Advertisement

‘Unaccompanied’ Minors? Accompanied Foreign Minors, Families and New Technologies

  • Karmele Mendoza PérezEmail author
  • Marta Morgade Salgado
Article
  • 115 Downloads

Abstract

This work aims to make apparent the importance of family, throughout the life trajectories of a group of young people whose very juridical designation—unaccompanied foreign minors—seems to preclude the possibility of recognising and appreciating such importance. Here, we present the results of an ethnographic and participatory research with ‘unaccompanied’ foreign minors in Bizkaia (Spain). By using our chosen methodology, we were able to understand how, with their currently transitory lifestyles as children in care, they fulfil their own social, emotional and identity needs, needs that the Social Care System alone is unable to meet. This study also shows how digital media cross all the social relations of these children. Digital media become an essential methodological tool for studying the daily life of young migrants.

Keywords

Mobile phones Youth Participatory research Unaccompanied foreign minors Family 

References

  1. Aguilar Jr., F. V. (2013). Brother’s keeper? Siblingship, overseas migration, and centripetal ethnography in a Philippine village. Ethnography, 14(3), 346–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Althusser, L. (2006). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation). The Anthropology of the State: A Reader, 9(1), 86–98.Google Scholar
  3. Arartekoa (2014). Informe anual al Parlamento Vasco 2014. Informe de la Oficina de la Infancia y la Adolescencia. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Arartekoa.Google Scholar
  4. Baldassar, L. (2008). Debating culture across distance: transnational families and the obligation to care. In R. Grillo (Ed.), The family in question: immigrant and ethnic minorities in multicultural Europe (pp. 269–291). Amsterdam: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldassar, L., & Merla, L. (Eds.). (2013). Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care: understanding mobility and absence in family life. Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bargach, A. (2008). La integración del menor migrante sin referente adulto en el país receptor: un reto universal para la educación intercultural. I Jornadas internacionales de Educación intercultural. VI Jornadas de Diagnóstico y Orientación de la Educación Intercultural. Jaén (Spain), 21–23 February, 2008. Available from http://www.mugak.eu.
  7. Boccagni, P. (2010). Migrants’ social protection as a transnational process: public policies and emigrant initiative in the case of Ecuador. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20(3), 318–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryceson, D., & Vuorela, U. (2002). The transnational family new European frontiers and global networks. Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar
  9. Chavez, L., & Menjívar, C. (2010). Children without borders: a mapping of the literature on unaccompanied migrant children to the United States. Migraciones Internacionales, 5(3), 71–111.Google Scholar
  10. Dyrness, A. (2008). Research for change versus research as change: lessons from a Mujerista participatory research team. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 39(1), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Empez, N. (2011). Social construction of neglect: the case of unaccompanied minors from Morocco to Spain. In A. Kraler, E. Kofman, M. Kohli, & C. Schmoll (Eds.), Gender, generations and the family in international migration (pp. 121–138). Amsterdam: University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Foucault, M. (2002). The subject and power. In D. Faubion (Ed.), Power (pp. 327–348). New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  13. Giménez, C. & Suárez, L. (2001). Menores no acompañados que han entrado en territorio español sin representación legal. Informe de Investigación, 3.Google Scholar
  14. Gimeno, C. (2014a). Recherche sur les migrations clandestines des jeunes et éthique du travailleur social chercheur. Le sociographe, 5, 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gimeno, C. (2014b). Buscavidas: la globalización de las migraciones juveniles. Zaragoza: Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
  16. Gimeno, C. (2015). Cultural bricolage on minors who migrate on their own. In Perverse identities: identities in conflicto (pp. 527–559). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  17. Herrera, G. (2004). Elementos para una comprensión de las familias transnacionales desde la experiencia migratoria. In F. Hidalgo (Ed.), Migraciones: Un juego con cartas marcadas (pp. 215–233). Quito: Abya Yala.Google Scholar
  18. Horst, H. A., Herr-Stephonson, B., & Robinson, L. (2010). Media ecologies. In M. Ito (Ed.), Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: kids living and learning with new media (pp. 29–78). Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Human Rights Watch. (2002). Nowhere to turn. State abuses of unaccompanied migrant children by Spain and Morocco. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
  20. Human Rights Watch. (2009). Lost in transit: insufficient protection for unaccompanied migrant children at Roissy Charles de Gaulle Airport. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
  21. Human Rights Watch. (2010). En la trampa de la migración: menores extranjeros no acompañados en Europa, Informe Mundial 2010. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
  22. Jiménez, M. (2003). Buscarse la vida: Análisis transnacional de los procesos migratorios de los menores marroquíes no acompañados en Andalucía. Ediciones SM.Google Scholar
  23. Jiménez, M. (2015). Autonomous child migration at the southern European border. In Ni Laoire, C. et al. (Eds.), Movement, mobilities and journeys, geographies of children and young people, 6. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-4585-93-4_15-1.Google Scholar
  24. Jiménez, M. (2016). Children’s rights and mobility at the border. Space, Place, and Environment, 3, 543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jiménez, M. (2017). Subjectivities on the edge. Identities and Subjectivities, 351–367.Google Scholar
  26. Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2011). Mobile phone parenting: reconfiguring relationships between Filipina migrant mothers and their left-behind children. New Media & Society, 13(3), 457–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Markez, I., & Pastor, F. (2009). Drogodependencia en menores extranjeros no acompañados (MENA): su derecho a una educación y salud de calidad. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco.Google Scholar
  28. Medina, M. C. (2010). Relaciones afectivas: comunicación, cotidianidad familiar y remesas. In A. M. Rivas & H. Gonzálvez (Eds.), Familias transnacionales colombianas. Transformaciones y permanencias en las relaciones familiares y de género (pp. 91–144). Madrid: Catarata.Google Scholar
  29. Mendoza Pérez, K. (2016). “Iwalida te echo tanto de menos: Menores migrantes, familias y nuevas tecnologías”. Seminario Sobre Desarrollo Humano y Educación. Madrid, UAM, December 21, 2016.Google Scholar
  30. Mendoza Pérez, K. (2017). Adolescentes y jóvenes migrantes en Bizkaia: Prácticas de vida y socialidad. PhD Dissertation. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
  31. Mendoza Pérez, K., & Belarra, I. (2015). Menores Migrantes en Bizkaia: Entre la protección y el control. Revista Internacional de Estudios Migratorios, 5(2), 227–259.Google Scholar
  32. Mendoza Pérez, K., & Morgade Salgado, M. (2016). Same plans, different strategies: the multiple faces of resistance. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24, 617–630.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2016.1197962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mendoza Pérez, K., & Morgade Salgado, M. (2018). Doing masculinity: the “look” of unaccompanied male migrant teenagers from the Maghreb. Men and Masculinities.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17748169.
  34. Mitchell, C. (2011). Doing visual research. Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Mohanty, C. T. (1988). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review, 30, 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Montesino Parra, N., & Jiménez, M. (2015). Child mobility and transnational responses. Transnational Social Review, 5(3), 332–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moore, M. (2011). Invisible families: gay identities, relationships, and motherhood among Black women. California: Univ of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. Morgade, M., & Müller, F. (2015). A participação das crianças nos estudos da infância e as possibilidades da etnografia sensorial. Currículo sem Fronteiras, 15(1), 107–126.Google Scholar
  39. Ochoa de Alda, I., Antón, J., Rodriguez, A., & Atabi, H. (2009). La importancia del trabajo con la familia en la atención a menores extranjeros no acompañados. Un estudio piloto. Apuntes de Psicología, 27(2–3), 427–439.Google Scholar
  40. Palomares, M., & Poveda, D. (2010). Linguistic ethnography and the study of welfare institutions as a flow of social practices: the case of residential child care institutions as paradoxical institutions. Text & Talk, 30(2), 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pedone, C. (2007). Familias transnacionales ecuatorianas: estrategias productivas y reproductivas. Ciudadanía y Exclusión: Ecuador y España frente al espejo, 251–278.Google Scholar
  42. Peris, L. F. (2015). La tutela transnacional compartida (TTC) como superior interés de los menores extranjeros no acompañados con vínculos familiares. PhD thesis, Universidad Pontificia de Comillas, Madrid.Google Scholar
  43. Pink, S., Hubbard, P., O'neill, M., & Radley, A. (2010). Walking across disciplines: from ethnography to arts practice. Visual Studies, 25(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Punch, S. (2002). Research with children. The same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9(3), 321–341.Google Scholar
  45. Quiroga, V., Alonso, A., Sòria, M., & Sagadoy, C. (2009). Sueños de bolsillo: menores migrantes no acompañados en el País Vasco. Eusko Jaurlaritzaren Argitalpen Zerbitzu Nagusia=Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco.Google Scholar
  46. Ramos Espejo, M. (2015). Destutelados: jóvenes extutelados en desamparo. In Actas del VIII Congreso sobre Migraciones Internacionales en España: Granada, 16-18 de septiembre de 2015 (p. 190). Instituo de Migraciones.Google Scholar
  47. Sansi, R. (2015). Art, anthropology and the gift. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  48. Suárez-Navaz, L., & Jiménez, M. (2011). Menores en el campo migratorio transnacional. Los niños del centro (Drari d’sentro). Papers: Revista de Sociologia, 96(1), 11–33.Google Scholar
  49. Vacchiano, F., & Jiménez, M. (2012). Between agency and repression: Moroccan children on the edge. Children’s Geographies, 10(4), 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Meeteren, M., Engbersen, G., & van San, M. (2009). Striving for a better position: Aspirations and the role of cultural, economic, and social Capital for Irregular Migrants in Belgium. International Migration Review, 43(4), 881–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Westwood, J. L. (2012). Constructing risk and avoiding need: Findings from interviews with social workers and police officers involved in safeguarding work with migrant children. Child Abuse Review, 21, 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wernesjö, U. (2014). Conditional belonging: Listening to unaccompanied young refugees’ voices. PhD thesis. Department of Sociology, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
  53. Xiang, B., & Toyota, M. (2013). Ethnographic experiments in transnational mobility studies. Ethnography, 14(3), 277–281.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138113491655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad de EducaciónUniversidad de ExtremaduraBadajozSpain
  2. 2.Facultad de PsicologíaUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations