Advertisement

Can high leader–member exchange spark low creativity among graduate students? The role of stress and personal initiative

  • Di Zhao
  • Jianlin Wu
  • Jibao GuEmail author
Article
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

The factors that influence graduate student creativity have drawn attention in higher education research. It is controversial whether leader–member exchange (LMX), here representing supervisor–student exchange relationship, can promote creativity. Previous studies on the LMX–creativity relationship have ignored the roles of negative psychological processes and personality differences. From the resource allocation perspective, we consider challenge stress and hindrance stress as the mediators and identify personal initiative (PI) as a moderator to examine the relationship between LMX and graduate student creativity. The results obtained from 576 Chinese samples confirm that LMX promotes graduate student creativity by reducing their hindrance stress; the interaction term between high PI and high LMX increases challenge stress. These findings support the importance of developing high quality supervisor–student exchange relationship for graduate students, adding their challenge stress, reducing their hindrance stress, and cultivating their PI so as to improve their creativity.

Keywords

Graduate student creativity LMX Challenge stress Hindrance stress Personal initiative 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (CN) under Grant 1708085MG174; and Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (CN) under Grant 1808085MG223.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (include name of committee + reference number) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atwater, L., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Leader–member exchange, feelings of energy, and involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 264–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baglin, J., Hart, C., & Stow, S. (2017). The statistical knowledge gap in higher degree by research students: The supervisors’ perspective. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(5), 875–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to casual modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285–309.Google Scholar
  6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barry, K., Woods, M., Warnecke, E., Stirling, C., & Martin, A. (2018). Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 1-16.Google Scholar
  8. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berg, S. T. S., Grimstad, A., Škerlavaj, M., & Černe, M. (2017). Social and economic leader–member exchange and employee creative behavior: The role of employee willingness to take risks and emotional carrying capacity. European Management Journal, 35(5), 676–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Binnewies, C., & Wörnlein, S. C. (2011). What makes a creative day? A diary study on the interplay between affect, job stressors, and job control. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(4), 589–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Binnewies, C., Ohly, S., & Sonnentag, S. (2007). Taking personal initiative and communicating about ideas: What is important for the creative process and for idea creativity? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(4), 432–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Breslin, D. (2017). Group creativity and the time of the day. Studies in Higher Education, 1-16.Google Scholar
  13. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brodin, E. M. (2018). The stifling silence around scholarly creativity in doctoral education: Experiences of students and supervisors in four disciplines. Higher Education, 75(4), 655–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Castelló, M., McAlpine, L., & Pyhältö, K. (2017). Spanish and UK post-PhD researchers: Writing perceptions, well-being and productivity. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(6), 1108–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 65–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen, B.-B. (2016). Conscientiousness and everyday creativity among Chinese undergraduate students. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 56–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Culbertson, S. S., Huffman, A. H., & Alden-Anderson, R. (2009). Leader-member exchange and work-family interactions: The mediating role of self-reported challenge- and hindrance-related stress. The Journal of Psychology, 144(1), 15–36.Google Scholar
  19. Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farr-Wharton, B., Charles, M. B., Keast, R., Woolcott, G., & Chamberlain, D. (2018). Why lecturers still matter: The impact of lecturer-student exchange on student engagement and intention to leave university prematurely. Higher Education, 75(1), 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). 4. Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70(2), 139–161.Google Scholar
  24. Gu, J., He, C., & Liu, H. (2017). Supervisory styles and graduate student creativity: the mediating roles of creative self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4), 721–742.Google Scholar
  25. Grady, R. K., La Touche, R., Oslawski-Lopez, J., Powers, A., & Simacek, K. (2014). Betwixt and between: The social position and stress experiences of graduate students. Teaching Sociology, 42(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grawitch, M. J., Barber, L. K., & Justice, L. (2010). Rethinking the work–life interface: It's not about balance, it's about resource allocation. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being, 2(2), 127–159.Google Scholar
  28. Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. Y. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harms, P., Credé, M., Tynan, M., Leon, M., & Jeung, W. (2017). Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 178–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harris, K. J., & Kacmar, K. M. (2006). Too much of a good thing: The curvilinear effect of leader-member exchange on stress. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(1), 65–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hesselgreaves, H., & Scholarios, D. (2014). Leader–member exchange and strain: A study of job demands and role status. Human Resource Management Journal, 24(4), 459–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hobfoll, S. E., Johnson, R. J., Ennis, N., & Jackson, A. P. (2003). Resource loss, resource gain, and emotional outcomes among inner city women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 632–643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jian, G. (2014). Revisiting the association of LMX quality with perceived role stressors: Evidence for inverted U relationships among immigrant employees. Communication Research, 41(1), 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jiang, J., & Yang, B. (2015). Roles of creative process engagement and leader–member exchange in critical thinking and employee creativity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 43(7), 1217–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jung, Y., Sohn, Y. W., & Kim, M. Y. (2018). Emotion regulation and job stress: The mediating effect of relationship quality in the US and Korean samples. Current Psychology, 1–10.Google Scholar
  37. LePine, J. A., LePine, M. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2004). Challenge and hindrance stress: Relationships with exhaustion, motivation to learn, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 883–891.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & LePine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor–hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 764–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Li, N., Liang, J., & Crant, J. M. (2010). The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: A relational perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 395–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mackey, J. D., Perrewé, P. L., & McAllister, C. P. (2017). Do I fit in? Perceptions of organizational fit as a resource in the workplace stress process. Group & Organization Management, 42(4), 455–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Madjar, N., Greenberg, E., & Chen, Z. (2011). Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 730–743.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nejati, M., & Shafaei, A. (2018). Leading by example: The influence of ethical supervision on students’ prosocial behavior. Higher Education, 75(1), 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nunally, J. (1978). Pschometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  44. Pan, W., Sun, L.-Y., & Chow, I. H. S. (2012). Leader-member exchange and employee creativity: Test of a multilevel moderated mediation model. Human Performance, 25(5), 432–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pearsall, M. J., Ellis, A. P., & Stein, J. H. (2009). Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(1), 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peng, J., Chen, Y., Xia, Y., & Ran, Y. (2017). Workplace loneliness, leader-member exchange and creativity: The cross-level moderating role of leader compassion. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 510–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sacramento, C. A., Fay, D., & West, M. A. (2013). Workplace duties or opportunities? Challenge stressors, regulatory focus, and creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(2), 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stroppa, C., & Spieß, E. (2011). International assignments: The role of social support and personal initiative. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(2), 234–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tang, C., & Ding, X. (2014). Graduate students’ creative professional virtual community behaviors and their creativity. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 464–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tordera, N., González-Romá, V., & Peiró, J. M. (2008). The moderator effect of psychological climate on the relationship between leader–member exchange (LMX) quality and role overload. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(1), 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van den Broeck, A., De Cuyper, N., De Witte, H., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). Not all job demands are equal: Differentiating job hindrances and job challenges in the job demands–resources model. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(6), 735–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Volmer, J., Spurk, D., & Niessen, C. (2012). Leader–member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvement. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 456–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang, H., & Li, J. (2015). How trait curiosity influences psychological well-being and emotional exhaustion: The mediating role of personal initiative. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Warner, G. J., Fay, D., Schiefele, U., Stutz, F., & Wollny, A. (2017). Being proactive when reading: Academic personal initiative as a predictor of word comprehension development. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 130–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Webster, J. R., Beehr, T. A., & Love, K. (2011). Extending the challenge-hindrance model of occupational stress: The role of appraisal. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Whitelock, D., Faulkner, D., & Miell, D. (2008). Promoting creativity in PhD supervision: Tensions and dilemmas. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(2), 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wollny, A., Fay, D., & Urbach, T. (2016). Personal initiative in middle childhood: Conceptualization and measurement development. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., & Fischbach, A. (2013). Work engagement among employees facing emotional demands. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(2), 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zacher, H., & Johnson, E. (2015). Leadership and creativity in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(7), 1210–1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zajacova, A., Lynch, S. M., & Espenshade, T. J. (2005). Self-efficacy, stress, and academic success in college. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 677–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). The influence of creative process engagement on employee creative performance and overall job performance: A curvilinear assessment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 862–873.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhang, R., Ewalds-Kvist, B. M., Li, D., & Jiang, J. (2019). Chinese students’ satisfaction with life relative to psychological capital and mediated by purpose in life. Current Psychology, 38(1), 260–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhou, G. (2010). The quality investigation of the PhD candidate education in China. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.Google Scholar
  66. Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations