Advertisement

Current Psychology

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 100–109 | Cite as

Exploring the Dark Side of Personality: Emotional Awareness, Empathy, and the Dark Triad Traits in an Italian Sample

  • Adriano SchimmentiEmail author
  • Peter K. Jonason
  • Alessia Passanisi
  • Luana La Marca
  • Nunzia Di Dio
  • Alessia M. Gervasi
Article

Abstract

The Dark Triad represents a collection of three socially aversive traits, namely Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism. In this study, we examined the psychometric properties of the Italian translation of the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen (DTDD) in a sample of 799 adults, and we explored the associations among Dark Triad traits, theory of mind, empathy, and alexithymia. The DTDD showed a good internal consistency and a bifactor structure including a three-factor non-hierarchical model and a global, second-order factor with all of the DTDD items loading on it. The DTDD traits were positively associated with alexithymia and negatively associated with theory of mind and empathy. Also, results of regression analyses showed that difficulty identifying feelings and a reduced emotional reactivity were significant predictors of the Dark Triad traits. Our findings support the validity and reliability of the Italian translation of the DTDD, and suggest that individuals with high levels of Dark Triad traits may have difficulties in understanding and processing their own rather than other people’s emotional states.

Keywords

Dark triad Empathy Alexithymia Theory of mind Dark triad dirty dozen 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ali, F., Amorim, I. S., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Empathy deficits and trait emotional intelligence in psychopathy and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(7), 758–762.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, E. J., Farrelly, D., Black, C., & Moore, H. (2007). Emotional intelligence, Machiavellianism, and emotional manipulation: Does EI have a dark side? Personality and Individual Differences, 43(1), 179–189.Google Scholar
  3. Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D. A., & Taylor, G. J. (1994a). The twenty-item Toronto alexithymia scale-I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38(1), 23–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagby, R. M., Taylor, G. J., & Parker, J. D. (1994b). The twenty-item Toronto alexithymia scale-II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38(1), 33–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron-Cohen, S. (2012). The science of evil: On empathy and the origins of cruelty. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind"? Cognition, 21(1), 37–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Roste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “reading the mind in the eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251.Google Scholar
  8. Baskin-Sommers, A., Krusemark, E., & Ronningstam, E. (2014). Empathy in narcissistic personality disorder: From clinical and empirical perspectives. Personality Disorders, 5(3), 323–333.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Blackburn, R., & Coid, J. W. (1998). Psychopathy and dimensions of personality disorder in violent offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(1), 129–145.Google Scholar
  10. Bressi, C., Taylor, G. J., Parker, J. D. A., Brambilla, V., Aguglia, E., Allegranti, I., (...), & Invernizzi, G. (1996). Cross validation of the factor structure of the twenty-items Toronto alexithymia scale: An Italian multicenter study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 41(6), 551–559.Google Scholar
  11. Briggs, S. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54(1), 106–148.Google Scholar
  12. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.Google Scholar
  13. Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 219–229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Christie, R. (1970). Relationships between Machiavellianism and measures of ability, opinion, and personality. In R. Christie & F. L. Geis (Eds.), Studies in Machiavellianism (pp. 35–52). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cleckley, H. C. (1976). The mask of sanity (5th ed.). St. Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
  17. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha: An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104.Google Scholar
  18. Czarna, A. Z., Jonason, P. K., Dufner, M., & Kossowska, M. (2016). The dirty dozen scale: Validation of a Polish version and extension of the nomological net. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 445.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Fehr, B., Samson, D., & Paulhus, D. L. (1992). The construct of Machiavellianism: Twenty years later. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 9, pp. 77–116). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of the self. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gunnthorsdottir, A., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. (2002). Using the Machiavellianism instrument to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(1), 49–66.Google Scholar
  22. Gustafson, S. B., & Ritzer, D. R. (1995). The dark side of normal: A psychopathy-linked pattern called aberrant self-promotion. European Journal of Personality, 9(3), 147–183.Google Scholar
  23. Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare psychopathy checklist-revised (PCL-R). Toronto: Multi-Health System.Google Scholar
  24. Hare, R. D. (1999). Without conscience: The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hare, R. D., Williamson, S. E., & Harpur, T. J. (1988). Psychopathy and language. In T. E. Moffitt & S. A. Mednick (Eds.), Biological contributions to crime causation (pp. 68–92). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhof Systems.Google Scholar
  26. Hart, S. D., & Hare, R. D. (1997). Psychopathy: Assessment and association with criminal conduct. In D. Stoff, J. Breiling, & J. Maser (Eds.), Handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 22–35). New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  27. Hooker, C. I., Verosky, S. C., Germine, L. T., Knight, R. T., & D’Esposito, M. (2008). Mentalizing about emotion and its relationship to empathy. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3(3), 204–217.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Jakobwitz, S., & Egan, V. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(2), 331–339.Google Scholar
  29. James, S., Kavanagh, P. S., Jonason, P. K., Chonodv, J. M., & Scrutton, H. E. (2014). The dark triad, schadenfreude, and sensational interests: Dark personalities, dark emotions, and dark behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 211–216.Google Scholar
  30. Jonason, P. K. (2015). The deceleration and increased cohesion of the dark triad traits over the life course. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 8, 43.Google Scholar
  31. Jonason, P. K., Kaufman, S. B., Webster, G. D., & Geher, G. (2013a). What lies beneath the dark triad dirty dozen: Varied relations with the big five. Individual Differences Research, 11(2), 81–90.Google Scholar
  32. Jonason, P. K., Kavanagh, P., Webster, G. D., & Fitzgerald, D. (2011a). Comparing the measured and latent dark triad: Are three better than one? Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 2(1), 28–44.Google Scholar
  33. Jonason, P. K., Koenig, B. L., & Tost, J. (2010). Living a fast life: The dark triad and life history theory. Human Nature, 21(4), 428–442.Google Scholar
  34. Jonason, P. K., & Krause, L. (2013). The emotional deficits associated with the dark triad traits: Cognitive empathy, affective empathy, and alexithymia. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(5), 532–537.Google Scholar
  35. Jonason, P. K., & Kroll, C. H. (2015). A multidimensional view of the relationship between empathy and the dark triad. Journal of Individual Differences, 36(3), 150–156.Google Scholar
  36. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Czarna, A. (2013b). Quick and dirty: Some psychosocial costs associated with the dark triad in three countries. Evolutionary Psychology, 11(1), 172–185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. D., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The dark triad: Facilitating short-term mating in men. European Journal of Personality, 23(1), 5–18.Google Scholar
  38. Jonason, P. K., & Luévano, V. X. (2013). Walking the thin line between efficiency and accuracy: Validity and structure of the dirty dozen. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(1), 76–81.Google Scholar
  39. Jonason, P. K., Lyons, M., Bethell, E. J., & Ross, R. (2013c). Different routes to limited empathy in the sexes: Examining the links between the dark triad and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(5), 572–576.Google Scholar
  40. Jonason, P. K., & McCain, J. (2012). Using the HEXACO model to test the validity of the dirty dozen measure of the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(7), 935–938.Google Scholar
  41. Jonason, P. K., Slomski, S., & Partyka, J. (2012b). The dark triad at work: How toxic employees get their way. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 449–453.Google Scholar
  42. Jonason, P. K., Strosser, G. L., Kroll, C. H., Duineveld, J. J., & Baruffi, S. A. (2015). Valuing myself over others: The dark triad traits and moral and social values. Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 102–106.Google Scholar
  43. Jonason, P. K., Valentine, K. A., Li, N. P., & Harbeson, C. L. (2011b). Mate-selection and the dark triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy and creating a volatile environment. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(6), 759–763. Google Scholar
  44. Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Jonason, P. K., Webster, G. W., Schmitt, D. P., Li, N. P., & Crysel, L. (2012a). The antihero in popular culture: A life history theory of the dark triad. Review of General Psychology, 16(2), 192–199.Google Scholar
  46. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Different provocations trigger aggression in narcissists and psychopaths. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(1), 12–18.Google Scholar
  47. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  48. Lane, R. D., Hsu, C. H., Locke, D. E. C., Ritenbaugh, C., & Stonnington, C. M. (2015). Role of theory of mind in emotional awareness and alexithymia: Implications for conceptualization and measurement. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 398–405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Lawrence, E. J., Shaw, P., Baker, D., Baron-Cohen, S., & David, A. S. (2004). Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the empathy quotient. Psychological Medicine, 34(5), 911–920.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the five-factor model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1571–1582.Google Scholar
  51. McHoskey, J. W. (1995). Narcissism and Machiavellianism. Psychological Reports, 77(3), 755–759.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. McHoskey, J. W., Worzel, W., & Syzarto, C. (1995). Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 192–210.Google Scholar
  53. Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Toward a taxonomy of dark personalities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(6), 421–426.Google Scholar
  54. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563.Google Scholar
  55. Petrides, K. V., Vernon, P. A., Schermer, J. A., & Veselka, L. (2011). Trait emotional intelligence and the dark triad traits of personality. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 14(1), 35–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Porter, S., Bhanwer, A., Woodworth, M., & Black, P. J. (2013). Soldiers of misfortune: An examination of the dark triad and the experience of schadenfreude. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 64–68.Google Scholar
  57. Preti, A., Vellante, M., Baron-Cohen, S., Zecca, G., Petretto, D. R., & Masala, C. (2011). The empathy quotient: A cross-cultural comparison of the Italian version. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 16(1), 50–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890–902.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Salekin, R. T., Debus, S. A., & Barker, E. D. (2010). Adolescent psychopathy and the five factor model: Domain and facet analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32(4), 501–514.Google Scholar
  60. Schimmenti, A., Passanisi, A., & Caretti, V. (2014a). Interpersonal and affective traits of psychopathy in child sexual abusers: Evidence from a pilot study sample of Italian offenders. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 23(7), 853–860.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Schimmenti, A., Passanisi, A., Pace, U., Manzella, S., Di Carlo, G., & Caretti, V. (2014b). The relationship between attachment and psychopathy: A study with a sample of violent offenders. Current Psychology, 33(3), 256–270.Google Scholar
  62. Tamura, A., Oshio, A., Tanaka, K., Masui, K., & Jonason, P. K. (2015). Development, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of dark triad dirty dozen. Japanese Journal of Personality, 24(1), 26–37.Google Scholar
  63. Taylor, G. J., Bagby, R. M., & Parker, J. D. A. (1997). Disorders of affect regulation: Alexithymia in medical and psychiatric illness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Vellante, M., Baron-Cohen, S., Melis, M., Marrone, M., Petretto, D. R., Masala, C., & Preti, A. (2013). The “reading the mind in the eyes” test: Systematic review of psychometric properties and a validation study in Italy. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 18(4), 326–354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Wai, M., & Tiliopoulos, N. (2012). The affective and cognitive empathic nature of the dark triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(7), 794–799.Google Scholar
  66. Webster, G. D., & Jonason, P. K. (2013). Putting the “IRT” in “dirty”: Item response theory analyses of the dark triad dirty dozen - an efficient measure of narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(2), 302–306.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Human and Social SciencesUKE – Kore University of EnnaEnnaItaly
  2. 2.School of Social Sciences and PsychologyPenrithAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Social SciencesUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations