Advertisement

The Meaning of Detention on Life Trajectories and Self-Identities: the Perspectives of Detained Migrants in a Removal Centre in Portugal

  • Paula Cristina SampaioEmail author
  • Isabel Estrada CarvalhaisEmail author
Article
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

Migrants need the consent of the host country to enter and stay in its territory as the right to “immigration” itself does not exist. States have the autonomy to regulate access to their territory with a variety of rules depending on the type of migration. One of the mechanisms of control that states use, and a means for the management of immigration, is administrative detention. This study intends to reflect on the phenomenon of detention of non-national migrants in Portugal, from the perspective of the agent. While the Portuguese legal frame may be broadly aligned with the European and the international frames and in wide compliance with the human rights’ expectations, our concern focuses on how the individual lives the experience of being institutionally and legally labelled as an irregular, deprived of freedom. The experience of dealing with deviance, which by its turn results from a condition external to the individual, is a phenomenon to which citizenship and migration studies still need to pay more attention.

Keywords

Migrants Detention Deviance Trajectory Identity Irregular Agent Portugal 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT—Portugal) as the founding institution of the Centre of Research in Political Science (UID/CPO/00758/2013) of the University of Minho.

References

  1. Aas, K. F. (2000). Globalization & Crime. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Psychological Society (APS) (2012). Submission to the Expert Panel on Asylum Seekers [online] http://www.psychology.org.au/Assets/Files/2012-APS-Submission-to-the-Expert-Panel-on-Asylum-Seekers-July.pdfGoogle Scholar
  3. Baganha, M. I. (2005). Política de imigração: a regulação dos fluxos. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, (73), 29–44.Google Scholar
  4. Balzacq, et al. (2015). Securitization’ revisited: theory and cases. International Relations, 30(4), 494–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauman, Z. (2013). Cegueira Moral . Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editor.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, H. S. (2008). Outsiders: estudos da sociologia do desvio. (1st ed). Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editor.Google Scholar
  7. Berry, J. (Ed.). (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. International Association of Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5–68.Google Scholar
  8. Berry, J. (2001). A psychology of immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 615–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhugra, D. (2004). Migration and mental health. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 109, 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bigo, D. (2008). Globalized (In)security: the Field and the Ban-opticon. In D. Bigo & A. Tsoukala (Eds.), Terror, Insecurity and Liberty (pp. 10–48). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Bigo, D. (2010). International Political Sociology. In P. D. Williams (Ed.), Security Studies: An Introduction (pp. 116–129). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Bigo, D. (2016). Security, Surveillance and Democracy. In K. Ball et al. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies (pp. 277–284). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Bigo, D., & Tsoukala, A. (2008). Understanding (In)security. In D. Bigo & A. Tsoukala (Eds.), Terror, Insecurity and Liberty (pp. 1–9). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Black, J. A., & Champion, D. J. (1976). Methods and issues in social research. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  15. Borges, N. (2012). O mito da Europa Fortaleza—Análise desassombrada da Diretiva de Retorno. [on line]. https://scientiaivridica.weebly.com
  16. Boswell, C. (2007). Migration control in Europe after 9/11: explaining the absence of securitization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(3), 589–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bosworth, M. (2011). Deportation, detention and foreign-national prisoners in England and Wales. Citizen Studies, 15(5), 583–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bosworth, M. (2012). Subjectivity and identity in detention: punishment and society in a global. Theorical Criminology, 16(7), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bosworth, M., & Kaufman, E. (2011). Foreigners in a Carceral Age: immigration and imprisonment in the United States. Standford Law and Policy Review, 22(1), 101–126.Google Scholar
  20. Buzan, B., et al. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carvalhais, I. E., & Fernandes, S. (2018). Resisting Euroscepticism and Anti-Refugee Populism in Europe: The Portuguese Case. In T. Agarin & N. Nancheva (Eds.), A European Crisis—Perspectives on Refugees, Solidarity, and Europe (pp. 51–74). Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag.Google Scholar
  23. Clemente, M. (2017). Human trafficking in Portugal: an ethnography of research and data. Studi emigrazione. International Journal of Migration Studies, 208, 663–686.Google Scholar
  24. Cohen, S. (2011). Folk Devils and Moral Panics—The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. London: Routledge Classics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cusson, M. (2011). Criminologia (3rd ed.). Alfragide: Casa das Letras.Google Scholar
  26. Decreto-Lei 44/2006 de 24 fevereiro. Diário da República, 1ª série, n.° 40 de 24 de fevereiro.Google Scholar
  27. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  28. DEVAS (2009–2010). Project on detention of vulnerable asylum seekers in the EU. [online] http://helsinki.hu/en/devas-project-on-the-detention-of-vulnerable-asy-lum-seekers-in-the-eu-2009-2010. Accessed 15 July 2017.
  29. Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the l, of 16 December 2008. Official Journal of the EU of 24 December 2008. Available at http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:348:0098:0098:PT:PDF Accessed 10 July 2017.Google Scholar
  30. Düvell, F. (2011). Irregular Immigration, Economics and Politics. Centre on Migration, Policy and Society: University of Oxford [online]. https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/fileadmin/files/People/staff_publications/Duvell/1210202.pdf Accessed 18 June 2017.
  31. Eurostat (2018). Asylum Statistics. Eurostat Statistics Explained. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php/Asylum_statistics#Countri-es_of_destination:_Germany.2C_Italy_and_France_the_main Accessed 03 July 2018.
  32. Fernandes, E. M. & Maia, A. (2001). Grounded Theory. In L. Almeida, & E.M. Fernandes (Eds) Métodos e Técnicas de Avaliação:  Contributos para a prática e investigação psicológicas. Braga: Universidade do Minho.Google Scholar
  33. Foucault, M. (2013). Vigiar e Punir. In Nascimento da Prisão (Vol. 70). Lisboa: Edições.Google Scholar
  34. Fortin, M. F. (2009). O processo de investigação: Da concepção à realização. (Portuguese translation). Loures: Lusociência Edições.Google Scholar
  35. Gil, A. R. (2011). A detenção de imigrantes na jurisprudência nacional e internacional. Revista do Ministério Público, I25: 125–145.Google Scholar
  36. Global Detention Project Annual Report (GDP) (2017) [on line] https://www.globaldetentionproject.org/global-detention-project-annual-report-2017 Accessed 10 December 2018.
  37. Goffmann, E. (2007). Manicómios, Prisões, e Conventos (7th ed.). São Paulo: Editora Perspectivas.Google Scholar
  38. Grant, S. (2011). Immigration detention: some issues of inequality. The Equal Rights Review, 7, 69–82.Google Scholar
  39. Guchteneire, P. (2007). As migrações internacionais ao nível das nações unidas; contra-balançar a governação global e os direitos humanos. In Imigração: oportunidade ou Ameaça? in Actas da conferência internacional 2007. São João do Estoril: Principia.Google Scholar
  40. Guia, M. J. (2012). Imigração, Crime e Crimigração: alteridades e paradoxos. In Actas do VII Congresso Português de Sociologia—Sociedade, Crise e Reconfigurações, Porto.Google Scholar
  41. Jornal de Negócios. (2015). Os imigrantes são os mais atingidos pela crise. Mas também são que mais depressa recuperam. https://www.jornaldenegocios.pt/economia/detalhe/os_imigrantes_sao_os_mais_atingidos_pela_crise_mas_tambem_sao_os_que_mais_depressa_recuperam Accessed 30 June 2018.
  42. Jesuit Refugee Service. (2014). Relatório de atividades 2013.Google Scholar
  43. Jesuit Refugee Service. (2015). Relatório de atividades 2014. Google Scholar
  44. IAHRC—Inter-American Human Rights Court (2013). The Psychosocial Impact of Detention and Deportation on U.S. Migrant Children and Families. Inter-American Human Rights Court [online] http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/centers/hu-manrights/doc/IACHR%20Report%20on%20Pyschosocial%20Impact%20of %20Detention%20%20Deportation-FINAL%208–16-13.pdf Accessed 10 September 2017.Google Scholar
  45. Khosravi, S. (2009). Sweden: detention and deportation of asylum seekers. Race & Class, 50, 38–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kotsioni, I. (2016). Detention of migrants and asylum-seekers: the challenge for humanitarian actors. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 35(2), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lages et al. (2006). Os Imigrantes e a População Portuguesa, Imagens Recíprocas. Lisboa: Observatório da Imigração. [On line]. https://www.om.acm.gov.pt/documents/58428/177157/Estudo_OI_21.pdf/4faf3dc9-6531-4849-b1f0-bddb1bfe3566. Accessed 14 December 2018
  48. Law 23/2007, of 4 July (Lei 23/2007 de 4 de Julho de 2007). Diário da República, 1.a série, n.° 127 de 4 de Julho de 2007. Google Scholar
  49. Law 29/2012 of 9 August (Lei 29/2012, de 09 de Agosto de 2012). Diário da República, 1.ª série, n.° 154 de 9 de Agosto de 2012.Google Scholar
  50. Law 102/2017 of 28 August (Lei 102/2017, de 28 de Agosto 2017) Diário da República, 1.ª série, n.° 165 de 28 de Agosto 2017. Google Scholar
  51. Leite, R. (2010). Os paradoxos do tratamento da imigração ilegal na União Europeia frente à diretiva de Retorno. Revista Espaço Acadêmico, 108, 61–70.Google Scholar
  52. Martinez, R. & Valenzuela, A. (Eds) (2006). Immigration and Crime - Ethnicity, Race, and Violence. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  53. Miskolci, R. (2005). Do Desvio às Diferenças. Teoria & Pesquisa, 47, 9–41.Google Scholar
  54. Neves, A. S. (2011). Women trafficking for sexual exploitation in Portugal: life narratives. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(17) (Special Issue).Google Scholar
  55. Neto, F. (1997). Estudos de psicologia Intercultural—Nós e Outros (3rd ed.). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.Google Scholar
  56. OECD. (2018). International Migration Outlook. 42nd Edition. OECD Publishing. Available at https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/interna-tional-migration-outlook-2018_migr_outlook-2018-en#page1 Accessed 03 July 2018.
  57. O’Reilly, M., & Parker, N. (2012). ‘Unsatisfactory saturation’: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 13(2), 190–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Partinton, G. (2001). Qualitative research interviews: identifying problems in technique. Issues in Educational Research, 11(2), 32–44.Google Scholar
  59. Patarra, N. L. (2006). Migrações internacionais: teorias, políticas e movimentos sociais. Estudos Avançados, 20(57), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pedro, R. S. (2010). A Obra Católica Portuguesa de Migrações e o movimento associativo imigrante em Portugal. Percursos e desafios. in Horta, A.P.B. (org.) Revista Migrações, 6, Thematic issue Associativismo Imigrantes: 163–186.Google Scholar
  61. Peixoto, J., et al. (2005). O Tráfico de Migrantes em Portugal: Perspectivas Sociológicas, Jurídicas e Política. Lisboa: ACIME/Observatório da Imigração Cited by Neves, A.S. (2011). Women Trafficking for Sexual Exploitation in Portugal: Life narratives. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(17) (Special Issue): 186–192.Google Scholar
  62. Pereira, C., Vala, J., & Costa-Lopes, R. (2010). From prejudice to discrimination: the legitimizing role of perceived threat in discrimination against immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1231–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Phillips J. & Spinks, H. (2013). Immigration Detention in Australia. Parliamentary Library. Parliament of Australia. Available at http://apo.org.au/system/files/27835//apo-nid27835-6041.pdf Accessed 10 September 2017.Google Scholar
  64. POAT, Protecção dos Direitos Humanos e Vítimas de Tráfico de Pessoas (2009). Instituto de Estudos Estratégicos e Internacionais. [online]. http://www.poatfse.q-ren.pt/upload/docs/Diversos/ESTUDOS/PROJETO%20POAT %20%E2%80%93FSE%20N%C2%BA%20170402009%20-%20Estudo.pdf Accessed 10 September 2017.Google Scholar
  65. PORDATA (2017a). Taxa de desemprego total. http://www.pordata.pt/Portugal/Taxa+de+desemprego+total+e+por+sexo+(percentagem)-550) Accessed 23 October 2017.Google Scholar
  66. PORDATA (2017b). Taxa de desemprego: total e por grupo etário (%). https://www.pordata.pt/Portugal/Taxa+de+desemprego+total+e+por+grupo+etário+(percen-tagem)-553-5398 Accessed 28 October 2017.Google Scholar
  67. Publico (2018). Portugal foi o país da Europa do Sul onde os imigrantes mais recuperaram o emprego. https://www.publico.pt/2018/06/20/sociedade/noticia/portugal-foi-o-pais-da-europa-do-sul-onde-o-emprego-de-imigrantes-recuperou-comple-tamente-1835204 Accessed 30 June 2018.Google Scholar
  68. Ribeiro, Juliana Cardoso (2018) “As trilhas depois da chegada: Desafios alusivos às diferenciações linguísticas, aos estereótipos lançados e à etnicidade no processo de integração de Brasileiros e Cabo-verdianos no Porto.” Tese de Doutoramento em Sociologia, Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto.Google Scholar
  69. Ríos, P. D. (2008). Migration and psychopathology. Anuario de Psicología Clínica y de la Salud, 4, 15–25.Google Scholar
  70. Ritchie, J. (2003). The Applications of Qualitative Methods to Social Research. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice (pp. 24–46). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  71. Robjant, K., Hassari, R., & Katona, C. (2009). Mental health implications of detaining asylum seekers: systematic review. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 194, 306–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria [on line]. https://med-fom-familymed-research.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2012/03/W10-Corbin-and-Strauss-grounded-theory.pdf Accessed 8 June 2015.Google Scholar
  74. Stumpf, J. (2011). The Crimmigration Crisis: Immigrants, Crime, and Sovereign Power. [on line]. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1274&context=aulr Accessed 10 December 2018.Google Scholar
  75. UNODC—United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2012). Global Report on Trafficking in Persons [online] http://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/ glotip/Trafficking_in_Persons_2012_web.pdf Accessed 10 September 2017.Google Scholar
  76. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) [on line] http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights.
  77. Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zuín, J. C. S. (2010). As contradições da globalização: os centros de confinamento para os imigrantes ilegais na Itália. Mediações, Londrina, 15(2), 61–77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EEG - School of Economics and ManagementUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal
  2. 2.CICP—Centre of Research in Political Science, R&D unit funded by the FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e TecnologiaLisboaPortugal
  3. 3.EEG - School of Economics and ManagementUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations