What is in your hand influences your purchase intention: Effect of motor fluency on motor simulation
- 33 Downloads
With the development of the advertisement industry, consumers are surrounded by increasing numbers of different types of visual stimuli (e.g., images on billboards, websites, and newspapers or videos on TV and social media). The present research aims to explore the effect of the connection between visual stimuli and objects in consumers’ hands on purchase intention based on motor simulation theory and motor fluency. The results of two studies demonstrate that when right-handed consumers review an image of food with tableware on the right (vs. left) side, they will have higher purchase intention for the food, while the effect reverses when their right hand is under high motor resource load. In addition, when right-handed consumers review an image of food with tableware on the right side and have nothing (vs. an object) in their right hand, they will have higher purchase intention for the food. However, if the image does not include tableware, placing tableware (vs. nothing or other objects) in the right hand of the consumers will induce higher purchase intention for the food. Our findings not only contribute to the literature on motor simulation, motor fluency, and motor resources but also provide valid insights for managerial applications.
KeywordsMotor simulation Motor fluency Motor resources Handedness Conflict
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gordon, R. M. (1986). Folk psychology as simulation. Mind & Language, 1(2), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1986.tb00324.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grèzes, J., & Decety, J. (2001). Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0193(200101)12:1<1::AID-HBM10>3.0.CO;2-V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moran, A., Guillot, A., MacIntyre, T., & Collet, C. (2012). Re-imagining motor imagery: Building bridges between cognitive neuroscience and sport psychology: Re-imagining motor imagery. British Journal of Psychology, 103(2), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02068.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- O’Shea, H., & Moran, A. (2017). Does motor simulation theory explain the cognitive mechanisms underlying motor imagery? A critical review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00072.
- Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology Inc, 8(4), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, R., Zhang, T., Liu, T., Liu, D., Li, M., Li, F., et al. (2016). Structural and functional correlates of motor imagery BCI performance: Insights from the patterns of fronto-parietal attention network. Neuroimage, 134, 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar