Advertisement

Task Followers and Labor Market Outcomes

  • Liwen Chen
  • John Gordanier
  • Orgul OzturkEmail author
Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

This paper examines the extent to which children enter into occupations that are different from their father’s occupation, but require similar skills, which we call task following. We consider the possibility that fathers are able to transfer task-specific human capital either through investments or genetic endowments to their children. We show that there is indeed substantial task following, beyond occupational following and that task following is associated with a wage premium of around 5% over otherwise identical workers employed in a job with the same primary task. The size of the premium is similar in magnitude to the size of the premium associated with occupational following. The wage premium is robust to controls for industry, occupation categories and occupation characteristics.

Keywords

Intergenerational transmission Task measures Occupation choice 

JEL Codes

J24 J31 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Acemoglu D, Autor D (2011) Skills, tasks and technologies: implications for employment and earnings. Handbook Labor Econ 4:1043–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aina C, Nicoletti C (2014) The intergenerational transmission of Liberal professions: nepotism versus abilities. Univ York Discus Papers Econ 14Google Scholar
  3. Altonji JG, Dunn TA (2000) An intergenerational model of wages, hours, and earnings. J Hum Resour:221–258Google Scholar
  4. Autor DH, Dorn D (2013) The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market. Am Econ Rev 103(5):1553–97Google Scholar
  5. Autor DH, Levy F, Murnane RJ (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration. Q J Econ 118(4):1279–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., Kearney, M. S. (2006). The polarization of the US labor market. Am Econ Rev 96(2):189–194Google Scholar
  7. Blau, P. M., and Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. The american occupational structure. John Wiley and Sons: New York.Google Scholar
  8. Dorn D (2009) This job is "getting old": measuring changes in job opportunities using occupational age structure. Am Econ Rev 99(2):45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Escriche L (2007) Persistence of occupational segregation: the role of the intergenerational transmission of preferences. Econ J 117:837–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feinstein BD (2010) The dynasty advantage: family ties in congressional elections. Legis Stud Q 35(4):571–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Groothuis PA, Groothuis JD (2007) Nepotism or family tradition? A study of NASCAR drivers. J Sports Econ 9(3):250–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ham R, Junankar PN, Wells R (2009). Occupational Choice: Personality Matters. IZA Discussion Papers. DP No. 4105Google Scholar
  13. Hellerstein JK, Morrill MS (2011) Dads and daughters. J Hum Resour 46(2):333–372Google Scholar
  14. Knoll B, Riedel N, Schlenker E (2017) He's a Chip off the old block-the persistence of occupational choices across generations. Labour 31(2):174–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laband DN, Lentz BF (1983a) Like father, like son: toward an economic theory of occupational following. South Econ J:474–493Google Scholar
  16. Laband DN, Lentz BF (1983b) Occupational inheritance in agriculture. Am J Agric Econ 65(2):311–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laband DN, Lentz BF (1992) Self-recruitment in the legal profession. J Labor Econ:182–201Google Scholar
  18. Lentz BF, Laband DN (1989) Why so many children of doctors become doctors: nepotism vs. human capital transfers. J Hum Resour:396–413Google Scholar
  19. Lentz BF, Laband DN (1990) Entrepreneurial success and occupational inheritance among proprietors. Can J Econ:563–579Google Scholar
  20. Meyer, P. B., and Osborne, A. M. (2005). Proposed Category System for 1960–2000 Census Occupations (p. 383). Washington, DC: US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Office of Productivity and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  21. Okumura T, Usui E (2014) Do parents’ social skills influence their Children’s sociability? BE J Econ Anal Policy 14(3):1081–1116Google Scholar
  22. Okumura T, Usui E (2016) Intergenerational transmission of skills and differences in labor market outcomes for blacks and whites. Res Labor Econ 43:227–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pinchot S, Lewis BJ, Weber SM, Rikkers LF, Chen H (2008) Are surgical progeny more likely to pursue a surgical career? J Surg Res 147(2):253–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rogoff N (1953) Recent trends in occupational mobility. Ill: Free Press, GlencoeGoogle Scholar
  25. Scoppa V (2009) Intergenerational transfers of public sector jobs: a shred of evidence on nepotism. Public Choice 141(1–2):167–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.East China Normal UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.University of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations