Advertisement

Human Rights Review

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 103–122 | Cite as

The Ministerialization of Transitional Justice

  • Christopher K. LamontEmail author
  • Joanna R. Quinn
  • Eric Wiebelhaus-Brahm
Article

Abstract

In recent years, countries have begun to establish ministries of transitional justice (TJ) as part of political transitions from authoritarianism to democracy or from conflict to peace. This may reflect a broader historical trend in the administration of TJ, which has evolved from isolated offices within a particular ministry to ad hoc cross-ministry coordinating bodies to the establishment of dedicated ministries. The reasons for the establishment of specific ministries to pursue TJ, what we call ministerialization, have not attracted scholarly attention. This article explores the causes and likely consequences of this development. In particular, it applies international relations, comparative politics, and public policy theories to explain the phenomenon. Contrary to some TJ literature that is concerned about hegemonic transnational (largely Western) discourse, international actors have played little to no role in shaping how TJ is bureaucratically managed. Rather, based upon fieldwork in Solomon Islands and Tunisia, the article concludes that ministerialization has been the result of domestic policy entrepreneurship. For TJ ministries to become a norm, however, more transnational actors will need to be convinced of the benefits of such an institutional arrangement.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Eric-Wiebelhaus-Brahm thanks Hayden Cuffman and Cameron Graves for valuable research assistance.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Ethics clearance for interviews in Solomon Islands was obtained from the Non-Medical Research Ethics Board of The University of Western Ontario through protocol #16121S. Ethics clearance for interviews in Tunisia was obtained from Globalisation Studies Groningen at the University of Groningen. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.

References

  1. Alexander, Christopher. 1997. Back from the Democratic Brink: Authoritarianism and Civil Society in Tunisia. Middle East Report, no. 205: 34–38.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3013093.
  2. Ashraf, Asim. 2015. Hopes Fade for Transitional Justice in Egypt. Al-Araby, March 5, 2015. http://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/features/2015/3/5/hopes-fade-for-transitional-justice-in-egypt.
  3. Batchelor, Peter, and Keith Krause. 2004. Small Arms Survey 2004: Rights at Risk. Geneva: Graduate Institute of International Studies. http://www.smallarmssurvey.org/fileadmin/docs/A-Yearbook/2004/en/Small-Arms-Survey-2004-Chapter-09-EN.pdf.Google Scholar
  4. Bellin, Eva. 2012. A Modest Transformation: Political Change in the Arab World After the Arab Spring. In The Arab Spring: Will It Lead to Democratic Transitions?, edited by Clement Henry and Ji-Hyang Jang, 34–48. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Boraine, Alexander L. 2006. Transitional Justice: A Holistic Interpretation. Journal of International Affairs 60 (1): 17–27.Google Scholar
  6. Braithwaite, John, Sinclair Dinnen, Matthew Allen, Valerie Braithwaite, and Hilary Charlesworth. 2010. Pillars and Shadows: Statebuilding as Peacebuilding in Solomon Islands. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, Terry. 2015. Solomons TRC Report tabled in Parliament. ASAONET Listserv. Association for Social Anthropology in Oceania. 16 July.Google Scholar
  8. Cardenas, Sonia. 2014. Chains of Justice: The Global Rise of State Institutions for Human Rights. 1st ed. Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carroll, Toby, and Shahar Hameiri. 2007. Good Governance and Security: The Limits of Australia’s New Aid Program. Journal of Contemporary Asia 37 (4).Google Scholar
  10. Ciorciari, John D., and Anne Heindel. 2014. Hybrid Justice: The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  11. Collier, Ruth Berins, and David Collier. 2002. Shaping The Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press. http://undpress.nd.edu/books/P00754.Google Scholar
  12. De Greiff, Pablo. 2012. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Guarantees of Non-Recurrence. United Nations A/HRC/21/46. New York: United Nations. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session21/A-HRC-21-46_en.pdf.
  13. Dickinson, Laura A. 2003. The Promise of Hybrid Courts. American Journal of International Law 97 (2).Google Scholar
  14. Esposito, John L., and James P. Piscatori. 1991. Democratization and Islam. Middle East Journal 45 (3): 427–40.Google Scholar
  15. Finnemore, Martha. 1993. International Organizations as Teachers of Norms: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization and Science Policy. International Organization 47 (4): 565–97.Google Scholar
  16. Fraenkel, Jon. 2004. The Manipulation of Custom: From Uprising to Intervention in the Solomon Islands. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Goodenough, Nick. 1986. Reconciliation and the Criminal Process in the Solomon Islands. Journal of South Pacific Law 10 (1).Google Scholar
  18. Gray, Doris H., and Terry Coonan. 2013. Silence Kills! Women and the Transitional Justice Process in Post-Revolutionary Tunisia. International Journal of Transitional Justice 7 (2): 348–57.Google Scholar
  19. Gready, Paul. 2010. The Era of Transitional Justice: The Aftermath of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa and Beyond. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Grodsky, Brian K. 2010. The Costs of Justice: How New Leaders Respond to Previous Rights Abuses. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hayner, Priscilla B. 2011. Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Ikenberry, G. John, and Charles A. Kupchan. 1990. Socialization and Hegemonic Power. International Organization 44: 283–315.Google Scholar
  23. Jeffery, Renée. 2014a. Beyond Repair?: Collective and Moral Reparations at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal. Journal of Human Rights 13 (1): 103–19.Google Scholar
  24. Jeffery, Renée. 2014b. Reconciliation and the Rule of Law in the Solomon Islands. In Transitional Justice in the Asia-Pacific, edited by Renée Jeffery and Kim, Hun Joon. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kingdon, John W. 2011. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Updated 2nd. Longman Classics in Political Science. Boston: Longman.Google Scholar
  27. Krueger, Anne K. 2016. The Global Diffusion of Truth Commissions: An Integrative Approach to Diffusion as a Process of Collective Learning. Theory and Society 45 (2): 143–68.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-016-9267-x.Google Scholar
  28. Lamont, Christopher K. 2017. The Scope and Boundaries of Transitional Justice in the Arab Spring. In Transitional Justice in the Middle East and North Africa, edited by Chandra Sriram, 83–100. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Loyle, Cyanne E., and Christian Davenport. 2015. Transitional Injustice: Subverting Justice in Transition and Post-Conflict Societies. Journal of Human Rights.Google Scholar
  30. Lutz, Ellen, and Kathryn Sikkink. 2001. The Justice Cascade: The Evolution and Impact of Foreign Human Rights Trials in Latin America. Chicago Journal of International Law 2 (1): 1–33.Google Scholar
  31. Madlingozi, Tshepo. 2010. On Transitional Justice Entrepreneurs and the Production of Victims. Journal of Human Rights Practice 2 (2).Google Scholar
  32. McEvoy, Kieran, and Lorna McGregor, eds. 2008. Transitional Justice from Below: Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change. Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, Zinaida. 2008. Effects of Invisibility: In Search of the ‘Economic’ in Transitional Justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice 2 (3): 266–91.Google Scholar
  34. Moravcsik, Andrew. 1995. Explaining International Human Rights Regimes: Liberal Theory and Western Europe. European Journal of International Relations 1 (157–189).Google Scholar
  35. Moravcsik, A. 2000. The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization 54 (2): 217–52.Google Scholar
  36. Muck, William, and Eric Wiebelhaus-Brahm. 2016. External Transitional Justice Funding: Introducing a New Dataset. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 11 (2): 66–71.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15423166.2016.1183509.Google Scholar
  37. National Parliament of Solomon Islands. 2007. Head 294-National Unity, Reconciliation and Peace. House Hansard. Available from http://www.parliament.gov.sb/index.php?q=node/80. Accessed 25 Oct. 2014.Google Scholar
  38. Nouwen, Sarah M. H. 2013. Complementarity in the Line of Fire: The Catalysing Effect of the International Criminal Court in Uganda and Sudan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. O’Callaghan, Mary Louise, ed. 2013. Rebuilding a Nation: Ten Years of the Solomon Islands-RAMSI Partnership. Canberra: Regional Assistance Mission to the Solomon Islands. http://www.ramsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Rebuilding-a-Nation-RAMSI-EBook-185ca1c0-4b11-4ea0-86ac-eb0110e15b66-0.pdf.
  40. Peters, Rebecca. 2011. Solomon Islands. In Peacemaking in Asia and the Pacific: Women’s Participation, Perspectives and Priorities, Women at the Peace Table Asia Pacific, edited by Cate Buchanan. Geneva: Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue.Google Scholar
  41. Pierson, Paul. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–67.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011.Google Scholar
  42. Przeworski, Adam, and Henry Teune. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  43. Seawright, Jason, and John Gerring. 2008. Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly 61 (2): 294–308.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077.Google Scholar
  44. Shaw, Rosalind, Lars Waldorf, and Pierre Hazan. 2010. Localizing Transitional Justice: Interventions and Priorities after Mass Violence. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Sikkink, Kathryn. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. 1st ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  46. Skaar, Elin, and Eric Wiebelhaus-Brahm. 2013. The Drivers of Transitional Justice: An Analytical Framework for Assessing the Role of Actors. Nordic Journal of Human Rights 31 (2): 127–48.Google Scholar
  47. Solomon Islands. Legal Notice No. 36. 3 Nov. 2000.Google Scholar
  48. Solomon Islands Ministry of Commerce, Industries, Labour & Immigration. 2002. Solomon Islands Government Programme of Action: Policy Objectives, Strategies and Targets 2002-2005. Honiara, Jan. Available from www.commerce.gov.sb/Gov/PresentGov.html#forward2. Accessed 25 Oct. 2014.Google Scholar
  49. Solomon Islands. 2008. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission Act 2008 (No.5)Google Scholar
  50. Sriram, Chandra Lekha. 2013. Spoilers of Justice. Nordic Journal of Human Rights 31 (2): 248–61.Google Scholar
  51. Subotić, Jelena. 2009. Hijacked Justice: Dealing with the Past in the Balkans. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Subotic, Jelena. 2012. The Transformation of International Transitional Justice Advocacy. International Journal of Transitional Justice 6 (1): 106–25.Google Scholar
  53. Todd Landman, (2002) Comparative Politics and Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly 24 (4):890-923Google Scholar
  54. Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. UNDP-Honiara Sub-office, Fiji Multi-Country Office. 2013. Final Project Report (Reporting Period: 1 Oct. 2009-30 Sept. 2011). Honiara: UNDP, May.Google Scholar
  56. Wainwright, Elsina. 2003. Our Failing Neighbour: Australia and the Future of Solomon Islands. Canberra: Australian Strategic Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  57. Wilson, James Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tokyo International UniversityKawagoeJapan
  2. 2.The University of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  3. 3.University of Arkansas at Little RockLittle RockUSA

Personalised recommendations