Advertisement

Planning for Retirement? The Importance of Time Preferences

  • Robert L. Clark
  • Robert G. Hammond
  • Christelle KhalafEmail author
Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

Ensuring retirement income security is a priority for individuals, employers, and policymakers. To achieve this, employers and policymakers sponsor and subsidize retirement saving plans and provide educational interventions. The effectiveness of these tools will depend on individuals’ interest and willingness to engage in planning and preparing for retirement. Using merged administrative and survey data for public sector workers in North Carolina, we find that individuals who more heavily discount the future are less likely to plan and save for retirement. Further, retirement planning behavior is measured both subjectively and objectively, and time preferences have an association with subjectively measured retirement planning but not with objectively measured retirement planning. Finally, individuals’ retirement timing is associated with time preferences but only among individuals with a retirement plan. In total, our results highlight the important role of time preferences in determining retirement planning and preparedness.

Keywords

Retirement planning Time preferences Impatience 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Melinda Sandler Morrill, whose contributions at an earlier stage of this project are greatly appreciated. The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the Sloan Foundation, Grant Number 2013-10-20. The authors would like to thank Bryan Allard, Emma Hanson, and Aditi Pathak for research assistance. The research reported herein is part of an on-going project that is being conducted in partnership with the North Carolina Retirement Systems Division. The authors thank Janet Cowell, former North Carolina State Treasurer, Steven C. Toole, Director of the Retirement Systems Division, Mary Buonfiglio, Deputy Director of Supplemental Retirement Plans, and Sam Watts, Policy Director of the Retirement Systems Division for their help and support. An earlier draft of this paper was prepared for the 2014 SIEPR Conference on Working Longer and Retirement; the authors thank seminar participants for helpful comments. The authors also thank the editor, three referees, Olivia Mitchell, and John Pencavel for helpful suggestions. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not represent the opinions or policies of the North Carolina Retirement System or any other institution with which the authors are affiliated.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

12122_2019_9287_MOESM1_ESM.docx (69 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 69 kb)

References

  1. Ameriks J, Caplin A, Leahy J (2003) Wealth accumulation and the propensity to plan. Q J Econ 118(3):1007–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson LR, Mellor JM (2009) Are risk preferences stable? comparing an experimental measure with a validated survey-based measure. J Risk Uncertain 39(2):137–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashraf N, Camerer CF, Loewenstein G (2005) Adam Smith, Behavioral Economist. J Econ Perspect 19(3):131–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banks J, Blundell R, Casanova Rivas M (2010) The dynamics of retirement behavior in couples: Reduced-form evidence from England and the US. Working Paper, UCLAGoogle Scholar
  5. Barsky R, Juster F (1997) Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement study. Q J Econ 112(2):537–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellante DON, Link AN (1981) Are Public Sector Workers More Risk Averse Than Private Sector Workers ? Ind Labor Relat Rev 34(3):408–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Binswanger J, Carman KG (2012) How real people make long-term decisions: The case of retirement preparation. J Econ Behav Organ 81(1):39–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradford D, Courtemanche C, Heutel G, McAlvanah P, Ruhm C (2017) Time preferences and consumer behavior. J Risk Uncertain 55(2–3):119–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown J, Previtero A (2014) Procrastination, present-biased preferences, and financial behaviors. Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown JR, Farrell AM, Weisbenner SJ (2015) Decision-making approaches and the propensity to default: evidence and implications. Journal of Financial Economics, ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark RL, Hanson E, Morrill MS, Pathak A (2016) Supplemental Plan Offerings and Retirement Saving Choices: an Analysis of North Carolina School Districts. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 15(3):333–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark R, Pathak A, Pelletier D (December 2018) Supplemental Retirement Savings Plans in the Public Sector: Participation and Contribution Decisions by School Personnel. J Lab Res 39(4):383–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins JM, Urban C (2016) The Role of Information on Retirement Planning: Evidence from a Field Study. Econ Inq 54(4):1860–1872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finke MS, Huston SJ (2013) Time preference and the importance of saving for retirement. J Econ Behav Organ 89:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gustman AL, Steinmeier TL (2000) Retirement in Dual-Career Families: A Structural Model. J Labor Econ 18(3):503–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lönnqvist JE, Verkasalo M, Walkowitz G, Wichardt PC (2015) Measuring individual risk attitudes in the lab: Task or ask? An empirical comparison. J Econ Behav Organ 119:254–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lusardi A, Mitchell OS (2007) Baby Boomer retirement security: The roles of planning, financial literacy, and housing wealth. J Monet Econ 54(1):205–224Google Scholar
  18. Lusardi A, Mitchell OS (2014) The Economic Importance of Financial Literacy : Theory and Evidence. J Econ Lit 52(1):5–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Michaud P (2003) Joint labour supply dynamics of older couples. IZA Discussion Paper 832Google Scholar
  20. Petkoska J, Earl JK (2009) Understanding the influence of demographic and psychological variables on retirement planning. Psychol Aging 24(1):245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosnick D, Baker D (2014) The Wealth of Households: An Analysis of the 2013 Survey of Consumer FinancesGoogle Scholar
  22. Thaler RH (1990) Anomalies: Saving, Fungibility, and Mental Accounts. J Econ Perspect 4(1):193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. TIAA-CREF (1994) Looking ahead to retirement. Library Series No.3, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Rooij MC, Lusardi A, Alessie RJ (2011) Financial literacy and retirement planning in the Netherlands. J Econ Psychol 32(4):593–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Schie RJ, Dellaert BG, Donkers B (2015) Promoting later planned retirement: Construal level intervention impact reverses with age. J Econ Psychol 50:124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.National Bureau of Economic ResearchCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  4. 4.Voinovich School of Leadership and Public AffairsOhio UniversityAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations