Advertisement

Sense of agency is modulated by interactions between action choice, outcome valence, and predictability

  • Takumi TanakaEmail author
  • Hideaki Kawabata
Article
  • 234 Downloads

Abstract

Sense of agency is a feeling of control over one’s actions to cause sensory events in one’s environment. While previous studies investigated the role of action choice and emotional valence of action outcome in forming implicit agency, the results were not consistent and the relationship between these factors remains unclear. We manipulated both action alternatives available and emotional valences of sounds (either positive or negative) as action outcomes and measured the resultant intentional binding effects in two experiments that differed in predictability of outcome valence. When participants could not predict the valence of action outcomes, they showed stronger sense of agency for negative outcomes determined by their free choice (Experiment 1). Conversely, when participants’ actions caused only outcomes with specific valence, this interaction was not observed (Experiment 2). These findings imply that the implicit processes of agency reflect an integrative context-dependent cognition of consequence of action choice, prior to explicit attribution judgments.

Keywords

Sense of agency Intentional binding Action choice Emotional valence Action-outcome predictability 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI [grant no. JP16H01515]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analyses, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All experiments in this study were approved by the local ethical committee of the Keio University, Japan.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study with a written consent form.

References

  1. Barlas, Z., & Obhi, S. (2013). Freedom, choice, and the sense of agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 514.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00514.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Barlas, Z., Hockley, W. E., & Obhi, S. S. (2017). The effects of freedom of choice in action selection on perceived mental effort and the sense of agency. Acta Psychologica, 180, 122–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.09.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlas, Z., Hockley, W. E., & Obhi, S. S. (2018). Effects of free choice and outcome valence on the sense of agency: Evidence from measures of intentional binding and feelings of control. Experimental Brain Research, 236(1), 129–139.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5112-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, B., Di Costa, S., & Haggard, P. (2017). Having control over the external world increases the implicit sense of agency. Cognition, 162, 54–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blakemore, S. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (1998). Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 635–640.  https://doi.org/10.1038/2870.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Borhani, K., Beck, B., & Haggard, P. (2017). Choosing, doing, and controlling: Implicit sense of agency over somatosensory events. Psychological Science, 28(7), 882–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bossuyt, E., Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2014). Exploring the relations between regret, self-agency, and the tendency to repair using experimental methods and structural equation modeling. The Psychological Record, 64(4), 841–857.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0065-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2007). International Affective Digitized Sounds (2nd edn.): Affective ratings of Sounds and Instruction Manual (Technical Report No. B-3). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention.Google Scholar
  9. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 443–446.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897x00357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buehner, M. J. (2012). Understanding the past, predicting the future. Causation, not intentional action, is the root of temporal binding. Psychological Science, 23(12), 1490–1497.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612444612.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Caspar, E. A., Christensen, J. F., Cleeremans, A., & Haggard, P. (2016). Coercion changes the sense of agency in the human brain. Current Biology, 26(5), 585–592.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.067.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Caspar, E. A., Vuillaume, L., Magalhães De Saldanha da Gama, P. A., & Cleeremans, A. (2017). The influence of (dis)belief in free will on immoral behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 20.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00020.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Christensen, J. F., Yoshie, M., Di Costa, S., & Haggard, P. (2016). Emotional valence, sense of agency and responsibility: A study using intentional binding. Consciousness and Cognition, 43, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.02.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cravo, A. M., Claessens, P. M., & Baldo, M. V. (2009). Voluntary action and causality in temporal binding. Experimental Brain Research, 199(1), 95–99.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1969-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Desantis, A., Roussel, C., & Waszak, F. (2011). On the influence of causal beliefs on the feeling of agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1211–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Di Costa, S., Théro, H., Chambon, V., & Haggard, P. (2017). Try and try again: Post-error boost of an implicit measure of agency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1350871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frith, C. D. (2014). Action, agency and responsibility. Neuropsychologia, 55, 137–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gallagher, I. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 14–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gentsch, A., & Synofzik, M. (2014). Affective coding: The emotional dimension of agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 608.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00608.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Gentsch, A., Weiss, C., Spengler, S., Synofzik, M., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2015). Doing good or bad: How interactions between action and emotion expectations shape the sense of agency. Social Neuroscience, 10(4), 418–430.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2015.1006374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Haggard, P., & Chambon, V. (2012). Sense of agency. Current Biology, 22(10), R390–R392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.040.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Haggard, P., Clark, S., & Kalogeras, J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5(4), 382–385.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn827.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Karsh, N., & Eitam, B. (2015). I control therefore I do: Judgments of agency influence action selection. Cognition, 138, 122–131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.002.
  24. Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., Pelli, D., Ingling, A., Murray, R., & Broussard, C. (2007). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3. Perception, 36(14), 1.Google Scholar
  25. Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311.
  26. Lepron, E., Causse, M., & Farrer, C. (2015). Responsibility and the sense of agency enhance empathy for pain. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 282(1799), 20142288.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Libet, B., Gleason, C. A., Wright, E. W., & Pearl, D. K. (1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readi-ness-potential)—The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain, 106, 623–642.  https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/106.3.623.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 711–747.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mistry, P., & Liljeholm, M. (2016). Instrumental divergence and the value of control. Scientific Reports, 6, 36295.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36295.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Moore, J., & Haggard, P. (2008). Awareness of action: Inference and prediction. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 136–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2006.12.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Moore, J. W., & Obhi, S. S. (2012). Intentional binding and the sense of agency: A review. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 546–561.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Moore, J. W., Ruge, D., Wenke, D., Rothwell, J., & Haggard, P. (2010). Disrupting the experience of control in the human brain: Presupplementary motor area contributes to the sense of agency. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B: Biological Sciences, 277, 2503–2509.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0404.
  34. Moreton, J., Callan, M. J., & Hughes, G. (2017). How much does emotional valence of action outcomes affect temporal binding? Consciousness and Cognition, 49, 25–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.12.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Moretto, G., Walsh, E., & Haggard, P. (2011). Experience of agency and sense of responsibility. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1847–1854.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Obhi, S. S., & Hall, P. (2011). Sense of agency and intentional binding in joint action. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 655–662.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2675-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 437–442.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897x00366.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pfister, R., Obhi, S. S., Rieger, M., & Wenke, D. (2014). Action and perception in social contexts: Intentional binding for social action effects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 667.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00667.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Rizley, R. (1978). Depression and distortion in the attribution of causality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(1), 32–48.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843x.87.1.32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Seligman, M. E. P. (1968). Chronic fear produced by unpredictable electric shock. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 66(2), 402–411.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026355.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., & Newen, A. (2008). Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 219–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.010.
  42. Takahata, K., Takahashi, H., Maeda, T., Umeda, S., Suhara, T., Mimura, M., & Kato, M. (2012). It’s not my fault: Postdictive modulation of intentional binding by monetary gains and losses. PLoS One, 7(12), e53421.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053421.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Wolpe, N., Haggard, P., Siebner, H. R., & Rowe, J. B. (2013). Cue integration and the perception of action in intentional binding. Experimental Brain Research, 229(3), 467–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Woolfolk, R. L., Doris, J. M., & Darley, J. M. (2006). Identification, situational constraint, and social cognition: Studies in the attribution of moral responsibility. Cognition, 100(2), 283–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Yoshie, M., & Haggard, P. (2013). Negative emotional outcomes attenuate sense of agency over voluntary actions. Current Biology, 23(20), 2028–2032.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.034.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Yoshie, M., & Haggard, P. (2017). Effects of emotional valence on sense of agency require a predictive model. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 8733.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08803-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Human RelationsKeio UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyKeio UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations