Exogenous factors of influence on exhaled breath analysis by ion-mobility spectrometry (MCC/IMS)
The interpretation of exhaled breath analysis needs to address to the influence of exogenous factors, especially to a transfer of confounding analytes by the test persons. A test person who was exposed to a disinfectant had exhaled breath analysis by MCC/IMS (Bioscout®) after different time intervals. Additionally, a new sampling method with inhalation of synthetic air before breath analysis was tested. After exposure to the disinfectant, 3-Pentanone monomer, 3-Pentanone dimer, Hexanal, 3-Pentanone trimer, 2-Propanamine, 1-Propanol, Benzene, Nonanal showed significantly higher intensities, in exhaled breath and air of the examination room, compared to the corresponding baseline measurements. Only one ingredient of the disinfectant (1-Propanol) was identical to the 8 analytes. Prolonging the time intervals between exposure and breath analysis showed a decrease of their intensities. However, the half-time of the decrease was different. The inhalation of synthetic air –more than consequently airing the examination room with fresh air –reduced the exogenous and also relevant endogenous analytes, leading to a reduction and even changing polarity of the alveolar gradient. The interpretation of exhaled breath needs further knowledge about the former residence of the proband and the likelihood and relevance of the inhalation of local, site-specific and confounding exogenous analytes by him. Their inhalation facilitates a transfer to the examination room and a detection of high concentrations in room air and exhaled breath, but also the exhalation of new analytes. This may lead to a misinterpretation of these analytes as endogenous resp. disease-specific ones.
KeywordsIon mobility spectrometry Multicapillary column Exhaled breath analysis Exogenous analytes Disinfectant
The authors thank Mrs. B. Obertrifter, Lung Clinic Hemer, for her valuable technical assistance in MCC/IMS studies.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
JIBB declared to be an employee of a company producing spectrometers used. There are no other conflicts of interest.
- 4.Kushch I, Schwarz K, Schwentner L, Baumann B, Dzien A, Schmid A, Unterkofler K, Gastl G, Spaněl P, Smith D, Amann A (2008) Compounds enhanced in a mass spectrometric profile of smokers’ exhaled breath versus nonsmokers as determined in a pilot study using PTR-MS. J Breath Res 2(2):026002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Baumbach JI, Vautz W, Ruzsanyi V, Freitag L (2005) Metabolites in human breath: ion mobility spectrometers as diagnostic tools for lung diseases. In: Ammann A, Smith D (eds) Breath analysis for clinical diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring. World Scientific Publishing Co. Ptd. Ltd, Singapore, pp 53–66Google Scholar
- 13.Westhoff M, Litterst P, Freitag L, Baumbach JI (2007) Ion mobility spectrometry in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis: results of a feasibility study. J Physiol Pharmacol 58:739–751Google Scholar
- 19.Eiceman GA, Karpas Z (1994) Ion mobility spectrometry. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Ann Arbor, London, Tokyo, pp 1–228Google Scholar
- 22.Westhoff M, Rickermann M, Franieck E, Littterst P, Baumbach JI (2019) Time series of indoor analytes and influence of exogenous factors on interpretation of breath analysis using ion mobility spectrometry (MCC/IMS). Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom 22 (1):39–49Google Scholar
- 23.Horváth I, Barnes PJ, Loukides S, Sterk PJ, Högman M, Olin AC, Amann A, Antus B, Baraldi E, Bikov A, Boots AW, Bos LD, Brinkman P, Bucca C, Carpagnano GE, Corradi M, Cristescu S, de Jongste JC, Dinh-Xuan AT, Dompeling E, Fens N, Fowler S, Hohlfeld JM, Holz O, Jöbsis Q, Van De Kant K, Knobel HH, Kostikas K, Lehtimäki L, Lundberg J, Montuschi P, Van Muylem A, Pennazza G, Reinhold P, Ricciardolo FLM, Rosias P, Santonico M, van der Schee MP, van Schooten FJ, Spanevello A, Tonia T, Vink TJ (2017) A European Respiratory Society technical standard: exhaled biomarkers in lung disease. Eur Respir J 49(4):1600965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Baumbach JI (2006) Process analysis using ion mobility spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 384(1):059–1070Google Scholar
- 34.Capone S, Tufariello M, Forleo A, Longo V, Giampetruzzi L, Radogna AV, Casino F, Siciliano P (2018) Chromatographic analysis of VOC patterns in exhaled breath from smokers and nonsmokers. Biomed Chromatogr 32:e4132Google Scholar
- 35.Gaida A, Holz O, Nell C, Schuchardt S, Lavae-Mokhtari B, Kruse L, Boas U, Langejuergen J, Allers M, Zimmermann S, Vogelmeier C, Koczulla AR, Hohlfeld JM (2016 Apr 15) A dual center study to compare breath volatile organic compounds from smokers and non-smokers with and without COPD. J Breath Res. 10(2):026006CrossRefGoogle Scholar