Advertisement

Einwanderungsland? Germany’s Asylum Dilemma in Policy and Design

  • Silvia DanielakEmail author
Article

Abstract

Germany has experienced an unprecedented influx of refugees over the last years. In dealing with the so-called crisis, the management of settlement and housing of refugees is a crucial aspect. Germany’s asylum policy—torn between long-term versus short-term and permanent versus temporary approaches and solutions—has equally contradictory spatial implications. This article brings together policy with design. Through the analysis of an architectural project database featuring recent refugee housing projects across Germany and some of its neighboring countries, this paper explores design responses to the refugee influx. It shows that the refugee shelter design is equally torn and reflects the political inconsistency that is symptomatic of the wider context of Germany’s current asylum policy.

Keywords

Asylum policy Shelter Architecture Design Germany 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ager, A., & Strang, A. (2008). Understanding integration: a conceptual framework. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21, 166–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (2017). Entwicklung der jährlichen Asylantragszahlen seit 1953. http://www.bamf.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/DE/Downloads/Infothek/Statistik/Asyl/aktuelle-zahlen-zu-asyl-maerz-2017.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. Accessed 30 April 2017.
  3. Bundesregierung (2016). Wohnsitzauflage mit Arbeitsperspektive. Press Statement. https://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/Namensbeitrag/IB/2016-02-25-wohnsitzauflage.html. Accessed 30 April 2017.
  4. Database (2017). Deutsches Architektur Museum. http://www.makingheimat.de/en/refugee-housing-projects/database. Accessed 30 April 2017.
  5. Datel, R. E., & Dingemans, D. J. (1984). Environmental perception, historic preservation, and sense of place. Research Paper, University of Chicago, Department of Geography, 209, 131–144.Google Scholar
  6. Dullroy, J. (2016). Housing for refugees takes center stage at Venice Architecture Biennale. Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-refugees-architecture-idUSKCN0YM28D. Accessed 30 April 2017.
  7. EU Court of Justice (2016). Press Release No 22/16. http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2016-03/cp160022en.pdf. Accessed 1 Mai 2017.
  8. Frei, X., & Kluge, J. (2016). Die Wohnsitzauflage als kostspielige Integrationsbremse für Flüchtlinge. ifo. Dresden berichtet, 23(06), 30–34.Google Scholar
  9. Ministerium für Arbeit, Integration und Soziales / Ministry for Work, Integration and Social Affairs (2016). Minister Schmeltzer: Das Land unterstützt mit der Wohnsitzauflage die Integrationsarbeit der Städte und Gemeinden in NRW. https://www.land.nrw/de/pressemitteilung/minister-schmeltzer-das-land-unterstuetzt-mit-der-wohnsitzauflage-die. Accessed 30 April 2017.
  10. Oltermann, P. (2016). Germany unveils integration law for refugees. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/14/germany-unveils-integration-law-for-refugees-migrants. Accessed 30 April 2017.
  11. Puttnam, R. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 137–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. Vol. 67. London: Pion.Google Scholar
  13. Spiegel Staff (2016). We will undergo a multicultural transformation. Spiegel Online. www.spiegel.de/international/germany/22-germans-speak-about-challenges-of-integrating-refugees-a-1075661-14.html. Accessed 27 April 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of DesignHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations