Advertisement

Willingness to share, impulsivity and the Dark Triad traits

  • Marta Malesza
  • Kasper Kalinowski
Article
  • 94 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to test hypotheses regarding a form of social discounting in which the subjective value of a reward decreases as a function of the number of people it is shared with. Along with the Short Dark Triad measure, participants (N = 284) completed a social discounting task in which they were asked to make choices between a hypothetical amount of money to keep for themselves and a hypothetical amount of money to share with a specified number of people. They also competed a delay discounting task, in which they were asked to make choices between immediate small outcomes and delayed bigger outcomes. To probe the unique contribution of three Dark Triad traits predicting both discounting types, we conducted separated multiple linear regression analyses. The study revealed that the higher one’s psychopathy and Machiavellianism, the greater one’s social discounting, indicating more selfishness and lack of willingness to share with other people. On the other hand, the higher one’s narcissism, the smaller one’s social discounting, indicating more willingness to share. These findings place in doubt the selfishness of narcissism. Second, in case of delay discounting, only psychopathy and narcissism predicted steep delay discounting, suggesting that individuals who score high in psychopathy and narcissism tend to obtain rather immediate outcomes. Also, Machiavellianism was not significantly associated with delay discounting. Finally, a positive correlation was observed between delay and social discounting. The results indicated that social discounting was related to, but not equivalent to, delay discounting.

Keywords

Dark triad Delay discounting Social discounting Impulsivity Sharing 

Notes

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Centre in Poland (grant number: 2013/11/N/HS6/01149).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Author Marta Malesza declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Kasper Kalinowski declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

References

  1. Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82(4), 463–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bickel, W. K., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Mueller, E. T., Franck, C. T., Carrin, C., & Gatchalian, K. M. (2012). Altruism in time: Social temporal discounting differentiates smokers from problem drinkers. Psychopharmacology, 224(1), 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell, W. K., & Baumeister, R. F. (2006). Narcissistic personality disorder. In Practitioner’s guide to evidence-based psychotherapy (pp. 423–431). Boston: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, W. K., Bush, C. P., Brunell, A. B., & Shelton, J. (2005). Understanding the social costs of narcissism: The case of the tragedy of the commons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1358–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crysel, L. C., Crosier, B. S., & Webster, G. D. (2013). The Dark Triad and risk behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Wit, H. (2008). Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: A review of underlying processes. Addiction Biology, 14, 22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Wit, H., Flory, J. D., Acheson, A., McCloskey, M., & Manuck, S. B. (2007). IQ and nonplanning impulsivity are independently associated with delay discounting in middle-aged adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(1), 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickinson, K. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2003). Interpersonal analysis of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17(3), 188–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emmons, R. A. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foster, J. D., & Trimm IV, R. F. (2008). On being eager and uninhibited: Narcissism and approach–avoidance motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 1004–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10-year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 769–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gunnthorsdottir, A., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. (2002). Using the Machiavellianism instrument to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2008). Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 217–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrell, W. A., & Hartnagel, T. (1976). The impact of Machiavellianism and the trustfulness of the victim on laboratory theft. Sociometry, 39(2), 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2001). Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 383–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holtzman, N. S., Vazire, S., & Mehl, M. (2010). Sounds like a narcissist: Behavioral manifestations of narcissism in everyday life. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 478–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2008). An algorithm for identifying nonsystematic delay-discounting data. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 16(3), 264–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jonason, P. K., & Krause, L. (2013). The emotional deficits associated with the Dark Triad traits: Cognitive empathy, affective empathy, and alexithymia. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(5), 532–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Teicher, E. A. (2010). Who is James Bond?: The Dark Triad as an agentic social style. Individual Differences Research, 8, 111–120.Google Scholar
  23. Jonason, P. K., Strosser, G. L., Kroll, C. H., Duineveld, J. J., & Baruffi, S. A. (2015). Valuing myself over others: The Dark Triad traits and moral and social values. Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 102–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Learyc & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93–108). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2011). The role of impulsivity in the Dark Triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 679–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3) a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones, B., & Rachlin, H. (2006). Social discounting. Psychological Science, 17, 283–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirby, K. N., & Finch, J. C. (2010). The hierarchical structure of self-reported impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 704–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kurzban, R., & Houser, D. (2001). Individual differences in cooperation in a circular public goods game. European Journal of Personality, 15(S1), S37–S52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lannin, D. G., Guyll, M., Krizan, Z., Madon, S., & Cornish, M. (2014). When are grandiose and vulnerable narcissists least helpful? Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 127–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Locey, M. L., Jones, B. A., & Rachlin, H. (2011). Real and hypothetical rewards. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(6), 552.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Madden, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (2010). Impulsivity: The behavioral and beurological science of discounting. Washington, DC: APA Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Madden, G. J., Begotka, A. M., Raiff, B. R., & Kastern, L. L. (2003). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11(2), 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Malesza, M. (2017). Testing the construct validity of the Discounting Inventory–Psychometric properties of a Polish and German samples. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 48(1), 118–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Malesza, M. (2018a). The effects of the Dark Triad traits in prisoner’s dilemma game. Current Psychology, 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9823-9.
  36. Malesza, M. (2018b). The reduced discounting inventory-construction and initial validation. Current Psychology, 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9972-x.
  37. Malesza, M., & Ostaszewski, P. (2016). Dark side of impulsivity—Associations between the Dark Triad, self-report and behavioral measures of impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malesza, M., & Ostaszewski, P. (2017). Assessing individual differences in discounting: Construction and initial validation of the discounting inventory. Current Psychology, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9754-x.
  39. Malesza, M., Ostaszewski, P., Büchner, S., & Kaczmarek, M. C. (2017). The adaptation of the short Dark Triad personality measure–Psychometric properties of a German sample. Current Psychology, 1–10.Google Scholar
  40. McKerchar, T. L., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2010). On the scaling interpretation of exponents in hyperboloid models of delay and probability discounting. Behavioural Processes, 84(1), 440–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Keith Campbell, W. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Myerson, J., Green, L., & Warusawitharana, M. (2001). Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rachlin, H., & Jones, B. A. (2008). Altruism among relatives and non-relatives. Behavioural Processes, 79, 120–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rachlin, H., & Raineri, A. (1992). Irrationality, impulsiveness, and selfishness as discount reversal effects. In G. Loewenstein & J. Elster (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 93–118). New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  46. Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., & Cross, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Raskin, R., & Hall, C. S. (1981). The narcissistic personality inventory: Alternative form reliability and further evidence of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45(2), 159–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reynolds, B., Ortengren, A., Richards, J. B., & de Wit, H. (2006). Dimensions of impulsive behavior: Personality and behavioral measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith, C. L., & Hantula, D. A. (2008). Methodological considerations in the study of delay discounting in intertemporal choice: A comparison of tasks and modes. Behavior Research Methods, 40(4), 940–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vazire, S., & Funder, D. C. (2006). Impulsivity and the self-defeating behavior of narcissists. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 154–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Williams, K.M., Nathanson, C., & Paulhus, D.L. (2003). Structure and validity of the self-report psychopathy scale-III in normal populations. Toronto, Canada: Presentation at the 111th annual convention of the American Psychological Association. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta Malesza
    • 1
  • Kasper Kalinowski
    • 2
  1. 1.WarsawPoland
  2. 2.Faculty of Education, Psychology and SociologyUniversity of Zielona GóraZielona GóraPoland

Personalised recommendations