Advertisement

Exploring the Cost of ‘Ageing in Place’: Expenditures of Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Belgium

  • Bram Fret
  • Britt Mondelaers
  • Liesbeth De Donder
  • Lise Switsers
  • An-Sofie Smetcoren
  • Dominique Verté
  • the D-SCOPE consortium
Article

Abstract

This paper aims to give an overview of the different sources of income and the expenditures of community-dwelling older adults and to what extent they can make ends meet to explore the affordability of care and support at home. Despite research on the affordability of residential care, evidence on the cost of ‘ageing in place’ is still missing. 173 questionnaires were gathered within a non-random sample of community-dwelling older adults (60+). Both frequencies and bivariate tests (to explore whether there are certain risk groups with low incomes and high expenditures) were performed on the data. Results indicate the variety of income sources, the necessity of financial compensations to make ends meet and that especially older women and older tenants are at risk for facing financial difficulties. Also, this research indicates that ‘ageing in place’, especially for older adults with care needs, is not always affordable and can be a challenge within our ageing society.

Keywords

Ageing in place Income Expenditures Financial accessibility Older adults 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank ‘DKV’ for the financial support of the study as well as ‘Kenniscentrum Wonen Welzijn en Zorg’ and ‘Zorgbedrijf Antwerpen’ for the coordination of the ‘Active Caring Community’ project platform.

The D-SCOPE consortium is an international research consortium composed of researchers from Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium (dr. An-Sofie Smetcoren, dr. Sarah Dury, prof. dr. Liesbeth De Donder, prof. dr. Eva Dierckx, Deborah Lambotte, Bram Fret, Daan Duppen, prof. dr. Martinus Kardol, prof. dr. Dominique Verté); College University Ghent, Belgium (Lieve Hoeyberghs, prof. dr. Nico De Witte); Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium (Ellen De Roeck, prof. dr. Sebastiaan Engelborghs, prof. dr. Peter Paul De Deyn); Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium (Michaël Van der Elst, prof. dr. Jan De Lepeleire, prof. dr. Birgitte Schoenmakers) and Maastricht University, The Netherlands (Anne van der Vorst, prof. dr. Rixt Zijlstra, prof. dr. Gertrudis Kempen, prof. dr. Jos Schols).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

None.

Informed Consent

As there is no person or personal data appearing in the paper, there is no one from whom permission should be obtained in order to publish personal data.

Ethical Treatment of Experimental Subjects (Animal and Human)

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Addae-Dapaah, K., & Wong, G. K. M. (2001). Housing and the elderly in Singapore–financial and quality of life implications of ageing in place. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16(2), 153–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anttonen, A., & Karsio, O. (2016). Eldercare service redesign in Finland: Deinstitutionalization of long-term care. Journal of Social Service Research, 42(2), 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baarda, B., Bakker, E., Van der Hulst, M., Fischer, T., Julsing, M., & van Vianen, R. (2012). Basisboek methoden en technieken: kwantitatief praktijkgericht onderzoek op wetenschappelijke basis. Groningen [etc.]: Noordhoff Uitgevers.Google Scholar
  4. Balkrishnan, R., Rajagopalan, R., Camacho, F. T., Huston, S. A., Murray, F. T., & Anderson, R. T. (2003). Predictors of medication adherence and associated health care costs in an older population with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A longitudinal cohort study. Clinical Therapeutics, 25(11), 2958–2971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belgisch Staatsblad (2017). Wet tot wijziging van de wet van 22 maart 2001 tot instelling van een inkomensgarantie voor ouderen. http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi_loi/change_lg.pl?language=nl&la=N&table_name=wet&cn=2017012706. Accessed 8 April 2018.
  6. Berghman, D. M., Donvil, N., & Peeters, E. H. (2016). Sociale bijstand als indicator van armoede bij ouderen. Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Sociale Zekerheid, 16(2), 189–215.Google Scholar
  7. Bradbury, B. (2010). Asset rich, but income poor: Australian housing wealth and retirement in an international context. http://library.bsl.org.au/jspui/bitstream/1/2180/1/Asset_rich_but_income_poor.pdf. Accessed 7 juni 2018.
  8. Bronselaer, J., Vandezande, V., Vanden Boer, L., & Demeyer, B. (2016). Sporen naar duurzame mantelzorg. Hoe perspectief bieden aan mantelzorgers. Brussel: Departement Welzijn, Volksgezondheid en Gezin, 1-405.Google Scholar
  9. Cès, S., Flusin, D., Schmitz, O., Lambert, A. S., Pauwen, N., & Macq, J. (2016). Mantelzorgers van thuiswonende ouderen in België: een cruciale en complexe rol (pp. 1–146). Koning Boudewijnstichting: Brussel.Google Scholar
  10. Chappell, N. L., Dlitt, B. H., Hollander, M. J., Miller, J. A., & McWilliam, C. (2004). Comparative costs of home care and residential care. The Gerontologist, 44(3), 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Claessens, E., Vertriest, S., Vandijck, D. & Petrovic, M. (2011). Gezondheidseconomische evaluatie van mantelzorg bij (zwaar) zorgafhankelijke ouderen in de thuiszorg. Gent: Universiteit Gent.Google Scholar
  12. Conceptnota Vlaamse Sociale Bescherming (2016). Brussel: Vlaamse Gemeenschap, 1–26.Google Scholar
  13. Costa-Font, J., Elvira, D., & Mascarilla-Miró, O. (2009). Ageing in place'? Exploring elderly people's housing preferences in Spain. Urban Studies, 46(2), 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davey, J. (2006). "Ageing in place": The views of older homeowners on maintenance, renovation and adaptation. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 27, 128.Google Scholar
  15. De Almeida Mello, J., Declercq, A., Cès, S., Van Durme, T., Van Audenhove, C., & Macq, J. (2016). Exploring home care interventions for frail older people in Belgium: A comparative effectiveness study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 64(11), 2251–2256.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Witte, K. (2018). De Grote pensioenroof. En het plan om ons pensioen terug te winnen. Berchem: EPO, 1–296.Google Scholar
  17. Degavre, F., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Care as a social construct. The case of home care workers in contemporary Belgium.Google Scholar
  18. Desmedt, M., Bergs, J., Vertriest, S., Hellings, J., Petrovic, M., & Vandijck, D. (2016). De economische waarde van mantelzorg en de financiële impact ervan op de ziekteverzekering. Hasselt: University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dewilde, C., & Raeymaeckers, P. (2008). The trade-off between home-ownership and pensions: Individual and institutional determinants of old-age poverty. Ageing & Society, 28(6), 805–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doling, J., & Ronald, R. (2010). Home ownership and asset-based welfare. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 25(2), 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dumont, D. (2015). De sociale zekerheid en de zesde staatshervorming: voorgeschiedenis en algemene beschouwingen. Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Sociale Zekerheid, 15(2), 175–228.Google Scholar
  22. Dury, S. (2018). Dynamics in motivations and reasons to quit in a care Bank: A qualitative study in Belgium. European Journal of Ageing, 1–10.Google Scholar
  23. Dury, S., De Roeck, E., Duppen, D., Fret, B., Hoeyberghs, L., Lambotte, D., Van der Elst, M., van der Vorst, A., Schols, J., Kempen, G., Zijlstra, G. A. R., De Lepeleire, J., Schoenmakers, B., Kardol, T., De Witte, N., Verté, D., De Donder, L., De Deyn, P. P., Engelborghs, S., Smetcoren, A., & Dierckx, E. (2016). Identifying frailty risk profiles home of dwelling older people: Focus on sociodemographic and socio-economic characteristics. Aging & Mental Health, 7, 1–9.Google Scholar
  24. Eeman, L., & Van Regenmortel, T. (2013). Automatische rechtentoekenning en proactief handelen. Een verkenning op lokaal niveau met bijzondere aandacht voor mensen met een laag inkomen. VLAS-Studies, 4, 1–45.Google Scholar
  25. Elchardus, M. (2017). Thuiszorg (pp. 1–34). TOR: Onderzoek in opdracht van de socialistische mutualiteit. VUB.Google Scholar
  26. European Commission (2017). State of Healh in the EU Belgium. Country Health Profile 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/state/docs/chp_be_english.pdf. Accessed 6 April 2018.
  27. European Hospital and Healthcare Federation (2015). Out-of-pocket payments in healthcare systems in the European Union. http://www.hope.be/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/99_2015_HOPE-REPORT_Out-of-pocket-payments-in-healthcare-systems-in-the-European-Union.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2018.
  28. Eurostat (2017). Income distribution statistics. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Income_distribution_statistics#Income_inequalities. Accessed 26 February 2018.
  29. Eurostat (2018a). At-risk-of-poverty rate of older people by detailed age group - EU-SILC survey. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/refreshTableAction.do?tab=table&plugin=1&pcode=tespn050&language=en. Accessed 7 June 2018.
  30. Eurostat (2018b). Mean and median income by age and sex - EU-SILC survey. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do. Accessed 28 May 2018.
  31. Evans, D., Hsu, J., & Boerma, T. (2013). Universal health coverage and universal access. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation, 91(8), 546–546A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Federale Pensioendienst (2018). De IGO. http://www.onprvp.fgov.be/NL/futur/IGO/amounts/paginas/default.aspx. Accessed 8 April 2018.
  33. Fret, B., Lambotte, D., Van Regenmortel, S., Dury, S., De Witte, N., Dierckx, E., De Donder, L., & Verté, D. (2017). Socio-demographic, socio-economic and health need differences between types of care use in community-dwelling older adults. International Journal of Care and Caring, 1(3), 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goedemé, T., Van Gestel, R., Janssens, J., Lefevere, E., Lemkens, R., & De Spiegeleer, T. (2017). De proactieve flux: een succesvolle manier om de opname van de verhoogde tegemoetkoming te verbeteren. CM-Informatie, 270, 19–25.Google Scholar
  35. Grabowski, D. C. (2006). The cost-effectiveness of noninstitutional long-term care services: Review and synthesis of the most recent evidence. Medical Care Research and Review, 63(1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haitz, N. (2015). Old-age poverty in OECD countries and the issue of gender pension gaps. DICE Report, 13(2), 73.Google Scholar
  37. Hassink, J., Hulsink, W., & Grin, J. (2014). Farming with care: The evolution of care farming in the Netherlands. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 68, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hernanz, V., Malherbet, F., & Pellizzari, M. (2004). Take-up of welfare benefits in OECD countries: A review of the evidence. In Social, employment and migration working papers 17. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  39. Heylen, K., & Winters, S. (2009). Betaalbaarheid van wonen in Vlaanderen: De budgetbenadering. Heverlee: Steunpunt Ruimte en Wonen.Google Scholar
  40. Holly A, Lamiraud K, Chevrou-Severac H, & Yalcin T. (2005). Out-of-pocket payments for health care expenditures. In: Börsch-Supan a, Brugiavini a, Jürges H et al. eds. Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. First Results from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. Mannheim: Mannheim research Institute for the Economics of aging (MEA), 126–132.Google Scholar
  41. Johri, M., Beland, F., & Bergman, H. (2003). International experiments in integrated care for the elderly: A synthesis of the evidence. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18(3), 222–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Katon, W. J., Lin, E., Russo, J., & Unützer, J. (2003). Increased medical costs of a population-based sample of depressed elderly patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(9), 897–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kok, L., Berden, C., & Sadiraj, K. (2015). Costs and benefits of home care for the elderly versus residential care: A comparison using propensity scores. The European Journal of Health Economics, 16(2), 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Koning Boudewijnstichting (2017). Kwetsbare ouderen thuis ondersteunen. Lokale krachten bundelen. https://www.kbs-frb.be/nl/Activities/Publications/2017/20170305pp. Accessed 8 April 2018.
  45. Kubalčíková, K., & Havlíková, J. (2016). Current developments in social care services for older adults in the Czech Republic: Trends towards deinstitutionalization and marketization. Journal of Social Service Research, 42(2), 180–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lehnert, T., Heider, D., Leicht, H., Heinrich, S., Corrieri, S., Luppa, M., Riedel-Heller, S., & König, H. H. (2011). Health care utilization and costs of elderly persons with multiple chronic conditions. Medical Care Research and Review, 68(4), 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lei, P., Feng, Z., & Wu, Z. (2016). The availability and affordability of long-term care for disabled older people in China: The issues related to inequalities in social security benefits. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 67, 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lubitz, J., Cai, L., Kramarow, E., & Lentzner, H. (2003). Health, life expectancy, and health care spending among the elderly. New England Journal of Medicine, 349(11), 1048–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marziale, M. (2016). Universal access to health and universal health coverage: Nursing contributions. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 24(0), e2667.Google Scholar
  50. Means, R. (2007). Safe as houses? Ageing in place and vulnerable older people in the UK. Social Policy & Administration, 41(1), 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mestheneos, E. (2011). Ageing in place in the European Union. Global Ageing, 7(2), 17–24.Google Scholar
  52. OECD (2015). Country Note: How does health spending in Belgium compare? https://www.oecd.org/belgium/Country-Note-BELGIUM-OECD-Health-Statistics-2015.pdf. Accessed 8 April 2018.
  53. Oris, M., Gabriel, R., Ritschard, G., & Kliegel, M. (2017). Long lives and old age poverty: Social stratification and life-course institutionalization in Switzerland. Research in Human Development, 14(1), 68–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pacolet, J., Bouten, R., Lanoye, H., & Versieck, K. (2000). Social protection for dependency in old age. A study of the fifteen EU member states and Norway. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  55. Pacolet, J., Luyten, J., Op de Beeck, L., De Wispelaere, F., De Coninck, A., & Kuppens, S. (2018). Noodzaak en modaliteiten van een duurzaam systeem van prijscontrole voor de residentiële ouderenvoorzieningen in Vlaanderen. Leuven: HIVA en LIGB.Google Scholar
  56. Randel, J., German, T., Ewing, D. (2000). The ageing and development report. London: Routledge. Royal Decree nr. 78 of 10 November 1967 considering the execution of care professions, Federal Government: Brussels.Google Scholar
  57. Schöllgen, I., Huxhold, O., & Tesch-Römer, C. (2010). Socioeconomic status and health in the second half of life: Findings from the German ageing survey. European Journal of Ageing, 7(1), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smetcoren, A. (2016). I'm not leaving!? Critical perspectives on 'ageing in place'. (published doctoral dissertation Vrije Universiteit Brussel). Brussels: University press.Google Scholar
  59. Smetcoren, A. S., Dury, S., De Donder, L., De Witte, N., Van Regenmortel, S., Kardol, M. J. M., & Verte, D. (2014). Denken over later? Attitudes van ouderen ten opzichte van verschillende woonvormen in Vlaanderen. Ruimte & Maatschappij, 6(12), 14–38.Google Scholar
  60. Smetcoren, A. S., De Donder, L., Van Regenmortel, S., Dury, S., De Witte, N., Kardol, M. J. M., & Verte, D. (2015). Woonsituatie van ouderen in Vlaanderen: detecteren van kwetsbare groepen. In P. De Decker, B. Meeus, I. Pannecoucke, E. Schillebeeckx, J. Verstraete, & E. E. Volckaert (Eds.), Woonnood in Vlaanderen: Feiten/Mythen/Voorstellen (pp. 183–194). Antwerpen - Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
  61. Smetcoren, A., De Donder, L., Duppen, D., De Witte, N., Vanmechelen, O. and Verté, D. (2018). Towards an ‘active caring community’ in Brussels. In: T. Buffel, ed. Age-friendly cities and communities: A global perspective, 1st ed. Bristol: Policy Press at the University of Bristol, 97–118.Google Scholar
  62. Socialistische Mutualiteiten (2017). Rusthuisbarometer. https://www.bondmoyson.be/SiteCollectionDocuments/Pers%20en%20studiedienst/300/Rusthuisbarometer_december2017.pdf. Accessed 8 April 2018.
  63. Statbel (2017). Armoede-indicatoren in België in 2016 (EU-SILC). https://statbel.fgov.be/nl/themas/huishoudens/armoede-en-levensomstandigheden/armoederisico#news. Accessed 6 April 2018.
  64. Van den Bosch, K. (2016). Measuring social protection for older people with long-term care needs in Belgium. A report on the completion of an OECD data collection questionnaire. https://www.plan.be/admin/uploaded/201609011418490.REP_LTCOECD062016_11305.pdf. Accessed 1 Juni 2018.
  65. Van der Gucht, A. (2016). Wat betekent goede zorg in Vlaanderen anno 2016? Geron, 18(4), 12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Van Durme, T., Schmitz, O., Cès, S., Anthierens, S., Maggi, P., Delye, S., Mello De Almeida, J., Declercq, A., Macq, J., Remmen, R., & Aujoulat, I. (2015). A comprehensive grid to evaluate case management’s expected effectiveness for community-dwelling frail older people: Results from a multiple, embedded case study. BMC Geriatrics, 15(1), 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Verpoorten, R. (2015). The packaging puzzle: An investigation into the Income and Care Packages of the Belgian Elderly Population. (published doctoral dissertation Katholieke Universiteit Leuven). Leuven: KULeuven.Google Scholar
  68. Vlaams Agentschap Zorg & Gezondheid (2018). Hoeveel bedraagt de gemiddelde dagprijs in uw woonzorgcentrum? Meting 2017. https://www.zorg-en-gezondheid.be/dagprijzen. Accessed 7 June 2018.
  69. Voorontwerp Vlaams Huurdecreet (2017). Voorontwerp van decreet houdende bepalingen betreffende de huur van voor bewoning bestemde goederen of delen ervan. Brussel: Vlaamse Gemeenschap.Google Scholar
  70. WHO. (2015). World report on ageing and health. Geneva: WHO press.Google Scholar
  71. Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., & Allen, R. E. (2012). The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Woolham, J., Daly, G., Sparks, T., Ritters, K., & Steils, N. (2017). Do direct payments improve outcomes for older people who receive social care? Differences in outcome between people aged 75+ who have a managed personal budget or a direct payment. Ageing & Society, 37(5), 961–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Woonzorgdecreet (2009). Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering betreffende de programmatie, de erkenningsvoorwaarden en de subsidieregeling voor woonzorgvoorzieningen en verenigingen van gebruikers en mantelzorgers. Brussel: Vlaamse Gemeenschap.Google Scholar
  74. Wu, E. Q., Patel, P. A., Yu, A. P., Mody, R. R., Cahill, K. E., Tang, J., & Krishnan, E. (2008). Disease-related and all-cause health care costs of elderly patients with gout. Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy, 14(2), 164–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational SciencesVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Wit-Gele Kruis van Vlaanderen vzwBrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Master in Adult Educational SciencesBrusselsBelgium
  4. 4.Research Foundation Flanders (FWO)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations