Advertisement

Press Ideology as an Epistemological Connector between Framing Theory and Social Representations Theory: An Analysis of Violence and Drug Trafficking in the Mexican Press

  • Hiram Reyes-SosaEmail author
  • Maider Larrañaga Egilegor
  • Tânia Dos Santos
  • Luisa Perez-Marin
  • Francisco Alvarez-Montero
Regular Article
  • 125 Downloads

Abstract

The present paper explores the advantages of using framing theory, social representations theory and differences in ideology to analyze polarized issues in the press. Framing uncovers the structure/format of news articles and social representations explores their meanings. These two theoretical positions are connected through the concept of ideology – a set of beliefs that shape position taking regarding social issues. Using this integrated framework, we will analyze the highly polarized topic of violence and drug trafficking in two ideologically different newspapers in Sinaloa, Mexico - Noroeste (journalistic ideology) and El Debate (elite ideology) (total N = 547 articles). This will be accomplished using three steps – a descriptive analysis, application of the framing scale and submitting the articles to ALCESTE software. The results show differences in framing and social representations of violence and drug trafficking according to ideology. Each newspaper presented different news frames (journalistic - attribution of responsibility and conflict frames; elite - human-interest and morality frames). However, at the level of representations (content) there were ideological differences in the representation of violence but not of drug trafficking, suggesting a common element in these representations, beyond ideological differences. These findings contribute to (1) the clarification of the concept used and (2) towards an analytical framework of press analysis - analyzing format and content and considering differences in press ideology.

Keywords

Framing Social representations Ideology Violence Drug trafficking 

Notes

Funding

This research was supported by grants from Conacyt (390390).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abric, J.C. (2001). Prácticas y Representaciones Sociales. México: Ediciones Coyoacan.Google Scholar
  2. Akhavan-Majid, R., & Ramaprasad, J. (1998). Framing and ideology: A comparative analysis of U.S and Chinese newspaper coverage of the fourth United Nations conference on woman and the NGO forum. Mass Communication & Society, 1(3), 131–152.Google Scholar
  3. An, S. K., & Gower, K. K. (2009). How do the news media frame crises? A content analysis of crisis news coverage. Public Relations Review, 35(2), 107–112.Google Scholar
  4. Ardevol-Abreu, A. (2015). Framing countries in humanitarian crisis. A deductive content analysis of press news. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodistico, 21(2), 705–722.Google Scholar
  5. Ariño, A. (1997). Ideología, discursos y dominación. Revista Española de Investigación Sociológicas, 79, 197–220.Google Scholar
  6. Astorga, L. 2003, México, Colombia y las drogas ilegales. Variaciones sobre un mismo tema’, conferencia dictada en la VIII Cátedra Anual de Historia Ernesto Restrepo Tirado, Análisis histórico del narcotráfico en Colombia, Bogotá, 29 al 31 de octubre de 2003.Google Scholar
  7. Bailey, J., & Taylor, M. (2009). Evade, corrupt or confront? Organized crime and the state in Brazil and Mexico. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 1(2), 3–29.Google Scholar
  8. Banchs, M. A. (2000). Aproximaciones Procesuales y Estructurales al estudio de las Representaciones Sociales. Papers on Social Representations, 9, 3.1.3.15.Google Scholar
  9. Bateson, G. (1955). A theory of play and fantasy. Psychiatric Research Reports, 2, 39–51.Google Scholar
  10. Bauer, M. W. (2000). Science in the media as cultural indicator: Contextualizing surveys with media analysis. In M. Dierkes & C. Von Grote (Eds.), Between understanding and trust: The public, science and technology (pp. 157–178). Amsterdam: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Bell, D. (1965). The end of ideology: On the exhaustion of political ideas. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ben-Asher, S. (2003). Hegemonic, emancipated and polemic social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 12, 6.1–6.12.Google Scholar
  13. Brambila, J. A. (2014). Comunicación en la guerra contra el narcotráfico. La estrategia publicitaria de la SEDENA (2007-2011). CONfines, 10(20), 9–33.Google Scholar
  14. Bravo, J. (2009). La comunicación gubernamental de Vicente Fox. El Cotidiano, 155, 43–55.Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, H., & Hansen, T. (2014). Is narco violence in Mexico terrorism? Bulletin of Latin American Research, 33(2), 158–173.  https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carreon, G. J., & De La Cruz, P. I. (2012). La lucha actual contra la delincuencia organizada en Mexico. Revista Castellano-Manchega de Ciencias sociales, 14, 59–74.Google Scholar
  17. Ceron, A., Curini, L., & Lacus, S. (2016). First and second level agenda-setting in the twitter-sphere. An application to the Italian political debate. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(2)159–174.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160266.Google Scholar
  18. Cerrato, J., & Palmonari, A. (2007). Representaciones sociales y psicología social. Comportamientos, globalización y posmodernidad. Promolibro: España.Google Scholar
  19. Chiapello, E. (2003). Reconciling the two principal meanings of the notion of ideology: The example of the concept of the ‘spirit of capitalism’. European Journal of Social Theory, 6(2), 155–171.Google Scholar
  20. Cho, S. H., & Gower, K. K. (2006). Framing effect on the public’s response to crisis: Human frames and crisis type influencing responsibility and blame. Public Relations Review, 32(5), 420.422.Google Scholar
  21. Cobertta, P., Cavazza, N., & Roccato, M. (2009). Between ideology and social representations. Four theses plus (a new) one on the relevance and the meaning. European Journal of Political Research, 48(5), 622–641.Google Scholar
  22. Combate al narco dispara delitos. (2008, 25 diciembre). Noroeste, pp. 14.Google Scholar
  23. Cordova, N. (2011). La Narcocultura: Simbologia de la Transgresión, El poder y La muerte. Sinaloa leyenda negra. México: UAS.Google Scholar
  24. Correa-Cabrera, G. (2006). The spectacle of drug violence: American public discourse, media, and border enforcement in the Texas-Tamaulipas border region during drug war times. Norteamérica CISAN-UNAM, 7(2), 199–220.Google Scholar
  25. Crimen organizado dueño de la ciudad. (2008, 10 diciembre). Noroeste, pp. 9.Google Scholar
  26. Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  27. De Alba, M. (2004). El Método ALCESTE y su Aplicación al Estudio de las representaciones Sociales del Espacio Urbano: El Caso de la Ciudad de México. Papers on Social Representations, 13, 1.1–1.20.Google Scholar
  28. De Vreese, C. (2003). Framing Europe: Television news and European integration. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. De Vreese, C., Peter, J., & Semetko, H. (2001). Framing politics at the launch of the euro: A croos-national Comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication, 18(2), 107–122.  https://doi.org/10.1080/105846001750322934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Doise, W., & Staerkle, C. (2002). From social to political psychology: The societal approach. In K. Monroe (Ed.), Political psychology (pp. 131–173). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Doise, W. (2013). Social psychology and social change. Papers on Social Representations, 22, 7.1–7.22.Google Scholar
  32. Ejercito vs narcotrafico: causa perdida. (2000, 12 septiembre). Noroeste, pp. 2.Google Scholar
  33. Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.Google Scholar
  34. Escalante, F. (2011). Homicidios 2008–2009: La muerte tiene permiso. Recuperado de: http://www.nexos.com.mx/?p=14089.ç. Accessed 1 Jan 2011.
  35. Farah, A. (2011). Attitudes and social representation. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1593–1597.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gelado-Marcos, R. (2009). La dependencia de la prensa Española hacia las agencias de noticias. Comunicación y Sociedad, 23(2), 243–275.Google Scholar
  37. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Guimelli, C., & Rouquette, M. L. (2004). Etude de la relation d’antonymie entre deux objets de representation sociale: la securite vs. l’insecurite des biens et des personnes. Psychologie & Société, 4(1), 71–87.Google Scholar
  39. Hall, S. (1996). The problem of ideology: Marxism without guarantees. In D. Morley & K. H. Chen (Eds.), Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies (pp. 25–46). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Höijer, B. (2011). Social representations theory: A new theory for media research. Nordicom Review, 32(2), 3–16.Google Scholar
  41. Howarth, C. (2014). Connecting social representations, identity and ideology. Reflections on a London riot. Papers on Social Representations, 16(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  42. Idoyaga, N., Valencia, J., Gil de Montes, L., & Ortiz, G. (2012). Efectos del Framing y representaciones sociales de epidemias sanitarias: El Caso de la Gripe A. Escritos de Psicología (Internet), 5(3), 31–42.  https://doi.org/10.5231/psy.writ.2012.0211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Illia, L., Sonpar, K., & Bauer, M. W. (2014). Applying co-occurrence text analysis with ALCESTE to studies of impression management. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 352–372.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00842.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia. (2013). Defunciones por homicidio. México: INEGI. Recuperado de http://www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/olap/proyectos/bd/continuas/mortalidad/defuncioneshom.asp?s=est. Accessed 10 Mar 2013.
  45. Iyengar, S. (1990). Framing responsability for political issues: The case of poverty. Political Behavior, 12, 19–40.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Knapp, E., Suárez, M. Y., & Mesa, M. (2003). Aspectos teóricos y epistemológicos de la categoría representación social. Revista Cubana de Psicología., 20, 23–34.Google Scholar
  47. Klein, O., & Licata, K. (2003). When group representations serve social change: The speeches of Patrice Lumumba during the Congolese decolonization. British Journal of Social Psychological, 42(4), 571–593.  https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603322595284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lawson, C., & McCANN, J. (2004). Television news, Mexico’s 2000 elections and media effects in emerging democracies. British Journal of Political Sciences, 35, 1–30.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S00070123405000013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lawson, C. (2000). Mexico’s unfinished transition: Democratization and authoritarian enclaves in Mexico. Mexican Studies, 16(2), 267–287.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1052198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lecheler, S., & De Vreese, C. (2011). Getting real: The duration of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 959–983.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01580.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Levin-Rozalis, M., Bar-On, N., & Hartaf, H. (2003). The structural process of the social representations of violence abusive men. Culture & Psychology, 9(4), 361–382.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X0394003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lo Monaco, G., & Guimelli, C. (2011). Hegemonic and polemical beliefs: Culture and consumption in the social representation of wine. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 237–250.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. McCombs, M., & Ghanem, S. (2001). The convergence of agenda-setting and framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 67–81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  54. Martinez, S. J. (2012). Suplicios, excesos y nota roja: elementos para pensar la violencia como acto significativo, tesis maestría. Ciudad de Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico.Google Scholar
  55. Matthes, J., & Kohring, M. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 258–279.Google Scholar
  56. Montoya, E. A. (2013). El periodismo y la sociabilidad política en el norte de Sinaloa: El Debate y sus vínculos con el poder político local durante los años cuarenta, tesis maestría. Culiacán, Sinaloa: Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa.Google Scholar
  57. Morales, C. (2011). La guerra contra el narcotrafico en Mexico. Debilidad del Estado, origen local y fracaso de una estrategia. Revista de ciencias sociales, 50, 1–35.Google Scholar
  58. Moscovici, S., & Duveen, G. (2000). Social representation. Explorations in social psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  59. Moscovici, S. (2001). Pourquoi l’etude des representations sociales en psychologie? Psychologie et Société, 4(4), 7–27.Google Scholar
  60. Muñiz, C., & Ramirez, J. (2015). Los empresarios frente al narcotrafico en Mexico. Tratamiento informativo de las reacciones empresariales ante situaciones de violencia e inseguridad. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 21(1), 437–453.  https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_ESMP.2015.v21.n1.49104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Neuman, W. R., Just, M. R., & Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  62. Nixon, B. (2011). The ideology of uncritical U. S. journalism: Its political-professional and political-economic roots. Medijska Istrazivanja, 17(1–2), 141–162.Google Scholar
  63. Paez, D. (1991). Pensamiento, individuo y sociedad. Cognición y representación social. Madrid: Editorial Fundamento.Google Scholar
  64. Pan, P. L., Meng, J., & Zhou, S. (2010). Morality or equality? Ideological framing in news coverage of gay marriage legitimization. The Social Science Journal, 47(3), 630–645.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2010.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pardo, N. G. (2007). Niveles de organización del significado en el discurso. Discurso y Sociedad, 1, 85–115.Google Scholar
  66. Phail, E. M. (2010). Television y violencia. Revista Razón y Palabra, 73, 1–28.Google Scholar
  67. Rateau, P., Ernst-Vintila, A., & Delouvée, S. (2013). Una modelización del pensamineto social. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades., 23(1), 41–61.Google Scholar
  68. Reinert, M. (1996). Alceste (Version 3.0). Toulouse: Images.Google Scholar
  69. Reyes-Sosa, H. (2016). La relación entre el narcotráfico y la violencia en México: prácticas y discursos cotidianos, tesis doctoral. Donostia, San Sebastián: Universidad del País Vasco.Google Scholar
  70. Reyes-Sosa, H., Larrañaga-Egilegor, M., & Valencia-Garate, J. (2015). Dependencia representacional entre dos objetos sociales: el narcotráfico y la violencia. Revista Cultura y Representaciones Sociales, 9(18), 162–186.Google Scholar
  71. Rodelo, F. V. (2008). Ejercicio de libertad de prensa y sus limitaciones en entornos violentos. In El caso de los periodistas de Culiacán, Sinaloa, México, tesis maestría. Jalisco: Universidad de Guadalajara.Google Scholar
  72. Rouquette, M. L. (2009). La pensée sociale. Perspectivas fondamentales et recherches appliquées. Toulouse: Erés.Google Scholar
  73. Sádaba, T., Rodríguez-Virgili, J., & La-Porte, M. T. (2008). La teoría del framing en la investigación en comunicación política. In M. Canel & M. Gurrionero (Eds.), Estudios de comunicación política (pp. 15–30). España: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar
  74. Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (2015). Social representations: A revolutionary paradigm? In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, & J. Valisner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 3–11). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Sei-Hill, K., Scheufele, D., & Shanahan, J. (2002). Think about it this way: Attribute agenda-setting function of the press and the public’s evaluation of a local issue. Journalism & Mass Comunication Quarterly, 79(1), 7–25.  https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900207900102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Semetko, H., & Valkenburg, P. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Thompson, J. B. (1993). Ideologia y cultura moderna. Mexico: UAM.Google Scholar
  78. Touri, M., & Koteyko, N. (2015). Using corpus linguistic software in the extraction of news frames: Towards a dynamic process of frame analysis in journalistic texts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(6), 601–616.Google Scholar
  79. van Dijk, T. (2004). Discourse, knowledge and ideology: Reformulating old questions and proposing some new solutions. In M. Pütz, J. Neff-van Aertselaer, & T. van Dijk (Eds.), Communicating ideologies: Multidisciplinary perspectives on language, discourse and social practice (pp. 5–38). Frankfurt and Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiram Reyes-Sosa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maider Larrañaga Egilegor
    • 2
  • Tânia Dos Santos
    • 3
  • Luisa Perez-Marin
    • 4
  • Francisco Alvarez-Montero
    • 5
  1. 1.Sapienza UniversityRomeItaly
  2. 2.University of the Basque CountryLeioaSpain
  3. 3.ISCTE-IUL, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, CIS-IULLisbonPortugal
  4. 4.Universidad de ManizalesManizalesColombia
  5. 5.Autonomous University of SinaloaCuliacánMexico

Personalised recommendations