Who is more utilitarian? Negative affect mediates the relation between control deprivation and moral judgment
This research tried to examine the effect of sense of control on moral judgments and the mediating roles of positive and negative affect. Sixty-one Chinese college students were randomly assigned to control-deprivation group and non-control deprivation group. After finishing an unsolvable “concept-formation task”, in which control deprivation was manipulated, participants rated sense of control, affective states, and made judgments in personal and impersonal moral dilemmas. Results showed that individuals in control deprivation condition were more likely to make utilitarian judgment in personal moral dilemmas rather than impersonal dilemmas. Furthermore, the negative affective states caused by control deprivation mediate the relationship between control deprivation and utilitarian moral judgment. Taken together, these results support dual-process model of moral judgment and control motivation theory.
KeywordsMoral judgment Control deprivation Emotion Utilitarian
The authors would like to thank Research Institute in Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education (19YJC190031), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81571337), Youth Teacher Initial Funding in Zhengzhou University (32220389) for funding this research.We thank the two anonymous reviewers who helped us improve the manuscript. No financial interest and conflict exist in present research.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Cummins, D. D., & Cummins, R. C. (2012). Emotion and deliberative reasoning in moral judgment. Frontier of Psychology, 3, 328.Google Scholar
- Greene, J. D. (2007). The secret joke of Kant’s soul. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology. The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, brain disorders, and development (Vol. 3, pp. 35–80). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Mcintosh, R., Ambron, E., & Della Sala, S. (2008). Evidence for an attraction account of closing-in behaviour. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(3), 376-394.Google Scholar
- Pittman, T. S. (1993). Control motivation and attitude change Control motivation and social cognition (pp. 157–175): Springer.Google Scholar
- Ross, C. E, & Mirowsky, J. (2013). The sense of personal control: Social structural causes and emotional consequences Handbook of the sociology of mental health (pp. 379–402): Springer.Google Scholar
- Shamloo, Z., & Cox, M. (2012). Does enhancing sense of control improve cognitive performance and motivational structure? Paper presented at the International Journal of Psychology.Google Scholar
- Warburton, W. A., Kipling D. Williams, & David R. Cairns. (2006). When ostracism leads to aggression: The moderating effects of control deprivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 213-220.Google Scholar