Classification and differentiation of bladder and bowel related anxieties: A socio-cognitive exploration
- 4 Downloads
The current study aimed to explore the validity of a single, self-report measure for bladder and bowel anxieties (Bladder and Bowel Anxiety Grouping Item; BABAGI), using two appropriate scales entitled the Shy Bladder and Bowel Scale (SBBS) and the Bladder and Bowel Incontinence Phobia Severity Scale (BBIPSS). This study also aimed to examine the similarities and differences in dysfunctional attitudes (DAs), fear of negative and positive evaluation (FNE and FPE), concerns of social reprisal (CSR), and disqualification of positive social outcomes (DPSO) across individuals who self-identify as having paruresis/parcopresis, incontinence anxiety, or neither condition according to the BABAGI measure. Three-hundred-and-six undergraduate students (77.1% female; mean age = 31.18 years) completed a cross-sectional, online study. The results supported the hypothesis that by using the BABAGI, self-reported paruresis/parcopresis could be reliably identified by SBBS scores of above 6.75 and that self-reported incontinence anxiety could be reliably identified by BBIPSS scores above 15.21. The results also supported the hypothesis that individuals who self-identified as having paruresis/parcopresis or incontinence anxiety would score higher in socio-cognitive processes (DAs, FNE, FPE, CSR, DPSO) compared to individuals who self-identified as having neither condition. Given that the paruresis/parcopresis and incontinence anxiety groups do not significantly differ from each other with respect to socio-cognitive processes, this suggests that both sets of conditions share similar underlying psychosocial processes.
KeywordsParuresis Parcopresis Bladder and bowel incontinence anxiety Socio-cognitive Psychosomatic
The authors would like to thank all the individuals who participated in our research.
This research was conducted through the support of the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Provenance and peer review.
Not commissioned, externally peer reviewed.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Al-Osail, A. M., Al-Sheikh, M. H., Al-Osail, E. M., Al-Ghamdi, M. A., Al-Hawas, A. M., Al-Bahussain, A. S., & Al-Dajani, A. A. (2015). Is Cronbach's alpha sufficient for assessing the reliability of the OSCE for an internal medicine course? BMC Research Notes, 8, 582. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1533-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- Cosci, F. (2013). "bowel obsession syndrome" in a patient with chronic constipation. General Hospital Psychiatry, 35(4), 451 e451–451 e453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2012.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Deloitte Access Economics. (2011). The economic impact of incontinence in Australia: Continence Foundation of Australia. Retrieved from.Google Scholar
- Field, A. (2014). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (t. Edition Ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Heimberg, R. G., & Becker, R. E. (2002). Cognitive-behavioral group therapy for social phobia: Basic mechanisms and clinical strategies. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Kamboj, S. K., Langhoff, C., Pajak, R., Zhu, A., Chevalier, A., & Watson, S. (2015). Bowel and bladder-control anxiety: A preliminary description of a viscerally-centred phobic syndrome. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 43(2), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465813000726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kuoch, K. L. J., Austin, D. W., & Knowles, S. R. (2019a). Latest thinking on paruresis and parcopresis: A new distinct diagnostic entity? The Australian Journal of General Practice, 48(4).Google Scholar
- Kuoch, K. L. J., Cook, S., Meyer, D., Austin, D. W., & Knowles, S. R. (2019b). Exploration of the socio-cognitive processes underlying paruresis and parcopresis. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0125-7.
- Kuoch, K. L. J., Meyer, D., Austin, D. W., & Knowles, S. R. (in press). Development and validation of the bladder and bowel incontinence phobia severity scale (BBIPSS). Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.Google Scholar
- Kuoch, K. L. J., Meyer, D., Austin, D. W., & Knowles, S. R. (under review-a). Socio-cognitive processes associated with bladder and bowel incontinence anxiety: A proposed bivalent model.Google Scholar
- Kuoch, K. L. J., Meyer, D., Austin, D. W., & Knowles, S. R. (under review-b). Socio-cognitive processes associated with paruresis and parcopresis symptoms: A proposed bivalent model.Google Scholar
- Martini, F. H., Nath, J. L., & Bartholomew, E. F. (2012). Fundamentals of anatomy & physiology (9th ed.). San Francisco: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Mercer, A. (2016). Oversampling is used to study small groups, not bias poll results. Pew research Centre. Retrieved from http://pewrsr.ch/2eIepyc. Accessed April 2019.
- Norton, C., Whitehead, W., Bliss, D., Metsola, P., & Tries, J. (2016). Conservative and pharamcological management of faecal incontinence in adults. Paper presented at the The International Continence Society. https://www.ics.org/Publications/ICI_4/files-book/comite-16.pdf. Accessed April 2019.
- Rusticus, S. A., & Lovato, C. Y. (2014). Impact of sample size and variability on the power and type I error rates of equivalence tests: A simulation study. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 19(11), 1–10.Google Scholar
- Soifer, S. (2012). Shy bladder syndrome (paruresis): An update: International Paruresis association Inc.Google Scholar
- Soifer, S., Zgourides, G. D., Himle, J., & Pickering, N. L. (2001). Shy bladder syndrome: Your step-by-step guide to overcoming paruresis: New harbinger publications.Google Scholar
- Tape, T. G. (2001). Interpretation of diagnostic tests. Annals of Internal Medicine, 135(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-135-1-200107030-00043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weeks, J. W., Heimberg, R. G., Fresco, D. M., Hart, T. A., Turk, C. L., Schneier, F. R., & Liebowitz, M. R. (2005). Empirical validation and psychometric evaluation of the brief fear of negative evaluation scale in patients with social anxiety disorder. Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-35188.8.131.52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Westin, L. K. (2001). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis: Evaluating discriminance effects among decision support systems. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Receiver-operating-characteristic-(-ROC-)-analysis-Westin-Kallin/dfc1e148b1d08500954f5c78f0a1001affbfc041. Accessed April 2019.