Advertisement

Current Psychology

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 458–468 | Cite as

Sympathy and Tenderness as Components of Dispositional Empathic Concern: Predicting Helping and Caring Behaviors

  • Belén López-PérezEmail author
  • Pilar Carrera
  • Luis Oceja
  • Tamara Ambrona
  • Eric Stocks
Article

Abstract

Recently, empathic concern was separated into the components of sympathy and tenderness (Lishner et al. 2011). So far, these two emotional experiences have been assessed as episodic emotional responses, as the existent dispositional measures remain blind to such distinction. The aim of the present research is to develop and validate a dispositional measure that captures the personal disposition to feel sympathy, tenderness, and personal distress. This new scale is called Sympathy, Tenderness and Distress Dispositional Scale (SyTeD). In Study 1, we developed and tested the internal consistency and factor structure of the English version of the scale in the United States. In Study 2, we translated the scale into Spanish and tested its content and criterion validity in Spain. In Study 3, we tested the predictive validity of the sympathy-tenderness distinction within a helping vs. a care-based scenario in the United Kingdom (SyTeD-English version). In Study 4, we tested the predictive validity of the sympathy-tenderness distinction in a real helping situation in Spain (SyTeD-Spanish version). The results across these four studies suggest that the SyTeD is a useful measure of dispositional sympathy and tenderness that allows studying further different types of prosocial behavior (i.e., help vs. care).

Keywords

Sympathy Tenderness Personal distress Care Help Questionnaire 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants AP2008-00065 and PSI 2014-53321P from the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sports. We would like to thank Dr. Daniel Batson and Dr. Michaela Gummerum for their helpful comments on an earlier draft.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

This research was funded by grants AP2008–00065 and PSI 2014-53321P from the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sports.

Conflict of Interests

The authors do not have any conflict of interests.

Ethical Approval

The research conducted has obtained ethical approval from the authors’ institution and were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

The different studies have been carried after obtaining informed consent from the participants.

References

  1. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Batson, C. D. (2011). Altruism in Humans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitative distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55, 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Todd, R. M., Brummett, B. H., Shaw, L. L., & Aldeguer, C. M. R. (1995). Empathy and the collective good: Caring for one of the others in a social dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 619–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Batson, C. D., Lishner, D. A., Cook, J., & Sawyer, S. (2005). Similarity and nurturance: Two possible sources of empathy for strangers. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlo, G., Eisenberg, N., Troyer, D., Switzer, G., & Speer, A. L. (1991). The altruistic personality: In what contexts is it apparent? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 450–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coke, J. S., Batson, C. D., & McDavis, K. (1978). Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 752–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 1–9.Google Scholar
  11. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, M. H., Mitchell, K. V., Hall, J. A., Lothert, J., Snapp, T., & Meyer, M. (1999). Empathy, expectations, and situational preferences: Personality influences on the decision to participate in volunteer helping behaviors. Journal of Personality, 67, 469–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, M. H., Hall, J. A., & Meyer, M. (2003). The first year: Influences on the satisfaction, involvement, and persistence of new community volunteers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 248–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dovidio, J. F., Allen, J. L., & Schroeder, D. A. (1990). The specificity of empathy-induced helping: Evidence for altruistic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dymond, R. F. (1949). A scale for the measurement of empathic ability. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 13, 127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1971). Love and hate. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  19. Eisenberg, N., Miller, P. A., Schaller, M., Fabes, R. A., Fultz, J., Shell, R., & Shea, C. L. (1989). The role of sympathy and altruistic personality traits in helping: A reexamination. Journal of Personality, 57, 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferrando, P. J., & Chico, E. (2000). A Spanish version of the Marlowe and Crowne’s social desirability scale. Psicothema, 12, 383–389.Google Scholar
  21. Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Grynberg, D., Heeren, A., & Luminet, O. (2012). Development and validation of the vicarious distress questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 44, 138–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalawski, J. P. (2010). Is tenderness a basic emotion? Motivation and Emotion, 34, 158–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzeg (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 4th ed., pp. 233–265). New York: McGraw-hill.Google Scholar
  26. Lishner, D., Oceja, L. V., Stocks, E., & Zaspel, K. (2008). The effect of infant-like characteristics on empathic concern for adults in need. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lishner, D. A, Batson, C.D. &, Huss E. (2011). Tenderness and sympathy: Distinct empathic emotions elicited by different forms of need. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 614–625.Google Scholar
  28. López-Pérez, B., Sanchez, J., & Parkinson, B. (2017). Perceived effect of other people’s emotion regulation on their vicarious emotional experience. Motivation and Emotion, 41, 113–121.Google Scholar
  29. Lorenz, K. (1971). Studies in animal and human behavior (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. McArdle, J. J. (1990). Principles versus principals of structural factor-analyses. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGrath, M., Cann, S., & Konopasky, R. (1998). New measures of defensiveness, empathy, and cognitive distortions for sexual offenders against children. Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 25–36.Google Scholar
  32. Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40, 525–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Niezink, L. W., Siero, F. W., Dijkstra, P., Buunk, A. P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2012). Empathic concern: Distinguishing between tenderness and sympathy. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 544–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oceja, L. V. (2008). Overcoming empathy-induced partiality: Two rules of thumb. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 176–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oceja, L. V., & Jiménez, I. (2007). Beyond egoism and group identity: Empathy for the other and awareness of others in a social dilemma. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oceja, L. V., López-Pérez, B., Ambrona, T., & Fernández, I. (2009). Measuring general dispositions to feel empathy and distress. Psicothema, 21, 171–176.Google Scholar
  37. Oceja, L. V., Heerdink, M., Stocks, E. L., Ambrona, T., López-Pérez, B., & Salgado, S. (2014). Empathy, awareness of others, and action: How feeling empathy for one-among-others motivates to help the others. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Penner, L. A., Fritzsche, B. A., Craiger, J. P., & Freifeld, T. R. (1995). Measuring the prosocial personality. In J. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 10, pp. 147–163). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Pérez-Albéniz, A., de Paúl, J., Etxebarría, J., Montes, M. P., & Torres, E. (2003). Adaptación del Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) al español. Psicothema, 15, 267–272.Google Scholar
  40. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.Google Scholar
  41. Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293–317). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  42. Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O'Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Belén López-Pérez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pilar Carrera
    • 2
  • Luis Oceja
    • 2
  • Tamara Ambrona
    • 2
  • Eric Stocks
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyLiverpool Hope UniversityLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Universidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain
  3. 3.University of Texas at TylerTylerUSA

Personalised recommendations