Beyond the Meaning Given. The Meaning as Explanandum
The paper starts from the recognition of Bruner’s contribution to the development of psychological science. It is claimed here that to proceed in that direction requires the building of an analytical notion of meaning. This analytical notion should distinguish between meaning-making and sensemaking, namely between the processes of elaboration and use of meaning (meaning-making) and the processes that makes the meaning emerge to be lived as psychological reality (sense-making). In order to discuss this distinction, two main issues are addressed – the limit of the hypostatized view of meaning and the dynamics of presentification through which meaning is endowed with value of life. These two issues are complementary – together they push psychology to search for a theoretical and methodological framework where meaning can be investigated as an emergent psychological phenomenon, and not only taken for granted as a premise.
KeywordsSense-making Meaning making
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The Author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.
- Albertazzi, L., Jacquette, D., & Poli, R. (2001). Meinong in his and our times. In L. Albertazzi, D. Jacquette, & R. Poli (Eds.), The school of Alexius Meinong (pp. 3–48). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Brentano, F. (1995). In L. L. McAlister (Ed.), Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. London, Routledge: (Original work published 1874).Google Scholar
- Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Chaudhary, N., & Pilli, P. (2019). Beyond the information given: A commentary. Integrative Psychological and Behiavioral Science, 53, in press.Google Scholar
- de Saussure, F. (1977) Course in General Linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). Glasgow: Fontana/Collins (Original work published in 1916).Google Scholar
- Eco, U. (1975). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Fini, V., & Salvatore, S. (in press). The fuel and the engine. A general semio-cultural psychological framework for social intervention. In S. Schliewe, N. Chaudhary, & P. Marsico (Eds.), Cultural Psychology of Intervention in the Globalized World. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Graneist, A., & Habermas, T. (2019). Beyond the text given: Studying the scaffolding of narrative emotion regulation as a contribution to Bruner and Feldman’s cultural cognitive developmental psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behiavioral Science, 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-9474-x.
- Grazzani, I., & Brockmeier, J. (2019). Language games and social cognition: Revisiting Bruner. Integrative Psychological and Behiavioral Science, 53, in press.Google Scholar
- Iannaccone, I., Perret-Clermont, N., & Convertini, J. (2019). Children as investigators of Brunerian “Possible worlds”. The role of narrative scenarios in children’s argumentative thinking. Integrative Psychological and Behiavioral Science, 53, in press.Google Scholar
- Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Kanizsa, G. (1955). Margini quasi-percettivi in campi con stimolazione omogenea [Quasi-perceptual contours in homogeneously stimulated fields]. Rivista di Psicologia, 49(1), 7–30.Google Scholar
- Moscovici, S. (1961/1976). La psychanalyse son image et son public. Etude sur la répresentation sociale de la psychanalyse. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France [English edition by G. Duveen (2008), Psychoanalysis. Its Image and Its Public. Cambridge: Polity Press].Google Scholar
- Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman & Co..Google Scholar
- Peirce, C. S. (1932). On Sign. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Volume II). Cambridge: Harvard University Press [Original version: 1987].Google Scholar
- Salvatore, S. (2012). Social life of the sign: Sensemaking in society. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 241–254). Oxford: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
- Salvatore, S. (2016a). Psychology in black and white. The project of a theory-driven science. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Salvatore, S. (2018). Culture as dynamics of sense-making. A semiotic and embodied framework for socio-cultural psychology. In Cambridge handbook of culture & psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge Press University.Google Scholar
- Salvatore, S., & Venuleo, C. (2013). Field dependency and contingency in the modelling of sensemaking. Papers on Social Representation [On Line Journal], 22(2), 21.1–21.41.Google Scholar
- Sanford, A. J. (1987). The mind of man. Models of human understanding. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
- Schank, R., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Smorti, A., & Fioretti, C. (2019). Beyond the anomaly: where Piaget and Bruner meet. Integrative Psychological and Behiavioral Science, 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-9477-7.
- Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell (Original work published in 1953).Google Scholar