The positive and negative rumination scale: Development and preliminary validation
- 18 Downloads
Two studies with data from 1671 students are presented describing the development and preliminary validation of the Positive and Negative Rumination Scale (PANRS), a brief measure with 2 s-order factors: Positive Rumination consisting of 2 first-order factors (i.e., Enjoy Happiness and Positive Coping) and Negative Rumination consisting of 3 first-order factors (i.e., Suppress Happiness, Self Deny and Negative Attribution). Results from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the measure’s 5 first-order and 2 s-order factors structure. Moreover, correlation analyses provided first evidence for the subscales’ differential validity: Positive Rumination showed positive correlations with positive indicators of psychological adjustment (e.g., life satisfaction) and negative correlations with negative indicators of psychological adjustment (e.g., depression), whereas Negative Rumination showed negative correlations with positive indicators of psychological adjustment (e.g., life satisfaction) and positive correlations with negative indicators of psychological adjustment (e.g., depression). In addition, all PANRS scores showed satisfactory reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) and temporal stability (test-retest). Overall the findings suggest that the PANRS is a reliable and valid instrument to assess positive and negative aspects of Rumination.
KeywordsPositive rumination Negative rumination Life satisfaction Depression
This study was funded by Zhejiang Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Research Program of China (17NDJC198YB) and Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education Planning Fund (17YJA1900144).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were approved by the Research Committee of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences at Zhejiang University.
Conflict of Interest
We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.
Hongfei Yang has received a grant from Zhejiang Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Research Program of China (17NDJC198YB) and a grant from Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education Planning Fund (17YJA1900144).
- Barnard, P., Watkins, E., Mackintosh, B., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (2007). Getting stuck in a mental rut: Some process and experiential attributes. In Paper presented at the 35th congress of the British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies. Brighton: England.Google Scholar
- Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Cohen, S., Karmarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 24, 385–396.Google Scholar
- Frost, R. O., Heimberg, R. G., Holt, C. S., Mattia, J. I., Neubauer, A. L. (1993). A comparison of two measures of perfection. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 119–126.Google Scholar
- Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (5th ed.pp. 47–49). Upper Saddle River.Google Scholar
- Han, X., & Yang, H. (2009). Chinese version of Nolen-Hoeksema ruminative responses scale (RRS) used in 912 college students: Reliability and validity (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 17(5), 550–551 549.Google Scholar
- Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158–176). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Kavadia, N., Polemidia, K., & Cyprus, L. (2013). Coefficient alpha interpret with caution. Europe's Journal of Psychology, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Maree, M., & Abbott, M. J. (2017). Negative rumination in social anxiety: A randomised trial investigating the effects of a brief intervention on cognitive processes before, during and after a social situation. Journal of Behavioral Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 55, 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martin, L., & Tesser, A. (1996). Some ruminative thoughts. In R. Wyer (Ed.), Advances in Social Cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1–47). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82.Google Scholar
- Pfeiler, T, M., Wenzel, M., Weber, H., & Kubiak, T. (2017). Adaptive modes of rumination: The role of subjective anger. Cognition and Emotion, 31, 580–589.Google Scholar
- Prinz, U., Nutzinger, D. O., Schulz, H., Petermann, F., Braukhaus, C., & Andreas, S. (2013). Comparative psychometric analyses of the SCL-90-R and its short versions in patients with affective disorders. BMC Psychiatry, 104, 1–9.Google Scholar
- Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Smith, J. M. & Alloy, L. B. (2009). A roadmap to rumination: A review of the definition, assessment, and conceptualization of this multifaceted construct. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 116–128.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. 4. Needham Heights: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Wang, D. (1995). The reliability and validity of UCLA loneliness scale of Chinese version (in Chinese). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 3(1), 20–24.Google Scholar
- Whiteman, R. C., & Mangels, J. A. (2016). Rumination and rebound from failure as a function of gender and time on task. Brain Science, 6(7), 1–26.Google Scholar
- Yang, H., Guo, W., Yu, S., Chen, L., Zhang, H., Pan, L., Wang, C., & Chang, E. C. (2016). Personal and family perfectionism in elementary and high school students: Relationships with learning stress, learning satisfaction and self-reported academic performance level. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 3675–3683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar