Advertisement

East Asia

pp 1–13 | Cite as

Preventable or Unpreventable Chinese Smog Problem in Media: How Attribution Tells the Story

  • Minghui FanEmail author
  • Shuhua Zhou
  • Panfeng Yu
Article

Abstract

China’s polluted air has seriously affected the health of the Chinese population. This paper uses attribution theory to investigate how Chinese newspapers and non-Chinese newspapers presented smog in China and attributed causes and responsibilities. Built on previous studies, this study adopted covariation model within attribution theory and painted an interesting picture of smog coverage by Chinese and non-Chinese newspapers because of the apparent differences in perspectives. The criteria further provided folder for elaboration on explaining why the different coverages attributed causes as they did. Implications are discussed.

Keywords

Attribution Smog Covariation model Media coverage 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Greenpeace (2015). China’s ‘airmageddon’ could cause over 250,000 premature deaths. 01 April 2018 [Online] http://www.greenpeace.org/eastasia/press/releases/climate-energy/2015/dangerous-breathing-2/
  2. 2.
    The Guardian (2011). Blogging battle over Beijing smog | Jonathan Watts. 07 December 2011 [Online] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2011/dec/07/blog-beijing-smog
  3. 3.
    Xinhuanet (2011). How to compare the air quality within our environment? 09 November 2011 [Online] http://news.xinhuanet.com/2011-11/09/c_122254431.htm
  4. 4.
    Wu, M. (2006). Framing AIDS in China: A comparative analysis of US and Chinese wire news coverage of HIV/AIDS in China. Asian Journal of Communication, 16(3), 251-272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feng, M., Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2012). Framing the Chinese baby formula scandal: a comparative analysis of US and Chinese news coverage. Asian Journal of Communication, 22(3), 253-269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luther, C. A., & Zhou, X. (2005). Within the boundaries of politics: News framing of SARS in China and the United States. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(4), 857-872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cox, R. (2013). Environmental communication and the public sphere. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality (Vol. 256). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heider, F. (1959). On perception, event structure, and the psychological environment. Psychological issues, 1(3), 1-123.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duan, R., & Takahashi, B. (2017). The two-way flow of news: A comparative study of American and Chinese newspaper coverage of Beijing’s air pollution. International Communication Gazette, 79(1), 83-107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, M., & Li, C. (2017). Competing discursive constructions of China’s smog in Chinese and Anglo-American English-language newspapers: A corpus-assisted discourse study. Discourse & Communication, 11(4), 386-403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ma, L. (2015). The Beijing Smog: Between Media Frames and Public Perceptions. China Media Research, 11(4).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pearson, M. M. (2007). Governing the Chinese economy: Regulatory reform in the service of the state. Public Administration Review, 67(4), 718-730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Taylor, L. D. (2008). The blame game: Elements of causal attribution and its impact on siding with agents in the news. Communication Research, 35(6), 723-744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weiner, B. (2011). Attribution theory. A Companion to the Philosophy of Action, pp. 366-373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McClure, J. (1985). The social parameter of" learned" helplessness: Its recognition and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Iyengar, S. (1990). Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty. Political behavior, 12(1), 19-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tong, J. (2014). Environmental risks in newspaper coverage: A framing analysis of investigative reports on environmental problems in 10 Chinese newspapers. Environmental Communication, 8(3), 345-367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zu, G. (2015). Framing Pollution: An Analysis of the Coverage of Air Pollution in China in 2013 by ChinaDaily. com (Master’s Thesis, Ohio University).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Crittenden, K. S. (1983). Sociological aspects of attribution. Annual review of sociology, 9(1), 425-446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In Nebraska symposium on motivation. University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American psychologist, 28(2), 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McClure, J., Allen, M. W., & Walkey, F. (2001). Countering fatalism: Causal information in news reports affects judgments about earthquake damage. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23(2), 109-121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hewstone, M., & Jaspars, J. (1987). Covariation and causal attribution: A Logical Model of the intuitive analysis of variance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(4), 663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li, H., & Svarverud, R. (2018). When London hit the headlines: historical analogy and the Chinese media discourse on air pollution. The China Quarterly, 234, 357-376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Van de Ven, J. (2014). Air pollution policy making and social media in Beijing, 2011–2013. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhao, Y. (2000). From commercialization to conglomeration: The transformation of the Chinese press within the orbit of the party state. Journal of communication, 50(2), 3-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Communication and Information SciencesUniversity of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA
  2. 2.Missouri School of JournalismUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.Hugh Downs School of Human CommunicationArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations