Advertisement

Current Psychology

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 497–503 | Cite as

Grandiose Narcissists’ Public Versus Private Attributions for a Collaborative Success

  • Kendra Selle
  • Ashley A. BrownEmail author
  • Amani El-Alayli
  • Sandra Ewert
Article

Abstract

Grandiose narcissists tend to exhibit stronger self-serving attributional biases (SSABs) and seek public recognition for accomplishments. We examined whether grandiose narcissists are especially self-serving regarding a team success when making attributions publicly versus privately, and whether this depends on whether their partner is a friend or stranger. College students imagined winning a contest involving collaboration with a partner (friend/stranger), and then distributed credit and monetary reward for the team’s success in an imagined public (“TV interview”) or private (“anonymous survey”) context. Participants higher in grandiose narcissism exhibited greater SSAB when partnered with a stranger than a friend, especially when making attributions for earned monetary award in a “public” context. In contrast, participants lower in narcissism did not exhibit SSAB in any experiment condition. In fact, they exhibited a partner-favoring bias (in monetary reward allocations) in the “public” context when partnered with a stranger. Implications for real world reward distributions are discussed.

Keywords

Grandiose narcissism Self-serving bias Attribution Public Team 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 56–71. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.36.1.56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, W. K. (1999). Narcissism and romantic attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1254–1270. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, W. K., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 3(1), 23–43. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, W. K., Reeder, G. D., Sedikides, C., & Elliot, A. J. (2000a). Narcissism and comparative self-enhancement strategies. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 329–347. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.2000.2282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, W. K., Sedikides, C., Reeder, G. D., & Elliot, A. J. (2000b). Among friends? An examination of friendship and the self-serving bias. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 229–240. doi: 10.1348/014466600164444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, W. K., Bush, C. P., Brunell, A. B., & Shelton, J. (2005). Understanding the social costs of narcissism: The case of the tragedy of the commons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1358–1368. doi: 10.1177/0146167205274855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. El-Alayli, A., & Wynne, M. (2015). Who has the better personality, me or my partner? Self-enhancement bias in relationships and its potential consequences. Personal Relationships, 22, 550–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Exline, J. J., Single, P. B., Lobel, M., & Geyer, A. L. (2004). Glowing praise and the envious gaze: Social dilemmas surrounding the public recognition of achievement. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 119–130. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp2602&3_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foster, J. D., & Campbell, W. K. (2007). Are there such things as ‘narcissists’ in social psychology? A taxometric analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1321–1332. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hayes, A.F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
  13. John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1994). Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 206–219. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marshall, T. C., Lefringhausen, K., & Ferenczi, N. (2015). The big five, self-esteem, and narcissism as predictors of the topics people write about in Facebook status updates. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller, J. D., & Campbell, W. K. (2008). Comparing clinical and social-personality conceptualizations of narcissism. Journal of Personality, 76(3), 449–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00492.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller, J. D., & Campbell, W. K. (2010). The case for using research on trait narcissism as a building block for understanding narcissistic personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 1, 180–191. doi: 10.1037/a0018229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213–225. doi: 10.1037/h0076486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 177–196. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1204_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Raskin, R. N., & Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1979.45.2.590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sedikides, C., Campbell, W. K., Reeder, G. D., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). The self-serving bias in relational context. Journal or Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 378–386. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stephan, C., Kennedy, J. C., & Aronson, E. (1977). The effects of friendship and outcome on task attribution. Sociometry, 2, 107–112. doi: 10.2307/3033512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stucke, T. S. (2003). Who’s to blame? Narcissism and self-serving attributions following feedback. European Journal of Personality, 17, 465–478. doi: 10.1002/per.497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vaknin, S. (2007). Malignant self-love: Narcissism revisited. Prague: Narcissus Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Wallace, H. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2002). The performance of narcissists rises and falls with perceived opportunity for glory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 819–834. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.5.819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wink, P. (1991). Two faces of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 590–597. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eastern Washington UniversityCheneyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Social PsychologyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations