Personality traits as predictors of reading comprehension and metacomprehension accuracy
- 16 Downloads
Personality is an aspect of individual differences that contribute to one’s confidence and self-esteem, which can then impact on learning achievement such as reading ability as well as self-assessments of reading comprehension (i.e., metacomprehension). The present study investigated the role of individual differences on the Big Five personality in predicting reading comprehension and metacomprehension accuracy before and after a test. Personality traits were found to uniquely relate to reading comprehension, self-assessed confidence in comprehension, and metacomprehension accuracy. Openness to Experience positively correlated with all measures of confidence assessments on reading comprehension but failed to correlate to actual reading performance, indicating that participants were overconfident in their ability to perform. Extraversion negatively correlated with self-evaluation of comprehension performance and did not predict actual comprehension performance. More findings and educational implications from these findings were discussed to address the potential impacts of personality traits on reading and metacomprehension skills.
KeywordsReading Metacomprehension Calibration of comprehension Personality
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
The project was reviewed and approved by The University of Southern Mississippi Institutional Review Board.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Benedict, R. (1959). Patterns of culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Miramontes, L. G., Del Prado, A. M., & Cabrera, H. F. (2007). Culture and the behavioural manifestations of traits: An application of the act frequency approach. European Journal of Personality, 21, 389–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.631.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992a). The NEO PI/NEO-FFI manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1954). Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732–764.Google Scholar
- John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Lee, Y. T., McCauley, C. R., & Draguns, J. G. (Eds.). (1999). Personality and person perception across cultures. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Lin-Agler, L., Moore, D., & Zabrucky, K. M. (2004). Effects of personality on metacognitive self-assessments. College Student Journal, 38(3), 453–461.Google Scholar
- Stolp, S., & Zabrucky, K. M. (2009). Contributions of metacognitive and self-regulated learning theories to investigations of calibration of comprehension. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(1), 7–31.Google Scholar
- Van Kraayenoord, C. E. (2010). The role of metacognition in reading comprehension. In H. Trolldenier, W. Lenhard, & P. Marx (Eds.), Brennpunkte der Gedachtnishforschung entwicklungs-und padagogisch-psychologische Perspektiven (pp. 277–302). Gottingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar