Advertisement

Russia’s Relations with the European Court of Human Rights in the Aftermath of the Markin Decision: Debating the “Backlash”

  • Galina A. NelaevaEmail author
  • Elena A. Khabarova
  • Natalia V. Sidorova
Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Russia’s relations with the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) since the time of Russia’s accession to the Council of Europe (CoE) have received a lot of attention on the part of academic scholars, practitioners, and media. Research on the ECtHR became especially important in the context of the twentieth anniversary of Russia’s acceptance of ECtHR jurisdiction that coincided with the unprecedented worsening of relations between Russia and the European countries due to the 2014 Crimea annexation. With voices that consistently advocate Russia’s exit from the CoE (and, consequently, withdrawal from the ECtHR jurisdiction), we believe it necessary to examine Russia-ECtHR relations as they are (re)presented in the academic narrative. Drawing mostly on Russian-language sources, we want to highlight the variety of overarching themes and arguments relating to the crisis caused by the 2015 Constitutional Court Decision. We would like to examine various dimensions of this “crisis,” in order to be able to conclude whether Russia’s reaction to the Markin case and cases of non-compliance that followed was indeed part of a broader strategy of “backlash against international courts” we are currently witnessing worldwide. In the conditions when Russia’s exit from the Council of Europe is as likely as ever, the possibility of the “snowball effect” on the part of other member states threatens undermine the very raison d’être of the European human rights protection system.

Keywords

European court of human rights European convention of human rights and fundamental freedoms Backlash 

Notes

References

  1. Apostolova N.N (2011) Priemlemost’ i ispolnenie reshenij Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [Admissibility and enforcement of ECtHR decisions]. Rossijskaya yusticiya 11: 64–67.Google Scholar
  2. Blankenagel A (2016) «Proshchaj, Sovet Evropy!» ili «Sovet Evropy, davaj pogovorim!»? Sravnitel’noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie 6 (115): 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blankenagel A, Levin I.G (2015) V principe nel’zya, no mozhno! Konstitucionnyj Sud Rossii i delo ob obyazatel’nosti reshenij Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka. Sravnitel’noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie 5: 152–162Google Scholar
  4. Bogush G, Padskocimaite A (2019) Case Closed, but what about the Execution of the Judgment? The closure of Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia. EJIL: Talk! https://www.ejiltalk.org/case-closed-but-what-about-the-execution-of-the-judgment-the-closure-of-anchugov-and-gladkov-v-russia/ Accessed 30 October 2019.
  5. Bohle D (2017) Capitalism and Democracy in East Central Europe: a Sequence of Crises. CEU public lecture. 02 December 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFtofqc8OdM. Accessed 02 September 2019.
  6. Bowring B (2013) Law, Rights and Ideology in Russia: Landmarks in the Destiny of a Great Power. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burkov A L (2010) Konvencija o pravah cheloveka v sudah Rossii. Moscow: Wolters Klewer. http://sutyajnik.ru/documents/4679.pdf. Accessed 29 October 2019.
  8. Buzogány A (2017) Illiberal Democracy in Hungary: Authoritarian Diffusion or Domestic Causation? Democratization 24 (7): 1307–1325.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2017.1328676 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Černič JL (2018) Impact of the European Court of Human Rights on the Rule of Law in Central and Eastern Europe. Hague J Rule Law 10: 111–137.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0074-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chikireva I, Nelaeva G (2017) Russia-GRECO Cooperation: Combatting Corruption in the Field of State and Municipal Service. InterEULawEast : journal for the inter-national and Europe-an law, economics and market integrations 4 (1): 69–84. https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=271609. Accessed 02 September 2019.Google Scholar
  11. Colomer J.M (2016) To Democracy through Anocracy, Democracy and Society 13(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
  12. Coyle A (2008) The treatment of prisoners: International standards and case law. Legal and Criminological Psychology 13: 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Creer S (2008) What’s Wrong with the European Convention on Human Rights? Human Rights Quarterly 30: 680–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Brabandere E (2015) Case Comment: Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v the Russian Federation. Complementarity or Conflict? Contrasting the Yukos Case before the European Court of Human Rights and Investment Tribunals. ICSID Review 30 (2): 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Durham C, Ferrari S (eds) (2004). Laws on Religion and the State in Post-Communist Europe. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
  16. Enyedi Z (2018) Democratic Backsliding and Academic Freedom in Hungary. Perspectives on Politics 16 (4): 1067–1074.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718002165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fedoseeva E.S (2016) Problemy implementacii Evropejskoj konvencii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnyh svobod v rossijskuyu pravovuyu sistemu v usloviyah aktivizma [The problems of implementing ECHR into the Russian legal system in the conditions of activism] Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka. Leningradskij yuridicheskij zhurnal 1(43): 257–265.Google Scholar
  18. Filatova В (2016) Pilotnye postanovleniya ESPCH: problemy ispolneniya. EZH-Yurist 23.Google Scholar
  19. Fleig-Goldstein R (2017) The Russian Constitutional Court versus the European Court of Human Rights: How the Strasbourg Court Should Respond to Russia’s Refusal to Execute ECtHR Judgements. Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 56: 175–218.Google Scholar
  20. Fokas E, Richardson J (2017) The European Court of Human Rights and minority religions: messages generated and messages received. Religion, State and Society 45 (3–4): 166–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franck S. D (2005) The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law Through Inconsistent Decisions. Fordham Law Review 73 (4): 1521–1625. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4062&context=flr. Accessed 02 September 2019.Google Scholar
  22. Gal’perin M.L (2018) Rossiya i ESPCH: est’ napryazhenie? Zakon 5: 103–108.Google Scholar
  23. Gushchina N.A, Gluhoedov M.S (2013) Kollizii otdel’nyh postanovlenij Evropejskogo suda p pravam cheloveka i aktov Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii.Sovremennoe Pravo 9: 71–75.Google Scholar
  24. Haas P (1992). Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46 (1): 1–35.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holzhacker R (2013) State-Sponsored Homophobia and the Denial of the Right of Assembly in Central and Eastern Europe: The “Boomerang” and the “Ricochet” between European Organizations and Civil Society to Uphold Human Rights. Law and Policy 35 (1–2): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Human Rights Watch (2009) Russia: Prosecute rights violations in North Caucasus, European Court has issued 104 rulings against Moscow over killings, other attacks. http://www.hrw.org/de/news/2009/06/04/russia-prosecute-rights-violations-north-caucasus. Accessed 29 October 2019.
  27. Issaeva M, Sergeeva I, Suchkova M (2011) Enforcement of the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in Russia: Recent Developments and Current Challenges. SUR. International Journal of Human Rights 8 (15): 67–91. https://sur.conectas.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/sur15-eng-maria-issaeva-irina-sergeeva-and-maria-suchkova.pdf. Accessed 30 October 2019.Google Scholar
  28. Jägers N, Zwaak L (2008) The Russian Federation and Human Rights. How Should the Council of Europe Deal with the Problems Posed by Its Largest Member State? Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 26 (1): 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Janis M (1997) Russia and the ‘Legality’ of Strasbourg Law. European Journal of International Law 8 (1): 93–99. http://www.ejil.org/pdfs/8/1/1427.pdf. Accessed 29 October 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson P (2015) “Homosexual Propaganda” Laws in the Russian Federation: Are They in Violation of the European Convention on Human Rights? Russian Law Journal 3 (2): 37–61.  https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2015-3-2-37-61 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kalinichenko P A (2016) K voprosu o kollizii mezhdu postanovleniyami ESPCH i Konstituciej Rossii v svete pozicij Konstitucionnogo Suda RF. [On the question of collision of ECtHR case-law and Russian Constitution in light of the Constitutional Court position]. Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava 2: 42–48.  https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2016.63.2.042-048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kantur R А (2018) Problemy soblyudeniya Rossiej obyazatel’stv po stat’e 3 Evropejskoj konvencii po pravam cheloveka v otnoshenii zaderzhannyh: praktika ESPCH. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie 2 (26): 62–76  https://doi.org/10.21128/2226-2059-2018-2-62-76 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keller H, Stone Sweet A (eds.) (2008) A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Khagram S, Riker J V and Sikkink K (2002) Restructuring World Politics. Transnational Social Movements, Networks and Norms. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  35. Khudoley K M (2017) Otkaz ot ispolneniya reshenij mezhdunarodnyh sudebnyh organov po zashchite prav i svobod grazhdan [Refusal to implement the decision of the international judiciary on protection of the citizens’ rights and freedoms]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki 38: 463–473. doi:  https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2017-38-463-473
  36. Knyazev S D (2016) Obyazatel’nost’ postanovlenij ESPCH v pravovoj sisteme Rossii (na osnove praktiki Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii) [Mandatory force of ECtHR case-law in the legal system of Russia (on the basis of Russian Constitutional Court practice)] Zhurnal rossijskogo prava 12: 5-17. doi:  https://doi.org/10.12737/22716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kosař D, Šipulová K (2018) The Strasbourg Court Meets Abusive Constitutionalism: Baka v. Hungary and the Rule of Law. Hague J Rule Law 10: 83–110.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-017-0065-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kovalev A A., Ispolinov A S (2011) Delo Markina. Evropejskij sud po pravam cheloveka i Konstitucionnyj sud Rossijskoj Federacii: dialog ili konfrontaciya? [The case of Markin. European Court on Human Rights and Russian Constitutional Court: dialogue or confrontation?] Rossijskoe pravosudie 5: 4–15.Google Scholar
  39. Kovler A (2014) European Convention on Human Rights in Russia. L’Europe en Formation 4 (374): 116–135. https://www.cairn.inforevue-l-europe-en-formation-2014-4-page-116.htm. Accessed 30 October 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Krastev, I (2007) The Strange Death of the Liberal Consensus. Is Central Europe Backsliding? Journal of Democracy 18 (4): 56–63. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/is-east-central-europe-backsliding-the-strange-death-of-the-liberal-consensus/ Accessed 02 September 2019.Google Scholar
  41. Kuwonu, F (2017) ICC: Beyond the threats of withdrawal. Africa Renewal. https://www.un.org/africarenewal/magazine/may-july-2017/icc-beyond-threats-withdrawal. Accessed 02 September 2019.
  42. Kuznecov D A (2017) Ispolnenie reshenij Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka: pravovye osnovy I nekotorye tendencii [Enforcement of the ECtHR decisions: legal basis and certain tendencies]. Sud’ja 12.Google Scholar
  43. Lapaeva V V (2015) Vozmozhnye sposoby vypolneniya resheniya ESPCH po delu «Anchugov i Gladkov protiv Rossii» putem tolkovaniya ch.3 st.32 Konstitucii RF. http://www.igpran.ru/public/publiconsite/LapaevaVV_igpran2015.pdf. Accessed 02 September 2019.
  44. Levitsky S, Way L (2015) The Myth of Democratic Recession. Journal of Democracy 26 (1): 45–58. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-myth-of-democratic-recession/ Accessed 02 September 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lihachev M A (2016) Mesto reshenij Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka v kontekste postanovlenij Konstitucionnogo suda RF 2013 i 2015 gg. i posleduyushchie zakonodatel’nyh izmenenij [ECtHR decisions in the context of Russian Constitutional Court decisionsof 2013 and 2015 and further legislative changes] Rossijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal 2.Google Scholar
  46. Lihter P L (2019) Pravovaya kategoriya «obshchee blago» v interpretacii Konstitucionnogo suda Rossijskoj Federacii [The legal categogy “common good” in the interpretation of Russian Constitutional Court] Lex Russica 4 (149): 78–84.Google Scholar
  47. Lovat H (2018). International Criminal Tribunal Backlash. 12 September 2018. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3253050 Accessed 02 September 2019.
  48. Luehrmann A, Mechkova V, Wilson M (2017) Is democracy on the decline? Not as much as some pundits want you to believe. Washington Post. June 26. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/06/26/is-democracy-on-the-decline-not-as-much-as-some-pundits-want-you-to-believe/?noredirect=on. Accessed 05 September 2019.
  49. Madsen M.R (2016) The Challenging Authority of the European Court of Human Rights: from Cold War Legal Diplomacy to the Brighton Declaration and Backlash. Law and Contemporary Problems 79: 141–178.Google Scholar
  50. Madsen M R, Cebulak P, Wiebusch M (2018) Backlash against international courts: explaining the forms and patterns of resistance to international courts. International Journal of Law in Context 14: 197–220.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552318000034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Makarova О.В (2018) Realizaciya reshenij Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka v kontekste razvitiya ugolovno-processual’nogo zakonodatel’stva [Implementation of the Judgements of the European Court of Human Right in the Context Criminal Procedural Law Development]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava 6 (8): 124–134.Google Scholar
  52. Malfliet K, Parmentier S (eds.) (2010), Russia and the Council of Europe: 10 Years After, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  53. Mälksoo L (2012) Concluding Observations. Russia and European Human-Rights Law: Margins of the Margin of Appreciation. Review of Central and East European Law 37: 359–369.  https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004203310_009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mälksoo L (2014) F.F. Martens and His Time: When Russia Was an Integral Part of the European Tradition of International Law,” The European Journal of International Law 25 (3): 811–829.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chu054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mälksoo L (2015) Russian Approaches to International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mälksoo L (2017) Introduction. Russia, Strasbourg, and the Paradox of a Human Rights Backlash. In Mälksoo L., Benedek W. (eds.) Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Marochkin S (2007) International Law in the Courts of the Russian Federation: Practice of Application. Chinese Journal of International Law 6 (2): 329–344,  https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmm013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Marochkin S (2018) Evropejskij Sud po pravam cheloveka i Kostitucionnj Sud Rossii dvadcat’ let spostya: v budushchee nazad? (Part I) [European Court of Human Rights and Russian Constitutional Court Twenty Years After: Back to the Future?] Rosskijsij uridicheskij zhurnal 5 (122): 21–32.Google Scholar
  59. Marochkin S (2019) Evropejskij Sud po pravam cheloveka i Kostitucionnj Sud Rossii dvadcat’ let spostya: v budushchee nazad? (Part II) [European Court of Human Rights and Russian Constitutional Court Twenty Years After: Back to the Future?] Rosskijsij uridicheskij zhurnal 1 (124): 9–22.Google Scholar
  60. Marochkin S, Nelaeva G (2016) Lauri Mälksoo, Russian Approaches to International Law (book review), Chinese Journal of International Law 15 (3): 711–713.  https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmw033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mechkova V, Lührmann A, Lindberg S I (2017) How Much Democratic Backsliding? Journal of Democracy 28 (4): 162–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Moravcsik A (2000) The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization 54 (2): 217–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Morozova N (2009) Geopolitics, Eurasianism and Russian Foreign Policy Under Putin. Geopolitics, 14:667–686.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040903141349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Motoc I., Ziemele I (2016) The Impact of the ECHR on Democratic Change in CEE, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Nikolaev A M., Davtyan M K (2018) Ispolnenie reshenij Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka i Mezhamerikanskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka: sravnitel’nyj analiz [Compliance with the ECtHR and Inter-American Court of Human Rights decisions: a comparative study]// Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniya 4: 40–46.  https://doi.org/10.12737/art.2018.4.5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Plattner M. F (2016) Is Democracy in Decline? Democracy and Society 13 (1). https://government.georgetown.edu/sites/government/files/files/upload/gu-ds-24.pdf. Accessed 02 September 2019.
  67. Powderly J (2019) International criminal justice in an age of perpetual crisis. Leiden Journal of International law 32: 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156518000675 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Prakash A., Dolšak, N (2017) International Organizations and the Crisis of Legitimacy // Global Policy Journal. 12 June 2017. https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/12/06/2017/international-organizations-and-crisis-legitimacy. Accessed 02 September 2019.
  69. Prina F (2012) Power, Politics And Participation: The Russian Federation’s National Minorities And Their Participatory Rights. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 30 (1): 66–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Risse T., Sikkink K (1999) The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction. In Risse T, Ropp S, Sikkink K (eds). The Power of Human Rights. International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
  71. Romanovskij G B (2017) «Delo Anchugova i Gladkova» i resheniya Konstitucionnogo Suda RF, organov konstitucionnogo kontrolya zarubezhnyh stran [Anchugov and Gladkov decision and // Lex Russica 2 (123): 135–146.Google Scholar
  72. Schroeder R L, Karpov V (2013) The Crimes and Punishments of the ‘Enemies of the Church’ and the Nature of Russia’s Desecularising Regime. Religion, State and Society 41 (3): 284–311.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2013.837705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sikkink K (03 October 2014) Networks- International Relations. The Open University. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzIAIPl_vhk. .
  74. Slaughter A (1994) Typology of Transjudicial Communication. University of Richmond Law Review: 29 (1): 99–137. https://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview/vol29/iss1/6/ Accessed 12 October 2019.Google Scholar
  75. Soley X, Steininger S (2018) Parting ways or lashing back? Withdrawals, backlash and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. International Journal of Law in Context 14: 137–157.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552318000058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stoeckl K, Medvedeva K (2018) Double bind at the UN: Western actors, Russia, and the traditionalist agenda. Global Constitutionalism 7 (3): 383–421. Doi:  https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381718000163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Swiebel J, van der Veur D (2009). Hate Crimes Against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Persons and the Policy Response of International Governmental Organizations. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 27 (4): 485–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Torosyan R A (2017) Voprosy sotsial’nogo obespecheniya muzhchin v sfere semejnyh otnoshenij v resheniyah Kostotutsionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federatsii i Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka [On the Question of Social Protection of Men in the Field of Family Relations in the Decisions of Russia’s Constitutional Court and the ECtHR] Izvestija Saratovskogo Universiteta. Seriya Ekonomika, Upravlenie, Pravo 17: 196–103.Google Scholar
  79. Trubnikova T V (2011). Pravo na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel’stvo: pravovye pozicii Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka i ih realizaciya v ugolovnom processe Rossijskoj Federacii [The Rights to a Fair Trial: Legal Positions of the ECtHR and their Realization in Russia’s Criminal Procedure]. Tomsk: Tomsk State University Publishing House.Google Scholar
  80. Vajpan G V (2016) Trudno byt’ bogom: Konstitucionnyj Sud Rossii i ego pervoe delo o vozmozhnosti ispolneniya postanovleniya Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. Sravnitel’noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie 4: 107–124.  https://doi.org/10.21128/1812-7126-2016-4-107-124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Voeten E. Populism and Backlashes Against International Courts. 17 October 2018. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3255764. Accessed 02 September 2019.
  82. Von Staden A (2018) Pushing the Envelope: Minimalist Compliance in the UK Prisoner Voting Rights Cases. ECHR Blog. http://echrblog.blogspot.com/2018/11/guest-blog-minimalist-compliance-in-uk.html. Accessed 01 September 2019.
  83. Waldner D, Lust E (2018) Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding. Annual Review of Political Science 21: 93–113.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Galina A. Nelaeva
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elena A. Khabarova
    • 2
  • Natalia V. Sidorova
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Modern History and World Politics, Institute of Social Sciences and HumanitiesUniversity of TyumenTyumenRussia
  2. 2.Department of Criminal Law and Procedure, Institute of State and LawUniversity of TyumenTyumenRussia
  3. 3.Department of Criminal Law and Procedure, Institute of State and LawUniversity of TyumenTyumenRussia

Personalised recommendations