Advertisement

Dark triad and impulsivity – an ecological momentary assessment approach

  • Marta Malesza
  • Kasper Kalinowski
Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the Dark Triad traits (psychopathy, narcissism and Machiavellianism) are associated with impulsivity. However, prior work has relied exclusively on retrospective assessment via self-report questionnaires or on one-time behavioral measures of impulsive behavior. Therefore, we examined how the Dark Triad traits relate to moment-to-moment impulsivity as people navigate through their natural environment in a given day. For 14 days, 283 non-clinical adult volunteers carried smartphone devices to monitor their daily impulsive behaviors. Participants were randomly prompted five times per day. In addition, the pattern of correspondence between the moment-to-moment impulsivity monitoring and the already established impulsivity assessment methods (retrospective self-report questionnaire, i.e., 48-item Discounting Inventory; behavioral task, i.e., Delay-Discounting task with pairs of hypothetical choices) was tested. Strong correlations were found between psychopathy, narcissism, and self-reported impulsivity. Moreover, those traits showed weaker (but still significant) correlations with both, the one-time behavioral and the momentary monitoring measures of impulsivity. Machiavellianism did not correlate with any type of impulsivity assessment. When testing the association between the self-report, behavioral, and momentary measures of impulsivity, analysis revealed weak to moderate correlations. Reliably, these results support other recent findings suggesting that those three impulsivity tasks probably measure different constructs.

Keywords

Dark triad Impulsivity Ecological momentary assessment Self-report assessment Behavioral assessment 

Notes

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Center in Poland (grant number: 2013/11/N/HS6/01149).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Author Marta Malesza declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Kasper Kalinowski declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

References

  1. Barratt, E. S., & Patton, J. H. (1983). Impulsivity: Cognitive, behavioral and psychophysiological correlates. In M. Zuckerman (Ed.), Biological bases of sensation seeking, impulsivity and anxiety (pp. 77–116). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Book, A., Visser, B. A., & Volk, A. A. (2015). Unpacking “evil”: Claiming the core of the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 73, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Book, A., Visser, B. A., Blais, J., Hosker-Field, A., Methot-Jones, T., Gauthier, N. Y., Volk, A., Holden, R. R., & D'Agata, M. T. (2016). Unpacking more “evil”: What is at the core of the dark tetrad? Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 269–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapple, C. L., & Johnson, K. A. (2007). Gender differences in impulsivity. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5(3), 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Crysel, L. C., Crosier, B. S., & Webster, G. D. (2013). The dark triad and risk behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Wit, H., Flory, J. D., Acheson, A., McCloskey, M., & Manuck, S. B. (2007). IQ and nonplanning impulsivity are independently associated with delay discounting in middle-aged adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(1), 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ebner-Priemer, U. W., & Trull, T. J. (2009). Ecological momentary assessment of mood disorders and mood dysregulation. Psychological Assessment, 21(4), 463–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emmons, R. A. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: A 10-year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2008). Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 217–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ioannidis, J. P. (2008). Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology, 19(5), 640–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jakobwitz, S., & Egan, V. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(2), 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jonason, P. K., & Tost, J. (2010). I just cannot control myself: The dark triad and self-control. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 611–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. D., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The dark triad: Facilitating a short‐term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality: Published for the European Association of Personality Psychology, 23(1), 5–18.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2011). The role of impulsivity in the dark triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 679–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirby, K. N., & Finch, J. C. (2010). The hierarchical structure of self-reported impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 704–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lane, S., Cherek, D. R., Rhodes, H. M., Pietras, C. J., & Techeremissine, O. V. (2003). Relationships among laboratory and psychometric measures of impulsivity: Implications in substance abuse and dependence. Addictive Disorders and Their Treatment, 2, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Logue, A. W., & Anderson, Y. D. (2001). Higher-education administrators: When the future does not make a difference. Psychological Science, 12(4), 276–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Madden, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (Eds.). (2010). Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  21. Malesza, M. (2017). Testing the construct validity of the discounting inventory–psychometric properties of a Polish and German samples. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 48(1), 118–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Malesza, M. (2018a). The effects of potentially real and hypothetical rewards on effort discounting in a student sample. Personality and Individual Differences.Google Scholar
  23. Malesza, M. (2018b). The effects of the dark triad traits in prisoner’s dilemma game. Current Psychology, 1–8.Google Scholar
  24. Malesza, M. (2018c). The reduced discounting inventory-construction and initial validation. Current Psychology, 1–8.Google Scholar
  25. Malesza, M., & Maczuga, M. (2017). Reliability of the discounting inventory: An extension into substance-use population. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 48(2), 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malesza, M., & Ostaszewski, P. (2016). Dark side of impulsivity—Associations between the dark triad, self-report and behavioral measures of impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malesza, M., & Ostaszewski, P. (2017). Assessing individual differences in discounting: Construction and initial validation of the discounting inventory. Current Psychology, 1–13.Google Scholar
  28. Myerson, J., Green, L., & Warusawitharana, M. (2001). Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ramsey, A. T., Wetherell, J. L., Depp, C., Dixon, D., & Lenze, E. (2016). Feasibility and acceptability of smartphone assessment in older adults with cognitive and emotional difficulties. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 34(2), 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raskin, R., & Hall, C. S. (1981). The narcissistic personality inventory: Alternative form reliability and further evidence of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45(2), 159–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reynolds, B., Ortengren, A., Richards, J. B., & de Wit, H. (2006). Dimensions of impulsive behavior: Personality and behavioral measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richards, J. B., Zhang, L., Mitchell, S., & de Wit, H. (1999). Delay and probability discounting in a model of impulsive behavior: Effect of alcohol. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vazire, S., & Funder, D. C. (2006). Impulsivity and the selfdefeating behavior of narcissists. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 154–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vize, C. E., Lynam, D. R., Collison, K. L., & Miller, J. D. (2018). Differences among dark triad components: A meta-analytic investigation. Personality Disorders, Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(2), 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams, K.M., Nathanson, C., & Paulhus, D.L. (2003). Structure and validity of the self-report psychopathy scale-III in normal populations. Toronto, Canada: Presentation at the 111th annual convention of the American Psychological Association. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta Malesza
    • 1
  • Kasper Kalinowski
    • 2
  1. 1.WarsawPoland
  2. 2.Faculty of Education, Psychology and SociologyUniversity of Zielona GóraZielona GóraPoland

Personalised recommendations