Advertisement

Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Media Literacy Scale for university students

  • Dilek Demir
  • Murat BektasEmail author
  • Senay Demir
  • Ilknur Bektas
Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

It is very important to determine the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages that cause diseases, such as obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease in late adolescence. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Media Literacy Scale aimed at university students. This methodological-descriptive-correlational study was conducted with 884 university students between September 2018 and December 2018. The data were collected using a socio-demographic data collection form and the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Media Literacy Scale. Factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha, and item-total correlation were used to evaluate the data. It was determined that the scale consists of 19 items and three sub-dimensions; the three sub-dimensions explained 49.9% of the total variance. In both the explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses, all the factor loads were found to be >0.30. In confirmatory factor analysis, it was found that all of the fit indices were > 0.85 and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was <0.080. Cronbach’s alpha was found to be 0.86 for the entire scale; the Cronbach’s alpha values for all three sub-dimensions were found to range between 0.65 and 0.84. In this study, the Turkish version of the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Media Literacy Scale aimed at university students was found to be a valid and reliable measurement tool for the Turkish sample.

Keywords

Sugar Beverage Sugar-sweetened beverage Media Literacy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The cooperation of the professors and students is gratefully acknowledged.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the individual participants that were included in the study.

References

  1. Aksayan, S., & Gözüm, S. (2002). Kültürlerarası ölçek uyarlaması için rehber I: Ölçek uyarlama aşamaları ve dil uyarlaması. Hemşirelik Araştırma Dergisi, 4(1), 9–14.Google Scholar
  2. Aufderheide, P. (1993). Media literacy: A report of the national leadership conference on media literacy. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Bogart, L. M., Cowgill, B. O., Sharma, A. J., Uyeda, K., Sticklor, L. A., Alijewicz, K. E., & Schuster, M. A. (2013). Parental and home environmental facilitators of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among overweight and obese Latino youth. Academic Pediatrics, 13, 348–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Çam, M. O., & Baysan-Arabacı, L. (2010). Qualitative and quantitative steps on attitude scale construction. Hemar-G, 12(2), 59–71.Google Scholar
  5. Chandoni, P., & Wansink, B. (2006). Can “low-fat” nutrition labels lead to obesity? American Marketing Association, 43, 605–617.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, Y., Porter, K. J., Estabrooks, P. A., & Zoellner, J. (2017). Development and evaluation of the sugar-sweetened beverages media literacy (SSB-ML) scale and its relationship with SSB consumption. Health Communication, 32(10), 1310–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development, theory and applications (3rd ed.pp. 31–59). India: SAGE Publication Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Federal Trade Commission. (2008). Marketing food to children and adolescents: A review of industry expenditures, activities, and self-regulation. http://www.ftc.gov/reports/marketing-food-children-adolescents-review-industry expenditures-activities-self-regulation. Accessed 20 Mar 2019.
  9. Harris, J. L., & Bargh, J. A. (2009). Television viewing and unhealthy diet: Implications for children and media interventions. Health Communication, 24, 660–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hayran, M., & Hayran, M. (2011). Basic statistic for health researh. Ankara, Art Ofset Matbacılık Yayıncılık Org. Ltd Şti, 132–332.Google Scholar
  11. Healy, A. M. (2013). Artificial sweeteners and high-fructose corn syrup: Effects on diabetes and weight. Integrative Medicine Alert, 16, 114–119.Google Scholar
  12. Hennessy, M., Bleakley, A., Piotrowski, J. T., Mallya, G., & Jordan, A. (2015). Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption by adult caregivers and their children: The role of drink features and advertising exposure. Health Education & Behavior, 42, 677–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., Michael, R., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.Google Scholar
  14. Jeong, S., Cho, H., & Hwang, Y. (2012). Media literacy interventions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 62, 454–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jonhson, B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (pp. 190–222). California: SAGE Publication, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Kit, B. K., Fakhouri, T. H. I., Park, S., Nielsen, S. J., & Ogden, C. L. (2013). Trends in sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among youth and adults in the United States: 1999–2010. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 98, 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Malik, V. S., Pan, A., Willett, W. C., & Hu, F. B. (2013). Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 98(4), 1084–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nielsen, S. J., & Pompkin, B. M. (2004). Changes in beverage intake between 1977 and 2001. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27, 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (2010). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Özdamar, K. (2005). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi. 4. Baskı. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi, 661–73.Google Scholar
  21. Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Primack, B. A., & Hobbs, R. (2009). Association of various components of media literacy and adolescent smoking. American Journal of Health Behavior, 33, 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rattray, J., & Jones, M. C. (2007). Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16, 234–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sanchez-Lozada, L. G., Tapia, E., Jimenez, A., Bautista, P., Cristóbal, M., Nepomuceno, T., et al. (2007). Fructose-induced metabolic syndrome is associated with glomerular hypertension and renal microvascular damage in rats. American Journal of Physiology. Renal Physiology, 292, 423–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Scheibe, C., & Rogow, F. (2004). 12 basic principles for incorporating media literacy and critical thinking into any curriculum. Ithaca: Project Look Sharp.Google Scholar
  26. Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik (reliability and validity in cocial and behavioral measurement) (1st ed.p. 107). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.Google Scholar
  27. Şimşek, Ö. F. (2010). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. İstanbul: Ekinoks.Google Scholar
  28. Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Welsh, J. A., Sharma, A. J., Grellinger, L., & Vos, M. B. (2011). Consumption of added sugars is decreasing in the United States. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 94(3), 726–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xi, B., Huang, Y., Reilly, K. H., Li, S., Zheng, R., Barrio-Lopez, M. T., Martinez-Gonzalez, M. A., & Zhou, D. (2015). Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of hypertension and CVD: A dose-response meta-analysis. The British Journal of Nutrition, 113(5), 709–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pediatric NursingDokuz Eylul University Health Science InstituteİzmirTurkey
  2. 2.Dokuz Eylul University Health Science InstituteIzmirTurkey
  3. 3.Selcuk University Vocational School of Health ServicesKonyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations