Advertisement

Playworlds and Executive Functions in Children: Theorising with the Cultural-Historical Analytical Lenses

  • Marilyn Fleer
  • Nikolai VeresovEmail author
  • Sue Walker
Regular Article

Abstract

This paper provides a theorisation of developmental conditions to support executive functions (working memory, inhibition and shifting) in children in playworlds settings, where children and teachers play together in collectively created imaginary situations. Vygotsky’s general law of development of psychological functions constitutes the general frame for the analysis of the process of development of executive functions (EF) in playworlds, and the theoretical concepts of drama, social situation of development and perezhivanie are used as analytical tools to examine opportunities of playworlds to support children executive functions.

Keywords

Executive functions Cultural-historical theory Playworlds Drama Social situation of development Perezhivanie 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by the Australian Research Council (ARC) Grant LP150100279.X.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare they have no conflict of interests.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Dauber, S. L. (1993). First-grade classroom behavior: Its short- and long-term consequences for school performance. Child Development, 64(3), 801–814.Google Scholar
  2. Antoniadou, V. (2001). Virtual collaboration, ‘perezhivanie’ and teacher learning: A socio-cultural-historical perspective. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 4(3), 53–70.Google Scholar
  3. Baddeley, A. (2006). Working memory: An overview. In S. J. Pickering (Ed.), Working memory and education (pp. 1–31). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bascandziev, I., Powell, L. J., Harris, P. L., & Carey, S. (2016). A role for executive functions in explanatory understanding of the physical world. Cognitive Development, 39, 71–85.Google Scholar
  5. Baumer, S. (2013). Play pedagogy and playworlds. In R. E. Tremblay, M. Boivin, & Peters (Eds.), Encyclopedia on early childhood development [online]. Retrieved from http://www.child-encyclopedia.com/play/according-experts/play-pedagogy-and-playworlds. Accessed February 25, 2018.
  6. Becker, D. R., McClelland, M. M., Loprinzi, P., & Trost, S. G. (2014). Physical activity, self-regulation, and early academic achievement in preschool children. Early Education and Development, 25(1), 56–70.Google Scholar
  7. Berk, L. E., & Meyers, A. B. (2013). The role of make-believe play in the development of executive function. American Journal of Play, 6(1), 98–110.Google Scholar
  8. Berk, L. E., Mann, T. D., & Ogan, A. T. (2006). Make-believe play: wellspring for development of self-regulation. In D. G. Singer, R. M. Golinkoff, & K. A. Hirsh-Pasek (Eds.), Play=learning: How play motivates and enhances cognitive and social-emotional growth (pp. 74–100). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bialystok, E., & Martin, M. (2003). Notation to symbol: Development in children’s understanding of print. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 223–243.Google Scholar
  10. Blair, C. (2002). School readiness: Integrating cognition and emotion in a neurobiological conceptualization of children's functioning at school entry. American Psychologist, 57(2), 111–127.Google Scholar
  11. Blair, C. (2016). Developmental science and executive function. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 3–7.Google Scholar
  12. Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. (2006). Self-regulation as a key to school readiness: How early childhood teachers can promote this critical competency. In M. Zaslow & I. Martinez-Beck (Eds.), Critical issues in early childhood professional development (pp. 203–224). Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  13. Bodrova, E., Leong, D. J., & Akhutina, T. (2011). When everything new is well-forgotten old: Vygotsky/Luria insights in the development of executive functions. In R. M. Lerner, J. V. Lerner, E. P. Bowers, S. Lewin-Bizan, S. Gestsdottir, & J. B. Urban (Eds.), Thriving in childhood and adolescence: The role of self-regulation processes: new directions for child and adolescent development (pp. 11–28). Jossey-Bass: Wiley Periodicals.Google Scholar
  14. Bodrova, E., Germeroth, C., & Leong, D. (2013). Play and self-regulation: Lessons from Vygotsky. American Journal of Play, 6(1), 11–123.Google Scholar
  15. Brennan, M. (2014). Perezhivanie: What have we missed about infant care? Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 15(3), 284–292.Google Scholar
  16. Brocki, K. C., & Bohlin, G. (2004). Executive functions in children aged 6 to 13: A dimensional and developmental study. Developmental Neuropsychology, 26(2), 571–593.Google Scholar
  17. Bull, R., & Scerif, G. (2001). Executive functioning as a predictor of children's mathematics ability: Inhibition, switching, and working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19(3), 273–293.Google Scholar
  18. Chen, F. (2015). Parents’ perezhivanie supports children’s development of emotion regulation: A holistic view. Early Child Development and Care, 185(6), 851–867.Google Scholar
  19. Davidson, M. C., Amso, D., Anderson, L. C., & Diamond, A. (2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4–13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44(11), 2037–2078.Google Scholar
  20. Deák, G. (2000). The growth of flexible problem solving: Preschool children use changing verbal cues to infer multiple word meanings. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 157–191.Google Scholar
  21. Denckla, M. B., & Reiss, A. L. (1997). Prefrontal-subcortical circuits in developmental disorders. In N. A. Krasnegor, G. R. Lyon, & P. S. Goldman-Rakic (Eds.), Development of the prefrontal cortex: Evolution, neurobiology, and behavior (pp. 283–293). Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  22. Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168.Google Scholar
  23. Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2007). Transitions to school: Perceptions, expectations and experiences. Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
  24. Elias, C., & Berk, L. (2002). Self-regulation in young children: Is there a role for sociodramatic play? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(2), 216–238.Google Scholar
  25. Ferholt, B. (2009). The development of cognition, emotion, imagination and creativity as made visible through adult-child joint play: Perezhivanie through playworlds. (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest dissertations and theses. (ISBN 9781109162752).Google Scholar
  26. Ferholt, B. (2010). A synthetic-analytic method for the study of perezhivanie: Vygotsky literary analysis applied to playworlds. In M. C. Connery, V. John-Steiner, & A. Marjanovic-Shane (Eds.), Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural-historical approach to play, meaning making, and the arts (pp. 163–179). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  27. Ferholt, B. (2015). Perezhivanie in researching playworlds: Applying the concept of perezhivanie in the study of play. In S. Davis, B. Ferholt, G. Clemson, S. Jansson, & A. Marjanovic-Shane (Eds.), Vygotskian and sociocultural approaches to drama, education and research (pp. 57–79). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  28. Ferholt, B., & Lecusay, R. (2010). Adult and child development in the zone of proximal development: Socratic dialogue in a playworld. Mind, Culture and Activity, 17(1), 59–83.Google Scholar
  29. Fernyhough, C. (2010). Vygotsky, Luria, and the social brain. In B. Sokol, U. Muller, J. Carpendale, A. Young, & G. Iarocci (Eds.), Self-and Social-Regulation: Exploring the Relations Between Social Interaction, Social Understanding, and the Development of Executive Functions (pp. 56–80). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Fleer, M. (2014). Theorizing play in the early years. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Fleer, M. (2016). An everyday and theoretical reading of perezhivanie for informing research in early childhood education. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 7(1), 34–49.Google Scholar
  32. Fleer, M. (2017). Digital playworlds in an Australia context. In T. Bruce, M. Bredikyte, & P. Hakkarainen (Eds.), Routledge handbook of play in early childhood (pp. 289–304). London: Routledge Press, Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  33. Fleer, M., & Hammer, M. (2013). ‘Perezhivanie’ in group settings: A cultural-historical reading of emotion regulation. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(3), 127–134.Google Scholar
  34. Fleer, M., Gonzales Rey, F., & Veresov, N. (2017). Continuing the dialogue: Advancing conceptions of emotions, perezhivanie and subjectivity for the study of human development. In Fleer et al. (Eds.), Perezhivanie, emotions and subjectivity: Advancing Vygotsky legacy (pp. 247–261). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Fleer, M., Veresov, N., & Walker, S. (2017a). Re-conceptualizing executive functions as social activity in children's playworlds. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 14, 1–11.Google Scholar
  36. Fleer, M., Harrison, L. J., Veresov, N., & Walker, S. (2017b). Working with teachers’ pedagogical strengths: The design of executive function activities for play-based programs. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 42(4), 47–55.Google Scholar
  37. Garon, N., Bryson, S., & Smith, I. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 31–60.Google Scholar
  38. Gill, S., Winters, D., & Friedman, D. S. (2006). Educators’ views of pre- kindergarten and kindergarten readiness and transition practices. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 7(3), 213–227.Google Scholar
  39. Hakkarainen, P. (2006). Learning and development in play. In J. Einarsdottir & J. T. Wagner (Eds.), Nordic childhoods and early education: Philosophy, research, policy, and practice in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden (pp. 183–222). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Hakkarainen, P. (2008). The challenges and possibilities of a narrative learning approach in the Finnish early childhood education system. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(5), 292–300.Google Scholar
  41. Hakkarainen, P. (2010). Cultural historical methodology of the study of human development in transitions. Journal of Cultural Historical Psychology, 4, 76–81.Google Scholar
  42. Hakkarainen, P., Brėdikytė, M., Jakkula, K., & Munter, H. (2013). Adult play guidance and children's play development in a narrative play-world. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 21(2), 213–225.Google Scholar
  43. Hammond, S., Bibok, M & and Carpendale, J. (2010). Theoretical perspectives on self and social regulation. In B. W. Sokol, U. Müller, J. M. Carpendale, A. Young & G. Larocci (Eds.). Self and social regulation, (pp. 1–7), New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Hughes, C. (1998). Executive function in preschoolers: Links with theory of mind and verbal ability. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 233–253.Google Scholar
  45. Hughes, C., & Graham, A. (2002). Measuring executive functions in childhood: Problems and solutions? Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 7(3), 131–142.Google Scholar
  46. Kelly, R., Dissanayake, C., Ihsen, E., & Hammond, S. (2011). The relationship between symbolic play and executive function in young children. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(2), 21–27.Google Scholar
  47. Lehto, J. E., Juujarvi, P., Kooistra, L., & Pulkkinen, L. (2003). Dimensions of executive functioning: Evidence from children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 59–80.Google Scholar
  48. Lindqvist, G. (1995). The aesthetics of play: A didactic study of play and culture in preschools. (doctoral dissertation). Uppsala University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  49. Lindqvist, G. (1996). The aesthetics of play: A didactic study of play and culture in preschools. Early Years, 17(1), 6–11.Google Scholar
  50. Lindqvist, G. (2001). When small children play: How adults dramatize and children create meaning. Early Years, 21(1), 7–14.Google Scholar
  51. Lindqvist, G. (2003). Vygotsky’s theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15(4), 245–251.Google Scholar
  52. Manuilenko, Z. (1975). The development of voluntary behavior by preschool-age children. Soviet Psychology and Psychiatry, 13, 65–116.Google Scholar
  53. Margetts, K. (2007). Understanding and supporting children: Shaping transition practices. In A. H. Dunlop & H. Fabian (Eds.), Informing transitions: Bridging research, policy and practice (pp. 107–199). London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Marjanovic-Shane, A., Ferholt, B., Miyazaki, K., Nilsson, M., Rainio, A. P., Hakkarainen, P., Pesic, M., & Beljanski-Ristic, L. (2011). Playworlds - an art of development. Play and Culture, 11, 3–31.Google Scholar
  55. Martin, J., & Failows, L. (2010). Executive function: theoretical concerns. In B. Sokol, U. Muller, J. Carpendale, A. Young, & G. Iarocci (Eds.), Self-and social-regulation: Exploring the relations between social interaction, social understanding, and the development of executive functions (pp. 35–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. McClelland, M. M., Acock, A. C., & Morrison, F. J. (2006). The impact of kindergarten learning-related skills on academic trajectories at the end of elementary school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(4), 471–490.Google Scholar
  57. McClelland, M. M., Cameron, C. E., Connor, C. M., Farris, C. L., Jewkes, A. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2007). Links between behavioral regulation and preschoolers’ literacy, vocabulary and math skills. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 947–959.Google Scholar
  58. McClelland, M. M., Acock, A. C., Piccinin, A., Rhea, S. A., & Stallings, M. C. (2013). Relations between preschool attention span-persistence and age 25 educational outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(2), 314–324.Google Scholar
  59. Mok, N. (2017). On the concept of perezhivanie: A quest for critical review. In M. Fleer, R. F. Gonzales, & N. Veresov (Eds.), Perezhivanie, emotions and subjectivity: Advancing Vygotsky legacy (pp. 19–46). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  60. Nilsson, M. (2009). Creative pedagogy of play- the work of Gunilla Lindqvist. Mind, Culture and Activity, 17(1), 14–22.Google Scholar
  61. O’Sullivan, L. P., Mitchell, L. L., & Daehler, M. W. (2001). Representation and perseveration: Influences on young children’s representational insight. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2, 339–365.Google Scholar
  62. Packiam Alloway, T. (2018). Introduction. In T. Packiam Alloway (Ed.), Working memory and clinical developmental disorders: Theories, debates and interventions (pp. 1–9). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Perner, J., Lang, B., & Kloo, D. (2002). Theory of mind and self-control: More than a common problem of inhibition. Child Development, 73(3), 752–767.Google Scholar
  64. Quiñones, G., & Fleer, M. (2011). "Visual Vivencias": A cultural-historical tool for understanding the lived experiences of young children's everyday lives. In E. Johansson & J. White (Eds.), Educational research with our youngest: Voices of infants and toddlers (pp. 107–133). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  65. Röthlisberger, M., Neuenschwander, R., Cimeli, P., Michel, E., & Roebers, C. M. (2012). Improving executive functions in 5- and 6-year-olds: Evaluation of a small group intervention in prekindergarten and kindergarten children. Infant and Child Development, 21(4), 411–429.Google Scholar
  66. Singer, J. L. (1961). Imagination and waiting ability in young children. Journal of Personality, 29, 396–413.Google Scholar
  67. Stetsenko, A., & Vianna, E. (2009). Bridging developmental theory and educational practice: Lessons from the Vygotskian project. In O. Barbarin & B. Hanna Wasik (Eds.), Handbook of child development and early education: Research to practice (pp. 38–54). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  68. Subbotsky, E. (2016). Vygotsky-Luria approach towards “conscious action” and current research on “executive function”. Sententia. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.7256/1339-3057.2016.1.17387 Retrieved from http://e-notabene.ru/psen/article_17387.html Accessed April 2019, 1, 48, 74.
  69. Vadeboncoeur, J., Perone, A., & Panina-Beard, N. (2016). Creativity as a practice of freedom: Imaginative play, moral imagination, and the production of culture. In V. P. Glaveanu (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of creativity and cultural research (pp. 285–307). Aalborg: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  70. Veresov, N. (2017). The concept of perezhivanie in cultural-historical theory: Content and contexts. In M. Fleer, R. F. Gonzales Rey, & N. Veresov (Eds.), Perezhivanie, emotions and subjectivity: Advancing Vygotsky legacy (pp. 47–70). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  71. Veresov, N., & Fleer, M. (2016). Perezhivanie as a theoretical concept for researching young children’s development. Mind, Culture and Activity, 23(4), 325–335.Google Scholar
  72. Vygotsky, L. S. (1989). Concrete human psychology. Soviet Psychology, 27(2), 53–77.Google Scholar
  73. Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. In J. Valsiner & R. Van der Veer (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 347–348). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  74. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 4: The history of the development of higher mental functions. NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  75. Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (Vol. 5). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  76. Vygotsky, L. S. (2001). Lektsii po pedologii [Lectures on pedology). Izevsk: Izdatelstvo Udmurdskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
  77. Vygotsky, L. S. (2016). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 7(2), 3–25.Google Scholar
  78. Welsh, M. C. (2002). Developmental and clinical variations in executive functions. In D. Molfese & V. Molfese (Eds.), Developmental variations in learning: Applications to social, executive function, language, and reading skills (pp. 139–185). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  79. Welsh, M. C., Friedman, S. L., & Spieker, S. (2008). Executive functions in developing children: Current conceptualizations and questions for the future. In K. McCartney & D. Phillips (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of early childhood development (pp. 176–187). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  80. Zelazo, P. D., & Müller, U. (2010). Executive function in typical and atypical development. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 574–602). Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  81. Zelazo, P. D., Carter, A., Reznick, J. S., & Frye, D. (1997). Early development of executive function: A problem-solving framework. Review of General Psychology, 1, 198–226.Google Scholar
  82. Zelazo, P. D., Muller, U., Frye, D., & Marcovitch, S. (2003). The development of executive function in early childhood. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68(3, Serial No. 274)), 1–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationMonash UniversityFrankstonAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbane CityAustralia

Personalised recommendations