Advertisement

Current Psychology

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 563–571 | Cite as

Indirect Effects of Fluid Intelligence on Creative Aptitude Through Openness to Experience

  • Xiqin Liu
  • Ling Liu
  • Zhencai Chen
  • Yiying SongEmail author
  • Jia Liu
Article

Abstract

The intelligence-creativity relationship has been extensively investigated. While previous studies mainly focused on the relationship between intelligence and creative achievement or creative process, the present study examined the relationship between intelligence and creative aptitude. We measured participants’ creative aptitude with the Williams Creative Aptitude Test and fluid intelligence (i.e., Gf) with the Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices. We found that Gf was positively correlated with creative aptitude of curiosity and imagination. Further analyses showed that Gf has an indirect effect on creative aptitude of curiosity and imagination through the personality of Openness to Experience measured by the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. These results suggest that Openness to Experience plays a critical role in the process through which Gf may influence creative aptitude.

Keywords

Creative aptitude Fluid intelligence Personality Openness to experience Indirect effect 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31230031), the National Basic Research Program of China (2014CB846101), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91132703 and 31471067). We wish to thank members in Liu Lab for their help in data collection.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Andrews, E. G. (1930). The development of imagination in the pre-school child. University of Iowa Studies in Character, 3(4), 64.Google Scholar
  2. Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 478–485.Google Scholar
  3. Barron, F. (1963). Creativity and psychological health: Origins of personality and creative freedom. Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  4. Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355–429.Google Scholar
  5. Batey, M., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2009). Intelligence and personality as predictors of divergent thinking: The role of general, fluid and crystallised intelligence. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(1), 60–69.Google Scholar
  6. Batey, M., Furnham, A., & Safiullina, X. (2010). Intelligence, general knowledge and personality as predictors of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 532–535.Google Scholar
  7. Benedek, M., Franz, F., Heene, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 480–485.Google Scholar
  8. Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73–83.Google Scholar
  9. Cai, X., & Zhu, Y. (2007). The correlation of adolescent’s creative inclination, intelligence and academic achievement. Psychological Development and Education, 23(2), 36–41.Google Scholar
  10. Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 499.Google Scholar
  11. Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37–50.Google Scholar
  12. Chan, K. W. (2005). Creative teaching and Learning. Hong Kong: Infolink Publishing Ltd..Google Scholar
  13. Claxton, A. F., Pannells, T. C., & Rhoads, P. A. (2005). Developmental trends in the creativity of school-age children. Creativity Research Journal, 17(4), 327–335.Google Scholar
  14. Costa Jr., P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources, Professional Manual.Google Scholar
  15. Da Costa, S., Páez, D., Sánchez, F., Garaigordobil, M., & Gondim, S. (2015). Personal factors of creativity: A second order meta-analysis. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(3), 165–173.Google Scholar
  16. DeYoung, C. G. (2014). Openness/intellect: A dimension of personality reflecting cognitive exploration. In M. L. Cooper & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Personality processes and individual differences (Vol. 4, pp. 369–399). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  17. DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Sources of openness/intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 825–858.Google Scholar
  18. DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880.Google Scholar
  19. DeYoung, C. G., Hirsh, J. B., Shane, M. S., Papademetris, X., Rajeevan, N., & Gray, J. R. (2010). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience brain structure and the big five. Psychological Science, 21(6), 820–828.Google Scholar
  20. Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity (Vol. 12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.Google Scholar
  22. Fiedler, K., Schott, M., & Meiser, T. (2011). What mediation analysis can (not) do. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1231–1236.Google Scholar
  23. Furnham, A., & Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 613–617.Google Scholar
  24. Furnham, A., Batey, M., Anand, K., & Manfield, J. (2008). Personality, hypomania, intelligence and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(5), 1060–1069.Google Scholar
  25. George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513.Google Scholar
  26. Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the adjective check list[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1398.Google Scholar
  27. Gray, J. R., Chabris, C. F., & Braver, T. S. (2003). Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nature Neuroscience, 6(3), 316–322.Google Scholar
  28. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  29. Harris, J. A. (2004). Measured intelligence, achievement, openness to experience, and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(4), 913–929.Google Scholar
  30. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41(4), 212–221.Google Scholar
  32. Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. Euroupean Jounal of Personality, 28(1), 95–105.Google Scholar
  33. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  34. Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment (Vol. 53). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Kaufman, J. C., Pumaccahua, T. T., & Holt, R. E. (2013). Personality and creativity in realistic, investigative, artistic, social, and enterprising college majors. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(8), 913–917.Google Scholar
  36. Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B., & DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 82, 248–258.Google Scholar
  37. Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Prufrock Journal, 16(2–3), 57–66.Google Scholar
  38. Kim, K. H. (2006). Meta-analyses of the relationship of creative achievement to both IQ and divergent thinking test scores. Journal Of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 106–130.Google Scholar
  39. Kim, H., Cramond, B., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (2010). The relationship between creativity and intelligence. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 395–412). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kong, F., Ding, K., Yang, Z., Dang, X., Hu, S., Song, Y., & Liu, J. (2015). Examining gray matter structures associated with individual differences in global life satisfaction in a large sample of young adults. Social Cogntive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(7), 952–960.Google Scholar
  42. Langevin, R. L. (1971). Is curiosity a unitary construct? Canadian Journal of Psychology, 25, 360–374.Google Scholar
  43. Li, J., Tian, M., Fang, H., Xu, M., Li, H., & Liu, J. (2010). Extraversion predicts individual differences in face recognition. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 3(4), 295–298.Google Scholar
  44. Li, W., Li, X., Huang, L., Kong, X., Yang, W., Wei, D., et al. (2015). Brain structure links trait creativity to openness to experience. Social Cogntive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(2), 191–198.Google Scholar
  45. Lin, C., & Wang, M. (1994). The creativity assessment Packet. Taipei: Psychological Publishing.Google Scholar
  46. MacKinnon, D. W. (1961). Fostering creativity in students of engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 52, 129–142.Google Scholar
  47. MacKinnon, D. W. (1978). Educating for creativity: A modern myth. In: G. A. Davis & J. A. Scott (Eds.), Training creative thinking (pp. 194–207). Melbourne: Krieger.Google Scholar
  48. McCloy, W., & Meier, N. C. (1931). Re-creative imagination. Psychological Monographs, 51, 108–116.Google Scholar
  49. McCrae, R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 826–848). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  50. McCrae, R. R., Arenberg, D., & Costa Jr., P. T. (1987). Declines in divergent thinking with age: Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and cross-sequential analyses. Psychology and Aging, 2, 130–137.Google Scholar
  51. Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2–3), 107–120.Google Scholar
  52. Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27.Google Scholar
  53. Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39(1), 36–45.Google Scholar
  54. Pearlman, C. (1983). Teachers as an informational resource in identifying and rating student creativity. Education, 103(3), 215–222.Google Scholar
  55. Peterson, J. B., Smith, K. W., & Carson, S. (2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: Replication and commentary. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(7), 1137–1147.Google Scholar
  56. Piffer, D. (2012). Can creativity be measured? An attempt to clarify the notion of creativity and general directions for future research. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), 258–264.Google Scholar
  57. Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96.Google Scholar
  58. Plucker, J. A., Esping, A., Kaufman, J. C., & Avitia, M. J. (2015). Creativity and intelligence. In Handbook of intelligence (pp. 283–291). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  59. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.Google Scholar
  60. Preckel, F., Holling, H., & Wiese, M. (2006). Relationship of intelligence and creativity in gifted and non-gifted students: An investigation of threshold theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(1), 159–170.Google Scholar
  61. Raine, A., Reynolds, C., Venables, P. H., & Mednick, S. A. (2002). Stimulation seeking and intelligence: A prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 663.Google Scholar
  62. Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  63. Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.Google Scholar
  64. Runco, M. A. (1986). Divergent thinking and creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 375–384.Google Scholar
  65. Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1986). The threshold theory regarding creativity and intelligence: An empirical test with gifted and nongifted children. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 11(4), 212–218.Google Scholar
  66. Silvia, P. J. (2008). Another look at creativity and intelligence: Exploring higher-order models and probable confounds. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(4), 1012–1021.Google Scholar
  67. Silvia, P. J., & Sanders, C. E. (2010). Why are smart people curious? Fluid intelligence, openness to experience, and interest. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 242–245.Google Scholar
  68. Song, Y., Lu, H., Hu, S., Xu, M., Li, X., & Liu, J. (2014). Regulating emotion to improve physical health through the amygdala. Social Cogntive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(4), 523–530.Google Scholar
  69. Song, Y., Zhu, Q., Li, J., Wang, X., & Liu, J. (2015). Typical and atypical development of functional connectivity in the face network. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(43), 14624–14635.Google Scholar
  70. Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 311–322.Google Scholar
  71. Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Sutin, A. R., Beason-Held, L. L., Resnick, S. M., & Costa, P. T. (2009). Sex differences in resting-state neural correlates of openness to experience among older adults. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2797–2802.Google Scholar
  73. Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Directions manual and scoring. Princeton: Personnel Press.Google Scholar
  74. Torrance, E. P. (1969). Prediction of adult creative achievement among high school seniors. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 13, 223–229.Google Scholar
  75. Walker, B. R., & Jackson, C. J. (2014). How the five factor model and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory predict divergent thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 57, 54–58.Google Scholar
  76. Williams, F. E. (1969). Models for encouraging creativity in the classroom by integrating cognitive-affective behaviors. Educational Technology, 9(12), 7–13.Google Scholar
  77. Williams, F. E. (1980). Creativity assessment Packet (CAP): Manual. New York: DOK Publishers.Google Scholar
  78. Williams, F. E. (1993). Creativity assessment Packet Examiner’s manual. Austin: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  79. Yang, J., McCrae, R. R., Costa Jr., P. T., Dai, X., Yao, S., Cai, T., & Gao, B. (1999). Cross-cultural personality assessment in psychiatric populations: The NEO-PI—R in the People's Republic of China. Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 359.Google Scholar
  80. Zhang, L., Liu, L., Li, X., Song, Y., & Liu, J. (2015). Serotonin transporter gene polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) influences trait anxiety by modulating the functional connectivity between the amygdala and insula in Han Chinese males. Human Brain Mapping, 36(7), 2732–2742.Google Scholar
  81. Zhu, B., Chen, C., Dang, X., Dong, Q., & Lin, C. (2017). Hippocampal subfields' volumes are more relevant to fluid intelligence than verbal working memory. Intelligence, 61, 169–175.Google Scholar
  82. Ziegler, M., Danay, E., Heene, M., Asendorpf, J., & Bühner, M. (2012). Openness, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(2), 173–183.Google Scholar
  83. Zimprich, D., Allemand, M., & Dellenbach, M. (2009). Openness to experience, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence in middle-aged and old adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 444–454.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiqin Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ling Liu
    • 3
  • Zhencai Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yiying Song
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jia Liu
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain ResearchBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Center for Collaboration and Innovation in Brain and Learning SciencesBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Department of Psychology & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain ResearchPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  4. 4.School of PsychologyBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations