Adaptation of the prosocial behavioral intentions scale for use with Turkish participants: Assessments of validity and reliability
- 66 Downloads
This study adapted and investigated the psychometric properties of the Prosocial Behavioral Intentions Scale (PBIS) in a Turkish sample in four sub-studies. Findings of a confirmatory factor analysis (Study 1), and tests of internal consistency and test-retest reliability (Study 2), concurrent validity (Study 3), convergent, and discriminant validity (Study 4), have been presented in this article. The confirmatory factor analysis conducted in Study 1 indicated that the unidimensional-factor structure had the best fit to the data. Study 2 found that the internal consistency value was acceptable and test-retest reliability over a 4-week period was adequate. Study 3 supported the concurrent validity of the Turkish PBIS with reference to altruism and empathy. In Study 4, convergent validity was established based on the correlation between the Adult Prosocialness Scale (APS) and Turkish PBIS. Factor loadings and t-values of the items, composite reliability (CR), and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) value of the Turkish PBIS were optimal. Discriminant validity was confirmed based on the correlation between the Turkish PBIS and Social Appearance Anxiety Scale (SAAS), with adequate cross-loadings of the PBIS and the Fornell and Larcker criterion. Thus, the Turkish PBIS was found to be a brief, valid, and reliable measure of prosocial behaviors.
KeywordsProsocial behavioral intentions Adaptation Validation Turkish culture
The author created the idea for this study; developed the protocol, methods, and data analysis; and wrote the manuscript by himself.
This study was funded by the author.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The contents of this manuscript have not been copyrighted or published previously and not currently under consideration for publication elsewhere. The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bağcı, B., & Öztürk-Samur, A. (2016). Validity and reliability study of prosocialness scales for children and adults. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 17(3), 59–79.Google Scholar
- Batson, C. D., & Powell, A. A. (2003). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology (pp. 463–484). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc..Google Scholar
- Bayraktar, F., Kındap, Y., Kumru, A., & Sayıl, M. (2010). Olumlu sosyal ve saldırgan davranışlar ölçeğinin ergen örnekleminde psikometrik açıdan incelenmesi [testing the reliability and validity of the prosocial and aggressive behaviors questionnaire in a Turkish adolescent sample]. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları (Turkish Psychological Review), 13(26), 1–13.Google Scholar
- Bierhoff, H. W. (2002). Prosocial behaviour. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- Doğan, T., & Akinci Çötok, N. (2011). Adaptation of the short form of the Oxford happiness questionnaire into Turkish: A validity and reliability study. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 4(36), 165–172.Google Scholar
- Durualp, E., & Aral, N. (2010). Altı yaşındaki çocukların sosyal becerilerine oyun temelli sosyal beceri eğitiminin etkisinin incelenmesi [a study on the effects of play-based social skills training on social skills of six-year-old children]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education), 39, 160–172.Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial Development. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, social, emotional and personality development in (5th ed., pp. 701–778). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R., & Shea, C. (1989). Gender differences in empathy and prosocial moral reasoning: Empirical investigations. In M. M. Brabeck (Ed.), Who cares? Theory, research, and educational implications of the ethic of care (pp. 127–143). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Ersanlı, K., & Doğru-Çabuker, N. (2015). Diğerkâmlık Ölçeği’nin psikometrik özellikleri [psychometric properties of the altruism scale]. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (Electronic Journal of Social Sciences), 14(52), 43–53.Google Scholar
- Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
- Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2008). Psychometrics: An introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Gaskin, J., & Lim, J. (2016). Master validity tool, AMOS Plugin. Gaskination's StatWiki. http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com. Accessed 6 January 2019.
- Gilliland, J. M., Windle, M., Grunbaum, J. A., Yancey, A., Hoelscher, D., Tortolero, S. R., & Schuster, M. (2006). Body image and children’s mental health related behaviors: Göka results from the healthy passages study. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsl008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Göka, E. (2006). Türk Grup Davranışı [Turkish Group Behavior]. Istanbul: Aşina Publishing.Google Scholar
- Hair, J. F., Money, H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. (2007). Research methods for business. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd..Google Scholar
- Hart, T. A., Flora, D. B., Palyo, S. A., Fresco, D. M., Holle, C., & Heimberg, R. G. (2008). Development and examination of the social appearance anxiety scale. Assessment, 15(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107306673
- Hastings, P. D., Utendale, W. T., & Sullivan, C. (2006). The socialization of prosocial development. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Karadağ, E., & Mutafçılar, I. (2009). Prososyal davranış ekseninde özgecilik üzerine bir çözümleme [A theoretic analysis on altruism in prosocial behavior axis]. Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences), 8, 41–69.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Kumru, A., Carlo, G., & Edwards, C. P. (2004). Olumlu sosyal davranişlarin ilişkisel, kültürel, bilişsel ve duyuşsal bazi değişkenlerle ilişkisi [Relational, cultural, cognitive, and affective predictors of prosocial behaviors]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi (Turkish Journal of Psychology), 19(54), 109–125.Google Scholar
- Özdemir, Z. (2010). Lise öğrencilerinin prososyal davranişlarinin mizah, öfke ve utangaçlik düzeylerine göre incelenmesi [Studying the prosocial behavior of high school students according to their humor, anger and shyness levels]. Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences: Unpublished master's thesis. Ankara.Google Scholar
- Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Totan, T., Doğan, T., & Sapmaz, F. (2012). The Toronto empathy questionnaire: Evaluation of psychometric properties among Turkish university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 179–198.Google Scholar
- Uzmen, S., & Mağden, D. (2002). Okul öncesi eğitim kurumlarinda devam eden alti yaş çocuklarinin prososyal davranişlarinin resimli çocuk kitaplari ile desteklenmesi [Enhancing five-six years old preschool children’s prosocial behaviors by using picture books]. M.U. Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 15, 193–212.Google Scholar
- Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, A. J., Winter, A. F. D., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2008). Prosocial and antisocial behavior in preadolescence: Teachers' and parents' perceptions of the behavior of girls and boys. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(3), 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025408089274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Yoleri, S., & Sevinç, M. (2014). Does child’s temperament determine the social skills of boys and girls? International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 4(2), 516–523.Google Scholar