Advertisement

Urban Forum

pp 1–16 | Cite as

The Diversity of Gateways: Accra, Cape Town and Mauritius as Hinges in Oil and Gas GPNs

  • Sören ScholvinEmail author
Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

Research that stands in the tradition of the world city literature has made essential contributions to our understanding of ‘gateways’. Being logistics and transport hubs, sites of industrial processing, places of corporate control and service provision as well as locations of knowledge generation, gateways are an intermediate step between the periphery and the core of the world economy. They integrate peripheral places into global production networks. Yet, the state of the art insufficiently captures the functional diversity of gateways. This article makes a corresponding contribution. The author analyses how Accra, Cape Town and Mauritius interlink the African oil and gas sector globally. It is shown that corporate control of Ghana’s upstream sector concentrates in Accra, whereas logistics and upstream service provision happen in close proximity to oil and gas fields, in the town of Takoradi. Cape Town has established itself as a logistics and services gateway to sub-Saharan Africa. It also provides critical knowledge to overseas firms that seek to invest in the region. Mauritius pursues an ambitious strategy to become a logistics hub. It already serves as a gateway for financial and technical services. Against the backdrop of such diversity, the author furthermore calls the notion of gateways as sites of highly sophisticated service provision into question. His research ties up with policy recommendations made by the State of African Cities 2018 report and recent debates on generalisation in Urban Studies.

Keywords

Accra Cape Town Gateway Mauritius Oil and gas sector 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. A Barrel Full. (2014a). Tweneboa Enyenra and Ntomme Ten oil and gas fields. http://abarrelfull.wikidot.com/tweneboa-enyenra-and-ntomme-ten-oil-and-fields. Accessed 17 April 2019.
  2. A Barrel Full. (2014b). Jubilee oil field. http://abarrelfull.wikidot.com/jubilee-oil-field. Accessed 17 April 2019.
  3. A Barrel Full. (2017a). Tema refinery. http://abarrelfull.wikidot.com/tema-refinery. Accessed 17 April 2019.
  4. A Barrel Full. (2017b). Caltex Capetown refinery. http://abarrelfull.wikidot.com/caltex-capetown-refinery. Accessed 3 April 2019.
  5. A Barrel Full. (2019). Offshore Cape Three Points gas field. http://abarrelfull.wikidot.com/offshore-cape-three-points-gas-field. Accessed 17 April 2019.
  6. Ablo, A. D. (2015). Local content and participation in Ghana’s oil and gas industry: can enterprise development make a difference? Extractive Industries and Society, 2(2), 320–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ablo, A. D. (2017). The micromechanisms of power in local content requirements and their constraints on Ghanaian SMEs in the oil and gas sector. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 71(2), 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ablo, A. D., & Overå, R. (2015). Networks, trust and capital mobilisation: challenges of embedded local entrepreneurial strategies in Ghana’s oil and gas industry. Journal of Modern African Studies, 53(3), 391–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Africa Report. (2013). Is Mauritius a tax haven?. https://www.theafricareport.com/5249/is-mauritius-a-tax-haven. Accessed 8 April 2019.
  10. Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the urban. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Beaverstock, J. V., Smith, R. G., Taylor, P. J., Walker, D. R. F., & Lorimer, H. (2000). Globalization and world cities: some measurement methodologies. Applied Geography, 20(1), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Breul, M., & Revilla Diez, J. (2018). An intermediate step to resource peripheries: the strategic coupling of gateway cities in the upstream oil and gas GPN. Geoforum, 92(6), 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, E., Derudder, B., Parnreiter, C., Pelupessy, W., Taylor, P. J., & Witlox, F. (2010). World city networks in global commodity chains: towards a world-systems’ integration. In B. Derudder & F. Witlox (Eds.), Commodity chains and world cities (pp. 15–41). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Burghardt, A. F. (1971). A hypothesis about gateway cities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 61(2), 269–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Business Day. (2018). Ghana’s Tema oil refinery seeks state bailout after lenders say no to loans. https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/world/africa/2018-06-26-ghanas-tema-oil-refinery-seeks-state-bailout-after-lenders-say-no-to-loans. Accessed 16 April 2019.
  16. Chubarov, I., & Brooker, D. (2013). Multiple pathways to global city formation: a functional approach and review of recent evidence in China. Cities, 35, 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coe, N. M., & Yeung, H. (2015). Global production networks: theorizing economic development in an interconnected world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Yeung, H. W. C., Dicken, P., & Henderson, J. (2004). ‘Globalizing’ regional development: a global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4), 468–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, S. B. (1990). The world geopolitical system in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Geography, 89(1), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohen, S. B. (1991). Global geopolitical change in the post-Cold War era. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81(4), 551–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Engineering News. (2016). Ghana oil refinery showing signs of profitability. http://www.engineeringnews.co.za/article/ghanaian-oil-refinery-showing-signs-of-profitability-2016-09-02. Accessed 16 April 2019.
  22. Engineering News. (2018). Sinopec commits to R6bn upgrade of Chevron South Africa refinery as buyout deal gathers pace. http://www.engineeringnews.co.za/print-version/competition-commission-grants-conditional-approval-for-sinopecs-900m-chevron-sa-buy-2018-01-11. Accessed 5 April 2019.
  23. Financial Times. (2017). Mauritius struggles with tax haven crackdown. https://www.ft.com/content/e37d1df6-8436-11e7-94e2-c5b903247afd. Accessed 12 April 2019.
  24. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibb, M. (2007). Cape Town, a secondary global city in a developing country. Environment and Planning C, 25(4), 537–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Government Information Service [of Mauritius]. (2016). Oil storage terminal project will propel Mauritius into next phase of development, says PM. http://www.govmu.org/English/News/Pages/Oil-Storage-Terminal-project-will-propel-Mauritius-into-next-phase-of-development,-says-PM.aspx. Accessed 14 April 2019.
  27. Grant, R. (2008). Globalizing city: the urban and economic transformation of Accra, Ghana. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Grant, R. (2011). Accra: a globalizing city. In B. Derudder, M. Hoyler, P. J. Taylor & F. Witlox (Eds.), International handbook of globalization and world cities (pp. 455–464). Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  29. Grant, R., & Nijman, J. (2002). Globalization and the corporate geography of cities in the less-developed world. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(2), 320–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heritage Foundation. (2017). 2017 index of economic freedom. http://www.heritage.org/index/pdf/2017/book/index_2017.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2019.
  31. Hunt, T. (2014). Ten cities that made an empire. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  32. Kanai, J. M., Grant, R., & Jianu, R. (2017). Cities on and off the map: a bibliometric assessment of urban globalisation research. Urban Studies, 55(12), 2569–2585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krätke, S. (2014a). Global pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms’ linkages in the World City Network. Urban Studies, 51(6), 1196–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krätke, S. (2014b). How manufacturing industries connect cities across the world: extending research on ‘multiple globalizations’. Global Networks, 14(2), 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee, S. W., & Ducruet, C. (2009). Spatial glocalization in Asia-Pacific hub port cities: a comparison of Hong Kong and Singapore. Urban Geography, 30(2), 162–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martinus, K., Sigler, T. J., Searle, G., & Tonts, M. (2015). Strategic globalizing centers and sub-network geometries: a social network analysis of multi-scalar energy networks. Geoforum, 64, 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McFarlane, C. (2010). The comparative city: knowledge, learning, urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 725–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MPA. (2011). Corporate plan 2012–2014. http://www.mauport.com/sites/default/files/public/corporate_plan_2012.pdf. Accessed 12 April 2019.
  39. Murray, M. J. (2011). City of extremes: the spatial politics of Johannesburg. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nijman, J. (2007). Introduction: comparative urbanism. Urban Geography, 28(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Notteboom, T. (2007). Container river services and gateway ports: similarities between the Yangtze river and the Rhine river. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 48(3), 330–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parnell, S., & Robinson, J. (2006). Development and urban policy: Johannesburg’s city development strategy. Urban Studies, 43(2), 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parnreiter, C. (2010). Global cities in global commodity chains: exploring the role of Mexico City in the geography of global economic governance. In B. Derudder & F. Witlox (Eds.), Commodity chains and world cities (pp. 43–64). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. Parnreiter, C. (2015). Managing and governing commodity chains: the role of producer service firms in the secondary global city of Hamburg. Die Erde, 146(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  45. Parnreiter, C., Haferburg, C., & Oßenbrügge, J. (2013). Shifting corporate geographies in global cities of the South: Mexico City and Johannesburg as case studies. Die Erde, 144(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  46. Phelps, N. A. (2017). Interplaces: an economic geography of the interurban and international economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Price, M., & Benton-Short, L. (Eds.). (2008). Migrants to the metropolis: the rise of immigrant gateway cities. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Republic of Mauritius. (2016). Three year strategic plan: 2017/18 to 2019/2020. http://budget.mof.govmu.org/budget2017-18/2017_183-YearPlan.pdf. Accessed 15 April 2019.
  49. Robbins, G. (2012). Mining FDI and urban economies in sub-Saharan Africa: exploring the possible linkages. Local Economy, 28(2), 158–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robinson, J. (2002). Global and world cities: a view from off the map. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(3), 531–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Robinson, J. (2006). Ordinary cities: between modernity and development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Rossi, E. C., Beaverstock, J. V., & Taylor, P. J. (2007). Transaction links through cities: ‘Decision cities’ and ‘service cities’. Geoforum, 38(4), 628–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Roy, A. (2009). The 21st century metropolis: new geographies of theory. Regional Studies, 43(6), 819–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scholvin, S. (2017). Das Tor nach Sub-Sahara Afrika?: Kapstadts Potenzial als Gateway City für den Öl- und Gassektor. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 61(2), 80–95.Google Scholar
  55. Scholvin, S. (2019). Rebalancing research on world cities: Mauritius as a gateway to sub-Saharan Africa. In S. Scholvin, A. Black, J. Revilla Diez & I. Turok (Eds.), Value chains in sub-Saharan Africa: challenges of integration into the global economy (pp. 205–220). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  56. Scholvin, S., Breul, M., & Revilla Diez, J. (2019). Revisiting gateway cities: connecting hubs in global networks to their hinterlands. Urban Geography, 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1585137.
  57. Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (2015). The nature of cities: the scope and limits of urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: a menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sigler, T. J. (2013). Relational cities: Doha, Panama City, and Dubai as 21st century entrepôts. Urban Geography, 34(5), 612–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Taylor, P. J., Catalano, G., & Walker, D. R. (2002a). Measurement of the world city network. Urban Studies, 39(13), 2367–2376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taylor, P. J., Catalano, G., & Walker, D. R. (2002b). Exploratory analysis of the world city network. Urban Studies, 39(13), 2377–2394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taylor, P. J., Walker, D. R. F., Catalano, G., & Hoyler, M. (2002c). Diversity and power in the world city network. Cities, 19(4), 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Toly, N., Bouteligier, S., Smith, G., & Gibson, B. (2012). New maps, new questions: global cities beyond the advanced producer and financial services sector. Globalizations, 9(2), 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. UN Habitat. (2018). The state of African cities 2018: the geography of African investment. https://unhabitat.org/books/the-state-of-african-cities-2018-the-geography-of-african-investment. Accessed 18 Aug 2019.
  65. Welman, L., & Ferreira, S. L. (2016). The co-evolution of Saldanha Bay (town and hinterland) and its port. Local Economy, 31(1–2), 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. World Bank. (2017). Doing business 2017: equal opportunity for all. http://www.doingbusiness.org/~/media/WBG/DoingBusiness/Documents/Annual-Reports/English/DB17-Report.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2019.
  67. World Economic Forum. (2017). The global competitiveness report 2017–2018. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2017-2018/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2017%E2%80%932018.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2019.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Economic and Cultural GeographyUniversity of HanoverHanoverGermany

Personalised recommendations