Advertisement

Is grit worth the investment? How grit compares to other psychosocial factors in predicting achievement

  • Dante D. DixsonEmail author
Article
  • 67 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, I examined the internal consistency and structural validity of scores on the Short Grit scale, Academic Self-Concept scale, and Engagement scale in a sample of 1154 urban adolescent high school students. I also assessed how much of GPA’s variance is explained by grit, academic self-concept, and educational engagement. Results suggested that the scores on all three scales were structurally sound and internally consistent. However, grit and engagement explained considerably less of GPA’s variance in this urban sample than academic self-concept. Therefore, this study’s findings indicate that school improvement and intervention programs might be more effective if they are focused on increasing more established psychosocial factors like academic self-concept rather than grit.

Keywords

Academic achievement Psychosocial factors Grit Academic self-concept 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aarø, L. E., Flisher, A. J., Kaaya, S., Onya, H., Namisi, F. S., & Wubs, A. (2009). Parental education as an indicator of socioeconomic status: Improving quality of data by requiring consistency across measurement occasions. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 37(Suppl 2), 16–27.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494808086917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alan, S., Boneva, T., & Ertac, S. (2016). Ever failed, try again, succeed better: Results from a randomized educational intervention on grit (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2761390). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://humcap.uchicago.edu/RePEc/hka/wpaper/Alan_Boneva_Ertac_2015_grit.pdf
  3. Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Fallu, J.-S., & Pagani, L. S. (2009). Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 651–670.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Areepattamannil, S., & Freeman, J. G. (2008). Academic achievement, academic self-concept, and academic motivation of immigrant adolescents in the greater Toronto area secondary schools. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19, 700–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bacon, L. S. (2011). Academic self-concept and academic achievement of African American students transitioning from urban to rural schools. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3473142).Google Scholar
  6. Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1–40.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302408382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen R. M. (2015). Teaching character: Grit, privilege, and America’s obsession with novelty. American Prospect. Retrieved from http://prospect.org/article/can-grit-save-american-education.
  8. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 173–178.Google Scholar
  9. Credé, M., Tynan, M. C., & Harms, P. D. (2016). Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology., 113, 492–511.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Datu, J., Valdez, J., & King, R. (2016). Perseverance counts but consistency does not! Validating the short grit scale in a collectivist setting. Current Psychology, 35, 121–130.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9374-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dixson, D. D., Worrell, F. C., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Subotnik, R. F. (2016). Beyond perceived ability: The contribution of psychosocial factors to academic performance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1377, 67–77.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dotterer, A. M., & Lowe, K. (2011). Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 1649–1660.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9647-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duckworth, A. (2013, April). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/angela_lee_duckworth_grit_the_power_of_passion_and_perseverance#t-352832.
  14. Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance. New York, NY: Scribner.Google Scholar
  15. Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the short grit scale (grit–S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 166–174.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087–1101.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., & Seligman, M. (2009). Positive predictors of teacher effectiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 540–547.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903157232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dweck, C. S. (2007). Mindset—The new psychology of success: How we can learn to fulfill our potential. New York, NY: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  19. Education Trends. (2014, January). The best measure of success and how to teach it. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/blog/true-grit-measure-teach-success-vicki-davis
  20. Farrington, C. A., Roderick, M., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T. S., Johnson, D. W., & Beechum, N. O. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners: The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance-a critical literature review. Chicago, Il: Consortium on Chicago School Research.Google Scholar
  21. Fredericks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148–162.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ghazvini, S. D. (2011). Relationships between academic self-concept and academic performance in high school students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1034–1039.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heckman, J. J., & Rubinstein, Y. (2001). The importance of noncognitive skills: Lessons from the GED testing program. The American Economic Review, 91, 145–149 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2677749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herold, B. (2015, January 24). Is ‘grit’ racist? Education Week. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/DigitalEducation/2015/01/is_grit_racist.html.
  26. Hill, P. L., Burrow, A. L., & Bronk, K. C. (2016). Persevering with positivity and purpose: An examination of purpose commitment and positive affect as predictors of grit. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 257–269.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9593-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. (2014). Predicting school success: Comparing conscientiousness, grit, and emotion regulation ability. Journal of Research in Personality, 52, 29–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jang, H. (2008). Supporting students’ motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 798–811.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kenny, D. A. (2014, October 6). Measuring model fit. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm.
  30. Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44, 486–507.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Komarraju, M., Musulkin, S., & Bhattacharya, G. (2010). Role of student–faculty interactions in developing college students’ academic self-concept, motivation, and achievement. Journal of College Student Development, 51, 332–342.  https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuncel, N. R., Credé, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point average, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75, 63–82.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11, 320–341.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Möller, J., Pohlmann, B., Köller, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2009). A meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1129–1167.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309337522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. National Science Foundation. (2019). Award search. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/simpleSearchResult?queryText=grit&ActiveAwards=true.
  36. Newton, R. R., & Rudestam, K. E. (1999). Your statistical consultant: Answers to your data analysis questions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  38. Palmer, R. T., & Strayhorn, T. L. (2008). Mastering one’s own fate: Non-cognitive factors associated with the success of African American males at an HBCU. NASAP, 11, 126–143. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/robert_palmer/6.
  39. Reynolds, W. M. (1988). Measurement of academic self-concept in college students. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 223–240.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5202_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reynolds, W. M., Ramirez, M. P., Magriña, A., & Allen, J. E. (1980). Initial development and validation of the academic self-concept scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 1013–1016.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353–387.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261–288.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shechtman, N., DeBarger, A. H., Dornsife, C., Rosier, S., & Yarnall, L. (2013). Promoting grit, tenacity, and perseverance: Critical factors for success in the 21st century. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
  44. Singh, K., & Duggal Jha, S. (2008). Positive and negative affect, and grit as predictors of happiness and life satisfaction. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 34, 40–45.Google Scholar
  45. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765–781.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Strayhorn, T. L. (2013). What role does grit play in the academic success of black male collegians at predominantly white institutions? Journal of African American Studies, 18, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-012-9243-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tough, P. (2013). How children succeed: Grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character. New York, NY: Mariner Books.Google Scholar
  49. University of California, Los Angeles. (2015). Welcome to UCLA’s GRIT program! Retrieved from http://www.grit.ucla.edu/About/Mission
  50. University of Chicago. (2016, February 16). $100 million initiative enhances commitment to lower-income students. Retrieved from http://www.uchicago.edu/features/100_million_initiative_enhances_commitment_to_lower_income_students/.
  51. Vela, J. C., Lu, M. P., Lenz, A. S., & Hinojosa, K. (2015). Positive psychology and familial factors as predictors of Latina/o students’ psychological grit. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 37, 287–303.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986315588917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Von Culin, K. R., Tsukayama, E., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Unpacking grit: Motivational correlates of perseverance and passion for long-term goals. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9, 306–312.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.898320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weinstein, R. S., & Worrell, F. C. (Eds.). (2016). Achieving college dreams: A university-charter district partnership. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Wellborn, J. G. (1992). Engaged and disaffected action: The conceptualization and measurement of motivation in the academic domain. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53(2-B), 1099.Google Scholar
  55. Wilcken, A. J. (2014). The role of relationship quality and relatedness to teachers in engagement and achievement in elementary and middle school: A longitudinal study (order no. AAI3560230). East Lansing, Mi: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  56. Wolters, C. A., & Hussain, M. (2015). Investigating grit and its relations with college students’ self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 10, 293–311.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9128-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yeager, D. S., & Walton, G. M. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They’re not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81, 267–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (1999). The big-fish–little-pond effect for academic self-concept, test anxiety, and school grades in gifted children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 305–329.  https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School Psychology, Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, College of EducationMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations