Why and when paradoxical leader behavior impact employee creativity: Thriving at work and psychological safety
- 124 Downloads
Why and when does paradoxical leader behavior lead to an increase in employee creativity and thriving at work? Based on self-determination theory, we propose that paradoxical leader behavior enhances employee creativity by increasing employees’ thriving at work. We also propose that psychological safety moderates the positive effect of thriving at work on employee creativity. Survey data from 139 supervisor-employee dyads in four Chinese enterprises indicates that paradoxical leader behavior has positive effects on employee creativity via the mediating effect of thriving at work. The results also show that psychological safety strengthens the positive relationship between thriving at work and employee creativity. This positive relationship will be stronger when there are higher levels of psychological safety. Our study supports the self-determination perspective in understanding paradoxical leader behavior, and also strengthens the application of this perspective in understanding paradoxical leader behavior and employee creativity.
KeywordsParadoxical leader behavior; thriving at work Psychological safety Employee creativity
This paper is supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Numbers: 71372089).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.Google Scholar
- Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-Mcintyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 618–630.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression‐Based Approach. New York: The Guilford PressGoogle Scholar
- Hui, H. C. C., & Tan, C. K. (1995). Employee motivation and attitudes in the Chinese workforce. The handbook of Chinese psychology, p. 364–378Google Scholar
- Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.Google Scholar
- Ning, L., & Jin, Y. (2007). The mechanism of how trust climate impacts on individual performance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39(6), 1111–1121.Google Scholar
- Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.Google Scholar
- Quinn, R. W. (2007). Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation. In J. E. Dutton, & B. R. Ragins (Eds.), Energizing others in work connections. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. 73–90.Google Scholar
- Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations 7th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696.Google Scholar