The relationship between interpersonal responsibility and interpersonal trust: A longitudinal study
- 199 Downloads
Although the relationship between personality and interpersonal trust has been supported, the longitudinal effect of personality on interpersonal trust (especially the unique effects of indigenous Chinese personality traits) has been ignored by prior studies. The present study explored the longitudinal relationship between interpersonal responsibility (an indigenous Chinese interpersonal trait) and interpersonal trust among 1882 undergraduate students over a 6-month interval. Latent structural equation modelling showed that interpersonal responsibility predicted interpersonal trust 6 months later, and the path coefficient from interpersonal trust to interpersonal responsibility was marginally significant. Additionally, the results of hierarchical linear regression analyses showed that after controlling for the Big Five personality traits, interpersonal responsibility predicted interpersonal trust at the same time and over time. These results suggest that interpersonal responsibility may have a unique effect on interpersonal trust that is independent of the effects of the Big Five traits, thus extending the research regarding the relationship between personality and interpersonal trust.
KeywordsInterpersonal responsibility Interpersonal trust Big five traits Longitudinal analysis
This manuscript was supported by a Grant Project of the Human Social Science Research Program of the Ministry of Education (14YJA190011) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SWU1509107).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
Author A declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. Author B declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.
- Cheung, F. M., Zhang, J. X., & Cheung, S. F. (2010). From indigenous to cross-cultural personality: The case of the Chinese personality assessment inventory. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 295–308). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S. F., & Fan, W. (2013). From Chinese to cross-cultural personality assessment: A combined emic–etic approach to study personality in culture. In M. Gelfand, Y. Y. Hong, & C. Y. Chiu (Eds.), Advances in culture and psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 117–180). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R: The revised NEO Personality Inventory. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Cuperman, R., & Ickes, W. (2009). Big five predictors of behavior and perceptions in initial dyadic interactions: Personality similarity helps extraverts and introverts, but hurts “disagreeables”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(4), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015741.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fang, X. P., & Liu, J. P. (2017). Interpretative bias of positive and negative events in high and low self-supporting undergraduates. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25(4), 709–713. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2017.04.025. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gabrenya, W. K., & Hwang, K. (1996). Chinese social interaction: Harmony and hierarchy on the good earth. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 309–321). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gong, X., Xia, L. X., Sun, Y., Guo, L., Carpenter, V. C., Fang, Y., & Chen, Y. (2017). Proposal allocation ratio as a moderator of interpersonal responsibility effects on hostile decision-making in the ultimatum game. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01959.
- Hiraishi, K., Yamagata, S., Shikishima, C., & Ando, J. (2008). Maintenance of genetic variation in personality through control of mental mechanisms: A test of trust, extraversion, and agreeableness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ledgerwood, A., & Sherman, J. W. (2012). Short, sweet, and problematic? The rise of the short report in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611427304.
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed.) (Vol. 3, pp. 159–180). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., & Wilkowski, B. M. (2006). Turning the other cheek: Agreeableness and the regulation of aggression-related primes. Psychological Science, 17, 136–142.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Rast, P., & Hofer, S. M. (2014). Longitudinal design considerations to optimize power to detect variances and covariances among rates of change: Simulation results based on actual longitudinal studies. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034524.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Timmons, A. C., & Preacher, K. J. (2015). The importance of temporal design: How do measurement intervals affect the accuracy and efficiency of parameter estimates in longitudinal research? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.961056.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xia, L. X. (2010). The law and shaping of self-supporting. Hefei: Anhui Education Press.Google Scholar
- Xia, L. X. (2011). Self-supporting personality and psychosomatic symptoms: The testing of trait-stress-symptom congruence and mediating model. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43, 650–660.Google Scholar
- Xia, L. X., Huang, X. T., Wan, L., & Yang, H. S. (2011a). Self-supporting personality and practical problem solving. Psychological Development and Education, 27, 52–58.Google Scholar
- Yang, K. S. (1995). Chinese social orientation: An integrative analysis. In T. Y. Lin, W. S. Tseng, & E. K. Yeh (Eds.), Chinese societies and mental health (pp. 19–39). Hong Kong, China: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Yang, K. S. (2004). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the Chinese self from the perspective of social and individual orientation. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 22, 11–80.Google Scholar
- Yang, J., McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., Dai, X., Yao, S., Cai, T., & Gao, B. (1999). Cross-cultural personality assessment in psychiatric populations: The NEO-PI—R in the People's Republic of China. Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-35184.108.40.2069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, R. R., Xiang, X. L., & Yong, C. (2014). The relationship between interpersonal self-support traits and depression among undergraduate students: The mediating role of interpersonal coping. Psychological Development and Education, 30, 193–199.Google Scholar