_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (109 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 109 kb)

References

  1. Albertson, E. R., Neff, K. D., & Dill-Shackleford, K. E. (2015). Self-compassion and body dissatisfaction in women: A randomized controlled trial of a brief meditation intervention. Mindfulness, 6(3), 444–454.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-014-0277-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, A. B., & Leary, M. R. (2014). Self-compassionate responses to aging. The Gerontologist, 54(2), 190–200.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gns204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, A. B., Goldwasser, E. R., & Leary, M. R. (2012). Self-compassion and well-being among older adults. Self and Identity, 11(4), 428–453.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2011.595082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartone, P. T. (2007). Test-retest reliability of the dispositional resilience Scale-15, a brief hardiness scale. Psychological Reports, 101(3), 943–944.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.101.3.943-944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boas, T. C., Christenson, D. P., & Glick, D. M. (2018). Recruiting large online samples in the United States and India: Facebook, Mechanical Turk, and Qualtrics. Political Science Research and Methods, 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.28.
  6. Castilho, P., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Duarte, J. (2015). Evaluating the multifactor structure of the long and short versions of the self-compassion scale in a clinical sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71(9), 856–870.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
  10. Diener, E., & Suh, M. E. (1998). Subjective well-being and age: An international analysis. In Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics, Vol. 17: Focus on emotion and adult development. (pp. 304-324, Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics.). New York: Springer Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  11. Ferguson, C. J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(5), 532–538.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferrari, M., Hunt, C., Harrysunker, A., Abbott, M. J., Beath, A. P., & Einstein, D. A. (2019). Self-compassion interventions and psychosocial outcomes: A meta-analysis of RCTs. Mindfulness, 10(8), 1455–1473.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01134-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finlay-Jones, A. L., Rees, C. S., & Kane, R. T. (2015). Self-compassion, emotion regulation and stress among Australian psychologists: Testing an emotion regulation model of self-compassion using structural equation modeling. PLoS One, 10(7), e0133481.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V. (2006). Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire – development of a short 18-item version (CERQ-short). Personality and Individual Differences, 41(6), 1045–1053.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gelfand, L., & Engelhart, S. (2012). Dynamical systems theory in psychology: Assistance for the lay reader is required. [opinion]. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(382).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00382.
  16. Gilbert, P. (2009). Compassion and cruelty: A biopsychosocial approach. In P. Gilbert (Ed.), The compassionate mind: A new approach to life’s challenges (pp. 9–74). Oakland: New Harbinger.Google Scholar
  17. Glickman, M. E., Rao, S. R., & Schultz, M. R. (2014). False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(8), 850-857.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.012.
  18. Grabe, S., Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 460–476.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Homan, K. J. (2016). Self-compassion and psychological well-being in older adults. Journal of Adult Development, 23(2), 111–119.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-016-9227-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hope, N., Koestner, R., & Milyavskaya, M. (2014). The role of self-compassion in goal pursuit and well-being among university freshmen. Self and Identity, 13(5), 579–593.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2014.889032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Iskender, M. (2011). The influence of self-compassion on academic procrastination and dysfunctional attitudes. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(2), 230–234.Google Scholar
  24. Kees, J., Berry, C., Burton, S., & Sheehan, K. (2017). An analysis of data quality: Professional panels, student subject pools, and Amazon's mechanical Turk. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 141–155.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1269304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Körner, A., Coroiu, A., Copeland, L., Gomez-Garibello, C., Albani, C., Zenger, M., & Brähler, E. (2015). The role of self-compassion in buffering symptoms of depression in the general population. PLoS One, 10(10), e0136598.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kotsou, I., & Leys, C. (2016). Self-compassion scale (SCS): Psychometric properties of the French translation and its relations with psychological well-being, affect and depression. PLoS One, 11(4), e0152880.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kreemers, L. M., van Hooft, E. A. J., & van Vianen, A. E. M. (2018). Dealing with negative job search experiences: The beneficial role of self-compassion for job seekers' affective responses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 106, 165–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lanza, S. T., Rhoades, B. L., Nix, R. L., & Greenberg, M. T. (2010). Modeling the interplay of multilevel risk factors for future academic and behavior problems: A person-centered approach. Development and Psychopathology, 22(2), 313–335.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579410000088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leary, M. R., Tate, E. B., Adams, C. E., Allen, A. B., & Hancock, J. (2007). Self-compassion and reactions to unpleasant self-relevant events: The implications of treating oneself kindly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 887–904.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767-778.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.767.
  31. López, A., Sanderman, R., Ranchor, A. V., & Schroevers, M. J. (2018). Compassion for others and self-compassion: Levels, correlates, and relationship with psychological well-being. Mindfulness, 9(1), 325–331.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0777-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335-343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u.
  33. Lustria, M. L., Noar, S. M., Cortese, J., Van Stee, S. K., Glueckauf, R. L., & Lee, J. (2013). A meta-analysis of web-delivered tailored health behavior change interventions. Journal of Health Communication, 18(9), 1039–1069.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.768727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. MacBeth, A., & Gumley, A. (2012). Exploring compassion: A meta-analysis of the association between self-compassion and psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(6), 545–552.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  37. Merz, E. L., & Roesch, S. C. (2011). A latent profile analysis of the five factor model of personality: Modeling trait interactions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 915–919.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Muris, P., & Petrocchi, N. (2017). Protection or vulnerability? A meta-analysis of the relations between the positive and negative components of self-compassion and psychopathology. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 24(2), 373–383.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muris, P., Meesters, C., Pierik, A., & de Kock, B. (2016a). Good for the self: Self-compassion and other self-related constructs in relation to symptoms of anxiety and depression in non-clinical youths. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(2), 607–617.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0235-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Muris, P., Otgaar, H., & Petrocchi, N. (2016b). Protection as the mirror image of psychopathology: Further critical notes on the self-compassion scale. Mindfulness, 7(3), 787–790.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0509-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Muris, P., Otgaar, H., & Pfattheicher, S. (2019). Stripping the forest from the rotten trees: Compassionate self-responding is the way of coping, but reduced uncompassionate self-responding mainly reflects psychopathology. Mindfulness, 10(1), 196–199.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-1030-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Murn, L. T., & Steele, M. R. (2019). What matters most? Age and gender differences in self-compassion and body attitudes among college students. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2019.1605334.
  43. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus: Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables: User’s Guide (Version 8). Los Angeles, CA: Authors. Google Scholar
  44. Neff, K. D. (2003a). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223–250.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Neff, K. D. (2003b). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2, 85–101.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860390129863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Neff, K. D. (2016a). Does self-compassion entail reduced self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification? A response to Muris, Otgaar, and Petrocchi (2016). Mindfulness, 7(3), 791–797.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0531-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Neff, K. D. (2016b). The self-compassion scale is a valid and theoretically coherent measure of self-compassion. Mindfulness, 7(1), 264–274.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0479-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Neff, K. D., & Germer, C. K. (2013). A pilot study and randomized controlled trial of the mindful self-compassion program. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(1), 28–44.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Neff, K. D., Hsieh, Y., & Dejitterat, K. (2005). Self-compassion, achievement goals, and coping with academic failure. Self and Identity, 4, 263–287.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500444000317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Neff, K. D., Kirkpatrick, K. L., & Rude, S. S. (2007). Self-compassion and adaptive psychological functioning. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 139–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Neff, K. D., Whittaker, T. A., & Karl, A. (2017). Examining the factor structure of the self-compassion scale in four distinct populations: Is the use of a total scale score justified? Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(6), 596–607.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1269334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Neff, K. D., Long, P., Knox, M. C., Davidson, O., Kuchar, A., Costigan, A., Williamson, Z., Rohleder, N., Tóth-Király, I., & Breines, J. G. (2018). The forest and the trees: Examining the association of self-compassion and its positive and negative components with psychological functioning. Self and Identity, 17, 627–645.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2018.1436587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Neff, K. D., Tóth-Király, I., Yarnell, L., Arimitsu, K., Castilho, P., Ghorbani, N., et al. (2019). Examining the factor structure of the self-compassion scale using exploratory SEM bifactor analysis in 20 diverse samples: Support for use of a total score and six subscale scores. Psychological Assessment, 31, 27–45.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nylund, K., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535–569.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Phillips, W. J. (2018). Future-outlook mediates the association between self-compassion and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 135, 143-148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.006.
  56. Phillips, W. J. (2014). Self-compassion and emotion regulation. Unpublished dataset.Google Scholar
  57. Phillips, W. J., & Ferguson, S. J. (2013). Self-compassion: A resource for positive aging. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(4), 529–539.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Raes, F. (2010). Rumination and worry as mediators of the relationship between self-compassion and depression and anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 757–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ruble, D. N., & Martin, C. L. (1998). Gender development. In Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development, Vol. 3, 5th ed. (pp. 933-1016). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  61. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the Dimension of a Model. The Annals of Statistics, 6 (2), 461-464.  https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136.
  62. Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology & Health, 53(1), 80–93.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Veneziani, C. A., Fuochi, G., & Voci, A. (2017). Self-compassion as a healthy attitude toward the self: Factorial and construct validity in an Italian sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 60–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yarnell, L. M., Stafford, R. E., Neff, K. D., Reilly, E. D., Knox, M. C., & Mullarkey, M. (2015). Meta-analysis of gender differences in self-compassion. Self and Identity, 14(5), 499–520.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2015.1029966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zessin, U., Dickhäuser, O., & Garbade, S. (2015). The relationship between self-compassion and well-being: A meta-analysis. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 7(3), 340–364.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12051.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations