Advertisement

Current Psychology

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 204–212 | Cite as

2D:4D, Optimism, and Risk Taking

  • Efrat BarelEmail author
Article

Abstract

Testosterone has been associated with a wide range of behaviors. Digit ratio (2D:4D), a somatic marker of prenatal testosterone, has been associated with risk taking, but the findings are inconsistent. The present study sought to investigate an interactionist model combining biological and personality factors in explaining risk taking. Power has been previously found to moderate the relationship between 2D:4D and risk taking. It has also been suggested that optimism plays a mediating role in the relationship between power and risk taking. In light of these interconnections, the present study explored the interaction between 2D:4D and optimism as a predictor of self-reported risk taking. Two hundred and eleven participants (102 men and 109 women) completed self-report measures of optimism and risk taking, and their prenatal testosterone was estimated by left and right 2D:4D ratios. Moderated regression analysis showed that optimism moderated the association between left 2D:4D and general risk taking, with men and women taking more risk with lower 2D:4D and lower optimism levels. Further moderated regression analysis, including participants’ sex, revealed that optimism moderated the association between right 2D:4D and financial risk taking, but only in women, exhibiting more financial risk taking with lower 2D:4D but higher optimism levels.

Keywords

Risk taking Testosterone 2D:4D Optimism 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interests

Efrat Barel has no conflict of interest in the conduct and reporting of the research.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the institutional review boards (IRBs) of the Max Stern Academic College of Emek Yezreel. "All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards".

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

The present manuscript has not been previously published or simultaneously submitted elsewhere.

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apicella, C. L., Dreber, A., Campbell, B., Gray, P. B., Hoffman, M., & Little, A. C. (2008). Testosterone and financial risk preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 384–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Branãs-Garza, P., & Rustichini, A. (2011). Organizing effects of testosterone and economic behavior: Not just risk taking. PloS One, 6, e29842.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brookes, H., Neave, N., Hamilton, C., & Fink, B. (2007). Digit ratio (2D:4D) and lateralization for numerical quantification. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burke, K. L., Joyner, A. B., Czech, D. R., & Wilson, M. J. (2000). An investigation of concurrent validity between two optimism/pessimism questionnaires: The life orientation test-revised and the optimism/pessimism scale. Current Psychology, 19, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, B. C., Dreber, A., Apicella, C. L., Eisenberg, D. T. A., Gray, P. B., Little, A. C., Garcia, J. R., Zamore, R. S., & Lum, J. K. (2010). Testosterone exposure, dopaminergic reward, and sensation-seeking in young men. Physiology & Behavior, 99, 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang, E. C., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & D’Zurilla, T. J. (1997). Optimism and pessimism as partially independent constructs: Relationship to positive and negative affectivity and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 433–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83, 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coates, J. M., & Herbert, J. (2008). Endogenous steroids and financial risk taking on a London trading floor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in the United States of America, 105, 6167–6172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coates, J. M., Gurnell, M., & Rustichini, A. (2009). Second-to-fourth-digit ratio predicts success among high frequency financial traders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 623–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coates, J. M., Gurnell, M., & Sarnyai, Z. (2010). From molecule to market: Steroid hormones and financial risk-taking. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 365, 331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cueva, C., Roberts, R. E., Spencer, T., Rani, N., Tempest, M., Tobler, P. N., Herbert, J., & Rustichini, A. (2015). Cortisol and testosterone increase financial risk taking and may destabilize markets. Scientific Reports, 5, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Derntl, B., Pintzinger, N., Kryspin-Exner, I., & Schöpf, V. (2014). The impact of sex hormone concentrations on decision-making in females and males. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral con-sequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9, 522–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dreber, A., & Hoffman, M. (2007). Risk preferences are partly predetermined. Mimeo: Stockholm School of Economics.Google Scholar
  18. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evans, K. L., & Hampson, E. (2014). Does risk-taking mediate the relationship between testosterone and decision-making on the Iowa gambling task? Personality and Individual Differences, 61, 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–165). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  21. Geschwind, N., & Behan, P. (1982). Left-handedness: Association with immune disease, migraine and developmental learning disorder. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 79, 5097–5100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1987). Cerebral lateralization. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Goudriaan, A. E., Lapauw, B., Ruige, J., Feyen, E., Kaufman, J. M., Brand, M., & Vingerhoets, G. (2010). The influence of high-normal testosterone levels on risk-taking in healthy males in a 1-week letrozole administration study. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35, 1416–1421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderations, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hönekopp, J. (2011). Relationships between digit ratio 2D:4D and self-reported aggression and risk taking in an online study. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jibeen, T. (2014). Personality traits and subjective well-being: Moderating role of optimism in university employees. Social Indicators Research, 118, 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson, D. D. P., McDermott, R., Barrett, E. S., Cowden, J., Wrangham, R., Mclntyre, M. H., & Rosen, S. P. (2006). Overconfidence in wargames: Experimental evidence on expectations, aggression, gender and testosterone. Procedings of the Royal Society – B, 273, 2513–2520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kandasamy, N., Hardy, B., Page, L., Schaffner, M., Graggaber, J., Powlson, A. S., Fletcher, P. C., Gurnell, M., & Coates, J. (2014). Cortisol shifts financial risk preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 3608–3613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kemper, C. J., & Schwerdtfeger, A. (2008). Comparing different methods of digit ratio (2D:4D) measurement. American Journal of Human Biology, 21, 188–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim, Y., Kim, K., & Kim, T. H. (2014). Domain specific relationships of 2D:4D digit ratio in risk perception and risk behavior. The Journal of General Psychology, 141, 373–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lutchmaya, S., Baron-Cohen, S., Raggatt, P., Knickmeyer, R., & Manning, J. T. (2004). 2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone, and estradiol. Early Human Development, 77, 23–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Butz, D. A., & Peruche, B. M. (2007). Power, risk, and the status quo: Does power promote riskier or more conservative decision-making? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 451–462.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Manning, J. T. (2002). Digit ratio: A pointer to fertility, behavior, and health. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Manning, J. T. (2011). Resolving the role of prenatal sex steroids in the development of digit ratio. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 16143–16144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mazur, A., & Booth, A. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 353–363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mehta, P. H., Josephs, R. A., (2010) Testosterone and cortisol jointly regulate dominance: Evidence for a dual-hormone hypothesis. Hormones and Behavior, 58(5), 898–906.Google Scholar
  39. Mehta, P. H., Welker, K. M., Zilioli, S., & Carre, J. M. (2015). Testosterone and cortisol jointly modulate risk-taking. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 56, 88–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Millet, K. (2011). An interactionist perspective on the relation between 2D:4D and behavior: An overview of (moderated) relationships between 2D:4D and economic decision making. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 397–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nettle, D. (2004). Adaptive illusions: Optimism, control and human rationality. In D. Evans & P. Cruse (Eds.), Emotion, evolution and rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Nicholls, M. E. R., Orr, C. A., Yates, M., & Loftus, A. M. (2008). A new means of measuring index/ring finger (2D:4D) ratio and its association with gender and hand preference. Laterality, 13, 71–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oliveira, R. (2004). Social modulation of androgens in vertebrates: Mechanisms and function. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 34, 165–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ortner, G. R., Wibral, M., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Klingmüller, D., Falk, A., & Weber, B. (2013). No evidence for an effect of testosterone administration on delay discounting in male university students. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38, 1814–1818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pietruska, K., & Armony, J. L. (2013). Differential effects of trait anger on optimism and risk behavior. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 318–325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Powell, M., & Ansic, D. (1997). Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(605), 628.Google Scholar
  47. Reavis, R., & Overman, W. H. (2001). Adult sex differences on a decision-making taskpreviously shown to depend on the orbital prefrontal cortex. Behavioral Neuroscience, 115, 196–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Robertson, J., Zhang, W., Liu, J. J., Muir, K. R., Maciewicz, R. A., & Doherty, M. (2008). Radiographic assessment of the index to ring finger ratio (2D:4D) in adults. Journal of Anatomy, 212, 42–48.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Ronay, R., & von Hippel, W. (2010). Power, testosterone, and risk-taking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 473–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rosenblitt, J. C., Soler, H., Johnson, S. E., & Quadagno, D. M. (2001). Sensation seeking and hormones in men and women: Exploring the link. Hormones and Behavior, 40, 396–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rosvall, K. A., Burns, C. B., Barske, J., Goodson, J. L., Schlinger, B. A., Sengelaub, D. R., & Ketterson, E. D. (2012). Neural sensitivity to sex steroids predicts individual differences in aggression: Implications for behavioural evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 3547–3555.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., & Maestripieri, D. (2009). Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in the United States of America, 106, 15268–15273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Slovic, P. (1972). Information procession, situation specificity, and the generality of risk-taking behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 128–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stanton, S. J., Liening, S. H., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2011a). Testosterone is positively associated with risk taking in the Iowa gambling task. Hormones and Behavior, 59, 252–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stanton, S. J., O’Dhaniel, A., McLaurin, R. E., Kuhn, C. M., LaBar, K. S., Platt, M. L., & Huettel, S. A. (2011b). Low-and high-testosterone individuals exhibit decreased aversion to economic risk. Psychological Science, 22, 447–453.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stinerock, R., Stern, B., & Solomon, M. (1991). Sex and money: Gender differences in the use of surrogate consumers for financial decision making. Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 7, 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tiger, L. (1979). Optimism: The biology of hope. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  58. Trivers, R. L. (2000). The elements of a scientific theory of self deception. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 907, 114–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Van Honk, J., Schutter, D. J., Hermans, E. J., Putman, P., Tuiten, A., & Koppeschaar, H. (2004). Testosterone shifts the balance between sensitivity for punishment and reward in healthy young women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 937–943.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vermeersch, H., T'sjoen, G., Kaufman, J. M., & Vincke, J. (2008). The role of testosteronein aggressive and non-aggressive risk-taking in adolescent boys. Hormones and Behavior, 53, 463–471.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. White, R. E., Thornhill, S., & Hampson, E. (2006). Entrepreneurs and evolutionary biology: The relationship between testosterone and new venture creation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zethraeus, N., Kocoska-Maras, L., Ellingsen, T., von Schoultz, B., Hirschberg, A. L., & Johannesson, M. (2009). A randomized trial of the effect of estrogen and testosterone on economic behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 6535–6538.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zuckerman, M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (2000). Personality and risk-taking: Common biosocial factors. Journal of Personality, 68, 999–1028.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe Max Stern Academic College of Emek YezreelYezreel ValleyIsrael

Personalised recommendations